939 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21453346)
1. Cost-effectiveness and efficiency of shockwave lithotripsy vs flexible ureteroscopic holmium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser lithotripsy in the treatment of lower pole renal calculi.
Koo V; Young M; Thompson T; Duggan B
BJU Int; 2011 Dec; 108(11):1913-6. PubMed ID: 21453346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Improved cost-effectiveness and efficiency with a slower shockwave delivery rate.
Koo V; Beattie I; Young M
BJU Int; 2010 Mar; 105(5):692-6. PubMed ID: 19888982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cost-effectiveness analysis of ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy and shock wave lithotripsy in the management of ureteral calculi in eastern China.
Zhang J; Shi Q; Wang GZ; Wang F; Jiang N
Urol Int; 2011; 86(4):470-5. PubMed ID: 21597268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of the Efficacy of Ultra-Mini PCNL, Flexible Ureteroscopy, and Shock Wave Lithotripsy on the Treatment of 1-2 cm Lower Pole Renal Calculi.
Zhang H; Hong TY; Li G; Jiang N; Hu C; Cui X; Chu C; Zhao JL
Urol Int; 2019; 102(2):153-159. PubMed ID: 30352443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Retrograde ureteropyeloscopic treatment of 2 cm. or greater upper urinary tract and minor Staghorn calculi.
Grasso M; Conlin M; Bagley D
J Urol; 1998 Aug; 160(2):346-51. PubMed ID: 9679874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Primary SWL Is an Efficient and Cost-Effective Treatment for Lower Pole Renal Stones Between 10 and 20 mm in Size: A Large Single Center Study.
Chan LH; Good DW; Laing K; Phipps S; Thomas BG; Keanie JY; Tolley DA; Cutress ML
J Endourol; 2017 May; 31(5):510-516. PubMed ID: 28355100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Management of lower pole renal calculi: shock wave lithotripsy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus flexible ureteroscopy.
Preminger GM
Urol Res; 2006 Apr; 34(2):108-11. PubMed ID: 16463145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Efficiency and cost of treating proximal ureteral stones: shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy plus holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser.
Parker BD; Frederick RW; Reilly TP; Lowry PS; Bird ET
Urology; 2004 Dec; 64(6):1102-6; discussion 1106. PubMed ID: 15596177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for multiple unilateral intrarenal stones.
Breda A; Ogunyemi O; Leppert JT; Schulam PG
Eur Urol; 2009 May; 55(5):1190-6. PubMed ID: 18571315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost-effectiveness comparison of renal calculi treated with ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy versus shockwave lithotripsy.
Cone EB; Eisner BH; Ursiny M; Pareek G
J Endourol; 2014 Jun; 28(6):639-43. PubMed ID: 24444144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prospective randomized trial comparing shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopic lithotripsy for management of large upper third ureteral stones.
Lee YH; Tsai JY; Jiaan BP; Wu T; Yu CC
Urology; 2006 Mar; 67(3):480-4; discussion 484. PubMed ID: 16527562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Flexible ureterorenoscopy versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for treatment of lower pole stones of 10-20 mm.
El-Nahas AR; Ibrahim HM; Youssef RF; Sheir KZ
BJU Int; 2012 Sep; 110(6):898-902. PubMed ID: 22372915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Therapeutic options for proximal ureter stone: extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus semirigid ureterorenoscope with holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser lithotripsy.
Wu CF; Chen CS; Lin WY; Shee JJ; Lin CL; Chen Y; Huang WS
Urology; 2005 Jun; 65(6):1075-9. PubMed ID: 15893812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Percutaneous nephrostolithotomy versus flexible ureteroscopy/holmium laser lithotripsy: cost and outcome analysis.
Hyams ES; Shah O
J Urol; 2009 Sep; 182(3):1012-7. PubMed ID: 19616804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cost-effectiveness comparison of ureteral calculi treated with ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy versus shockwave lithotripsy.
Cone EB; Pareek G; Ursiny M; Eisner B
World J Urol; 2017 Jan; 35(1):161-166. PubMed ID: 27145788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ureteroscopic and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for rather large renal pelvis calculi.
Tavakkoli Tabasi K; Baghban Haghighi M
Urol J; 2007; 4(4):221-5. PubMed ID: 18270946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Management of 10-15-mm proximal ureteral stones: ureteroscopy or extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy?
Ziaee SA; Halimiasl P; Aminsharifi A; Shafi H; Beigi FM; Basiri A
Urology; 2008 Jan; 71(1):28-31. PubMed ID: 18242359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The clinical and cost effectiveness of surgical interventions for stones in the lower pole of the kidney: the percutaneous nephrolithotomy, flexible ureterorenoscopy and extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for lower pole kidney stones randomised controlled trial (PUrE RCT) protocol.
McClinton S; Starr K; Thomas R; MacLennan G; Lam T; Hernandez R; Pickard R; Anson K; Clark T; MacLennan S; Thomas D; Smith D; Turney B; McDonald A; Cameron S; Wiseman O
Trials; 2020 Jun; 21(1):479. PubMed ID: 32498699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cost-effectiveness of treating ureteral stones in a Taipei City Hospital: shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy plus lithoclast.
Huang CY; Chen SS; Chen LK
Urol Int; 2009; 83(4):410-5. PubMed ID: 19996647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Flexible ureteroscopy with holmium laser lithotripsy: a new choice for intrarenal stone patients.
Xu C; Song RJ; Jiang MJ; Qin C; Wang XL; Zhang W
Urol Int; 2015; 94(1):93-8. PubMed ID: 25074621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
