148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21452686)
1. Size factor as one of the problems in the sex estimation of skulls: upper palaeolithic sample from Predmostí (Czech Republic) as an example.
Sefcáková A; Katina S; Velemínski J; Brůzek J; Velemínský P; Thurzo M
Anthropol Anz; 2010; 68(2):221-37. PubMed ID: 21452686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Variability of the Upper Palaeolithic skulls from Predmostí near Prerov (Czech Republic): craniometric comparison with recent human standards.
Velemínská J; Brůzek J; Velemínský P; Bigoni L; Sefcáková A; Katina S
Homo; 2008; 59(1):1-26. PubMed ID: 18242606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of craniometric traits in South Indian dry skulls for sex determination.
Ramamoorthy B; Pai MM; Prabhu LV; Muralimanju BV; Rai R
J Forensic Leg Med; 2016 Jan; 37():8-14. PubMed ID: 26519924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Virtual reconstruction of the Upper Palaeolithic skull from Zlatý Kůň, Czech Republic: Sex assessment and morphological affinity.
Rmoutilová R; Guyomarc'h P; Velemínský P; Šefčáková A; Samsel M; Santos F; Maureille B; Brůžek J
PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0201431. PubMed ID: 30161127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A Geometric Morphometrics Approach for Sex Estimation Based on the Orbital Region of Human Skulls from Bosnian Population.
Ajanović Z; Ajanović U; Dervišević L; Hot H; Voljevica A; Talović E; Dervišević E; Hašimbegović S; Sarač-Hadžihalilović A
Scanning; 2023; 2023():2223138. PubMed ID: 37089258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The skull and humerus in the determination of sex: reliability of discriminant function equations.
Robinson MS; Bidmos MA
Forensic Sci Int; 2009 Apr; 186(1-3):86.e1-5. PubMed ID: 19216037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of metric sex analysis of skeletal remains using Fordisc based on a recent skull collection.
Ramsthaler F; Kreutz K; Verhoff MA
Int J Legal Med; 2007 Nov; 121(6):477-82. PubMed ID: 17899153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Geometric morphometric approach to sex estimation of human pelvis.
Gonzalez PN; Bernal V; Perez SI
Forensic Sci Int; 2009 Aug; 189(1-3):68-74. PubMed ID: 19442464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sex determination using mastoid process measurement in Thais.
Manoonpol C; Plakornkul V
J Med Assoc Thai; 2012 Mar; 95(3):423-9. PubMed ID: 22550843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Recent human sexual dimorphism study using cephalometric plots on lateral teleradiography and discriminant function analysis.
Veyre-Goulet SA; Mercier C; Robin O; Guérin C
J Forensic Sci; 2008 Jul; 53(4):786-9. PubMed ID: 18544115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Human frontal inclination of the skull as a trait of sexual dimorphism--terminology and quantification].
Kölzer SC; Kümmell IV; Kölzer JT; Ramsthaler F; Plenzig S; Gehl A; Verhoff MA
Arch Kriminol; 2015; 235(1-2):11-21. PubMed ID: 26419088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sex determination by three-dimensional geometric morphometrics of craniofacial form.
Chovalopoulou ME; Valakos ED; Manolis SK
Anthropol Anz; 2016; 73(3):195-206. PubMed ID: 27490899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Estimation of sex from mastoid triangle - a craniometric analysis.
Kanchan T; Gupta A; Krishan K
J Forensic Leg Med; 2013 Oct; 20(7):855-60. PubMed ID: 24112336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Exocranial surfaces for sex assessment of the human cranium.
Musilová B; Dupej J; Velemínská J; Chaumoitre K; Bruzek J
Forensic Sci Int; 2016 Dec; 269():70-77. PubMed ID: 27883982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of four methods for the estimation of intracranial volume: a gold standard study.
Sahin B; Acer N; Sonmez OF; Emirzeoglu M; Basaloglu H; Uzun A; Bilgic S
Clin Anat; 2007 Oct; 20(7):766-73. PubMed ID: 17708568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative analysis of four morphometric methods for sex estimation: A study conducted on human skulls.
Sinhorini PA; Costa IAP; Lopez-Capp TT; Biazevic MGH; de Paiva LAS
Leg Med (Tokyo); 2019 Jul; 39():29-34. PubMed ID: 31200148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Determination of sex from juvenile crania by means of discriminant function analysis.
Gonzalez RA
J Forensic Sci; 2012 Jan; 57(1):24-34. PubMed ID: 21939443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy and reliability in sex determination from skulls: a comparison of Fordisc® 3.0 and the discriminant function analysis.
Guyomarc'h P; Bruzek J
Forensic Sci Int; 2011 May; 208(1-3):180.e1-6. PubMed ID: 21482050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of methods to determine sex by evaluating the greater sciatic notch: Visual, angular and geometric morphometrics.
Gómez-Valdés JA; Quinto-Sánchez M; Menéndez Garmendia A; Veleminska J; Sánchez-Mejorada G; Bruzek J
Forensic Sci Int; 2012 Sep; 221(1-3):156.e1-7. PubMed ID: 22607977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An osteometric study of northern Indian populations for sexual dimorphism in craniofacial region.
Saini V; Srivastava R; Rai RK; Shamal SN; Singh TB; Tripathi SK
J Forensic Sci; 2011 May; 56(3):700-5. PubMed ID: 21361935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
