These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21452726)
1. Development of a physical 3D anthropomorphic breast phantom. Carton AK; Bakic P; Ullberg C; Derand H; Maidment AD Med Phys; 2011 Feb; 38(2):891-6. PubMed ID: 21452726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A novel physical anthropomorphic breast phantom for 2D and 3D x-ray imaging. Ikejimba LC; Graff CG; Rosenthal S; Badal A; Ghammraoui B; Lo JY; Glick SJ Med Phys; 2017 Feb; 44(2):407-416. PubMed ID: 27992059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A deep learning approach to estimate x-ray scatter in digital breast tomosynthesis: From phantom models to clinical applications. Pinto MC; Mauter F; Michielsen K; Biniazan R; Kappler S; Sechopoulos I Med Phys; 2023 Aug; 50(8):4744-4757. PubMed ID: 37394837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Development of realistic physical breast phantoms matched to virtual breast phantoms based on human subject data. Kiarashi N; Nolte AC; Sturgeon GM; Segars WP; Ghate SV; Nolte LW; Samei E; Lo JY Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):4116-26. PubMed ID: 26133612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A quantitative metrology for performance characterization of five breast tomosynthesis systems based on an anthropomorphic phantom. Ikejimba L; Lo JY; Chen Y; Oberhofer N; Kiarashi N; Samei E Med Phys; 2016 Apr; 43(4):1627. PubMed ID: 27036562 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Development and characterization of an anthropomorphic breast software phantom based upon region-growing algorithm. Bakic PR; Zhang C; Maidment AD Med Phys; 2011 Jun; 38(6):3165-76. PubMed ID: 21815391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fabrication of 3D printed patient-derived anthropomorphic breast phantoms for mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis: Imaging assessment with clinical X-ray spectra. Varallo A; Sarno A; Castriconi R; Mazzilli A; Loria A; Del Vecchio A; Orientale A; Pilotti IAM; D'Andria P; Bliznakova K; Ricciardi R; Mettivier G; Russo P Phys Med; 2022 Jun; 98():88-97. PubMed ID: 35526373 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects on image quality of a 2D antiscatter grid in x-ray digital breast tomosynthesis: Initial experience using the dual modality (x-ray and molecular) breast tomosynthesis scanner. Patel T; Peppard H; Williams MB Med Phys; 2016 Apr; 43(4):1720. PubMed ID: 27036570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Breast Radiation Dose With CESM Compared With 2D FFDM and 3D Tomosynthesis Mammography. James JR; Pavlicek W; Hanson JA; Boltz TF; Patel BK AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Feb; 208(2):362-372. PubMed ID: 28112559 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dataset of patient-derived digital breast phantoms for in silico studies in breast computed tomography, digital breast tomosynthesis, and digital mammography. Sarno A; Mettivier G; di Franco F; Varallo A; Bliznakova K; Hernandez AM; Boone JM; Russo P Med Phys; 2021 May; 48(5):2682-2693. PubMed ID: 33683711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of exposure equalization on image signal-to-noise ratios in digital mammography: a simulation study with an anthropomorphic breast phantom. Liu X; Lai CJ; Whitman GJ; Geiser WR; Shen Y; Yi Y; Shaw CC Med Phys; 2011 Dec; 38(12):6489-501. PubMed ID: 22149832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Breast phantoms for 2D digital mammography with realistic anatomical structures and attenuation characteristics based on clinical images using 3D printing. Schopphoven S; Cavael P; Bock K; Fiebich M; Mäder U Phys Med Biol; 2019 Oct; 64(21):215005. PubMed ID: 31469105 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A statistically defined anthropomorphic software breast phantom. Lau BA; Reiser I; Nishikawa RM; Bakic PR Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6):3375-85. PubMed ID: 22755718 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Advances in digital and physical anthropomorphic breast phantoms for x-ray imaging. Glick SJ; Ikejimba LC Med Phys; 2018 Oct; 45(10):e870-e885. PubMed ID: 30058117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The quantitative potential for breast tomosynthesis imaging. Shafer CM; Samei E; Lo JY Med Phys; 2010 Mar; 37(3):1004-16. PubMed ID: 20384236 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Development of a patient-specific two-compartment anthropomorphic breast phantom. Prionas ND; Burkett GW; McKenney SE; Chen L; Stern RL; Boone JM Phys Med Biol; 2012 Jul; 57(13):4293-307. PubMed ID: 22705748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Breast tomosynthesis: Dosimetry and image quality assessment on phantom. Meyblum E; Gardavaud F; Dao TH; Fournier V; Beaussart P; Pigneur F; Baranes L; Rahmouni A; Luciani A Diagn Interv Imaging; 2015 Sep; 96(9):931-9. PubMed ID: 25908324 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bowtie filters for dedicated breast CT: theory and computational implementation. Kontson K; Jennings RJ Med Phys; 2015 Mar; 42(3):1453-62. PubMed ID: 25735298 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of the Detection Rate of Simulated Microcalcifications in Full-Field Digital Mammography, Digital Breast Tomosynthesis, and Synthetically Reconstructed 2-Dimensional Images Performed With 2 Different Digital X-ray Mammography Systems. Peters S; Hellmich M; Stork A; Kemper J; Grinstein O; Püsken M; Stahlhut L; Kinner S; Maintz D; Krug KB Invest Radiol; 2017 Apr; 52(4):206-215. PubMed ID: 27861206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of a breast software model for 2D and 3D X-ray imaging studies of the breast. Baneva Y; Bliznakova K; Cockmartin L; Marinov S; Buliev I; Mettivier G; Bosmans H; Russo P; Marshall N; Bliznakov Z Phys Med; 2017 Sep; 41():78-86. PubMed ID: 28483356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]