These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

943 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21453346)

  • 1. Cost-effectiveness and efficiency of shockwave lithotripsy vs flexible ureteroscopic holmium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser lithotripsy in the treatment of lower pole renal calculi.
    Koo V; Young M; Thompson T; Duggan B
    BJU Int; 2011 Dec; 108(11):1913-6. PubMed ID: 21453346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Improved cost-effectiveness and efficiency with a slower shockwave delivery rate.
    Koo V; Beattie I; Young M
    BJU Int; 2010 Mar; 105(5):692-6. PubMed ID: 19888982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cost-effectiveness analysis of ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy and shock wave lithotripsy in the management of ureteral calculi in eastern China.
    Zhang J; Shi Q; Wang GZ; Wang F; Jiang N
    Urol Int; 2011; 86(4):470-5. PubMed ID: 21597268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of the Efficacy of Ultra-Mini PCNL, Flexible Ureteroscopy, and Shock Wave Lithotripsy on the Treatment of 1-2 cm Lower Pole Renal Calculi.
    Zhang H; Hong TY; Li G; Jiang N; Hu C; Cui X; Chu C; Zhao JL
    Urol Int; 2019; 102(2):153-159. PubMed ID: 30352443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Retrograde ureteropyeloscopic treatment of 2 cm. or greater upper urinary tract and minor Staghorn calculi.
    Grasso M; Conlin M; Bagley D
    J Urol; 1998 Aug; 160(2):346-51. PubMed ID: 9679874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Primary SWL Is an Efficient and Cost-Effective Treatment for Lower Pole Renal Stones Between 10 and 20 mm in Size: A Large Single Center Study.
    Chan LH; Good DW; Laing K; Phipps S; Thomas BG; Keanie JY; Tolley DA; Cutress ML
    J Endourol; 2017 May; 31(5):510-516. PubMed ID: 28355100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Management of lower pole renal calculi: shock wave lithotripsy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus flexible ureteroscopy.
    Preminger GM
    Urol Res; 2006 Apr; 34(2):108-11. PubMed ID: 16463145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Efficiency and cost of treating proximal ureteral stones: shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy plus holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser.
    Parker BD; Frederick RW; Reilly TP; Lowry PS; Bird ET
    Urology; 2004 Dec; 64(6):1102-6; discussion 1106. PubMed ID: 15596177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for multiple unilateral intrarenal stones.
    Breda A; Ogunyemi O; Leppert JT; Schulam PG
    Eur Urol; 2009 May; 55(5):1190-6. PubMed ID: 18571315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cost-effectiveness comparison of renal calculi treated with ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy versus shockwave lithotripsy.
    Cone EB; Eisner BH; Ursiny M; Pareek G
    J Endourol; 2014 Jun; 28(6):639-43. PubMed ID: 24444144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prospective randomized trial comparing shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopic lithotripsy for management of large upper third ureteral stones.
    Lee YH; Tsai JY; Jiaan BP; Wu T; Yu CC
    Urology; 2006 Mar; 67(3):480-4; discussion 484. PubMed ID: 16527562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Flexible ureterorenoscopy versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for treatment of lower pole stones of 10-20 mm.
    El-Nahas AR; Ibrahim HM; Youssef RF; Sheir KZ
    BJU Int; 2012 Sep; 110(6):898-902. PubMed ID: 22372915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Therapeutic options for proximal ureter stone: extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus semirigid ureterorenoscope with holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser lithotripsy.
    Wu CF; Chen CS; Lin WY; Shee JJ; Lin CL; Chen Y; Huang WS
    Urology; 2005 Jun; 65(6):1075-9. PubMed ID: 15893812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Percutaneous nephrostolithotomy versus flexible ureteroscopy/holmium laser lithotripsy: cost and outcome analysis.
    Hyams ES; Shah O
    J Urol; 2009 Sep; 182(3):1012-7. PubMed ID: 19616804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cost-effectiveness comparison of ureteral calculi treated with ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy versus shockwave lithotripsy.
    Cone EB; Pareek G; Ursiny M; Eisner B
    World J Urol; 2017 Jan; 35(1):161-166. PubMed ID: 27145788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ureteroscopic and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for rather large renal pelvis calculi.
    Tavakkoli Tabasi K; Baghban Haghighi M
    Urol J; 2007; 4(4):221-5. PubMed ID: 18270946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Management of 10-15-mm proximal ureteral stones: ureteroscopy or extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy?
    Ziaee SA; Halimiasl P; Aminsharifi A; Shafi H; Beigi FM; Basiri A
    Urology; 2008 Jan; 71(1):28-31. PubMed ID: 18242359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The clinical and cost effectiveness of surgical interventions for stones in the lower pole of the kidney: the percutaneous nephrolithotomy, flexible ureterorenoscopy and extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for lower pole kidney stones randomised controlled trial (PUrE RCT) protocol.
    McClinton S; Starr K; Thomas R; MacLennan G; Lam T; Hernandez R; Pickard R; Anson K; Clark T; MacLennan S; Thomas D; Smith D; Turney B; McDonald A; Cameron S; Wiseman O
    Trials; 2020 Jun; 21(1):479. PubMed ID: 32498699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cost-effectiveness of treating ureteral stones in a Taipei City Hospital: shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy plus lithoclast.
    Huang CY; Chen SS; Chen LK
    Urol Int; 2009; 83(4):410-5. PubMed ID: 19996647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Flexible ureteroscopy with holmium laser lithotripsy: a new choice for intrarenal stone patients.
    Xu C; Song RJ; Jiang MJ; Qin C; Wang XL; Zhang W
    Urol Int; 2015; 94(1):93-8. PubMed ID: 25074621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 48.