These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

334 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21452741)

  • 1. Per-beam, planar IMRT QA passing rates do not predict clinically relevant patient dose errors.
    Nelms BE; Zhen H; Tomé WA
    Med Phys; 2011 Feb; 38(2):1037-44. PubMed ID: 21452741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Moving from gamma passing rates to patient DVH-based QA metrics in pretreatment dose QA.
    Zhen H; Nelms BE; Tome WA
    Med Phys; 2011 Oct; 38(10):5477-89. PubMed ID: 21992366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using a novel dose QA tool to quantify the impact of systematic errors otherwise undetected by conventional QA methods: clinical head and neck case studies.
    Chan MF; Li J; Schupak K; Burman C
    Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2014 Feb; 13(1):57-67. PubMed ID: 23819494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pretreatment patient-specific IMRT quality assurance: a correlation study between gamma index and patient clinical dose volume histogram.
    Stasi M; Bresciani S; Miranti A; Maggio A; Sapino V; Gabriele P
    Med Phys; 2012 Dec; 39(12):7626-34. PubMed ID: 23231310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A method to reconstruct and apply 3D primary fluence for treatment delivery verification.
    Liu S; Mazur TR; Li H; Curcuru A; Green OL; Sun B; Mutic S; Yang D
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 18(1):128-138. PubMed ID: 28291913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. IMRT QA: Selecting gamma criteria based on error detection sensitivity.
    Steers JM; Fraass BA
    Med Phys; 2016 Apr; 43(4):1982. PubMed ID: 27036593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biological consequences of MLC calibration errors in IMRT delivery and QA.
    Moiseenko V; Lapointe V; James K; Yin L; Liu M; Pawlicki T
    Med Phys; 2012 Apr; 39(4):1917-24. PubMed ID: 22482613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. IMRT QA using machine learning: A multi-institutional validation.
    Valdes G; Chan MF; Lim SB; Scheuermann R; Deasy JO; Solberg TD
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Sep; 18(5):279-284. PubMed ID: 28815994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comprehensive comparison study of three different planar IMRT QA techniques using MapCHECK 2.
    Keeling VP; Ahmad S; Jin H
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 14(6):4398. PubMed ID: 24257283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluating IMRT and VMAT dose accuracy: practical examples of failure to detect systematic errors when applying a commonly used metric and action levels.
    Nelms BE; Chan MF; Jarry G; Lemire M; Lowden J; Hampton C; Feygelman V
    Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111722. PubMed ID: 24320430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Deep learning for patient-specific quality assurance: Identifying errors in radiotherapy delivery by radiomic analysis of gamma images with convolutional neural networks.
    Nyflot MJ; Thammasorn P; Wootton LS; Ford EC; Chaovalitwongse WA
    Med Phys; 2019 Feb; 46(2):456-464. PubMed ID: 30548601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. IMRT QA and gamma comparisons: The impact of detector geometry, spatial sampling, and delivery technique on gamma comparison sensitivity.
    Steers JM; Fraass BA
    Med Phys; 2021 Sep; 48(9):5367-5381. PubMed ID: 34036596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On the sensitivity of patient-specific IMRT QA to MLC positioning errors.
    Yan G; Liu C; Simon TA; Peng LC; Fox C; Li JG
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2009 Feb; 10(1):120-128. PubMed ID: 19223841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Error detection and classification in patient-specific IMRT QA with dual neural networks.
    Potter NJ; Mund K; Andreozzi JM; Li JG; Liu C; Yan G
    Med Phys; 2020 Oct; 47(10):4711-4720. PubMed ID: 33460182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Varian DynaLog file-based procedure for patient dose-volume histogram-based IMRT QA.
    Calvo-Ortega JF; Teke T; Moragues S; Pozo M; Casals-Farran J
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 15(2):4665. PubMed ID: 24710455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of Delta
    Tang D; Yang Z; Dai X; Cao Y
    Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2020; 19():1533033820945816. PubMed ID: 32720589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A study on the effect of detector resolution on gamma index passing rate for VMAT and IMRT QA.
    Woon W; Ravindran PB; Ekayanake P; S V; Lim YY; Khalid J
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Mar; 19(2):230-248. PubMed ID: 29460465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Predicting gamma passing rates for portal dosimetry-based IMRT QA using machine learning.
    Lam D; Zhang X; Li H; Deshan Y; Schott B; Zhao T; Zhang W; Mutic S; Sun B
    Med Phys; 2019 Oct; 46(10):4666-4675. PubMed ID: 31386761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. 2D IMRT QA passing rate dependency on coronal plane.
    Panetta JV; Veltchev I; Price RA; Ma CC
    Phys Med; 2023 Jun; 110():102594. PubMed ID: 37116388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sensitivity of volumetric modulated arc therapy patient specific QA results to multileaf collimator errors and correlation to dose volume histogram based metrics.
    Coleman L; Skourou C
    Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111715. PubMed ID: 24320423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.