These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21453952)

  • 21. A two reservoir model to predict Escherichia coli losses to water from pastures grazed by dairy cows.
    Muirhead RW; Monaghan RM
    Environ Int; 2012 Apr; 40():8-14. PubMed ID: 22280922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Microbial source tracking: a forensic technique for microbial source identification?
    Stapleton CM; Wyer MD; Kay D; Crowther J; McDonald AT; Walters M; Gawler A; Hindle T
    J Environ Monit; 2007 May; 9(5):427-39. PubMed ID: 17492088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Faecal indicator pollution from a dairy farm in Ayrshire, Scotland: source apportionment, risk assessment and potential of mitigation measures.
    Vinten AJ; Sym G; Avdic K; Crawford C; Duncan A; Merrilees DW
    Water Res; 2008 Feb; 42(4-5):997-1012. PubMed ID: 18001813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Economic and phosphorus-related effects of precision feeding and forage management at a farm scale.
    Ghebremichael LT; Cerosaletti PE; Veith TL; Rotz CA; Hamlett JM; Gburek WJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2007 Aug; 90(8):3700-15. PubMed ID: 17638981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Impact of recreation on recreational water quality of a small tropical stream.
    Phillip DA; Antoine P; Cooper V; Francis L; Mangal E; Seepersad N; Ragoo R; Ramsaran S; Singh I; Ramsubhag A
    J Environ Monit; 2009 Jun; 11(6):1192-8. PubMed ID: 19513450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Predicting diffuse microbial pollution risk across catchments: The performance of SCIMAP and recommendations for future development.
    Porter KDH; Reaney SM; Quilliam RS; Burgess C; Oliver DM
    Sci Total Environ; 2017 Dec; 609():456-465. PubMed ID: 28755595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Escherichia coli loading at or near base flow in a mixed-use watershed.
    Gentry RW; McCarthy J; Layton A; McKay LD; Williams D; Koirala SR; Sayler GS
    J Environ Qual; 2006; 35(6):2244-9. PubMed ID: 17071895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Diurnal variability in concentrations and sources of Escherichia coli in three streams.
    Meays CL; Broersma K; Nordin R; Mazumder A; Samadpour M
    Can J Microbiol; 2006 Nov; 52(11):1130-5. PubMed ID: 17215905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Waterfowl and the bacteriological quality of amenity ponds.
    Abulreesh HH; Paget TA; Goulder R
    J Water Health; 2004 Sep; 2(3):183-9. PubMed ID: 15497814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Linking land-use type and stream water quality using spatial data of fecal indicator bacteria and heavy metals in the Yeongsan river basin.
    Kang JH; Lee SW; Cho KH; Ki SJ; Cha SM; Kim JH
    Water Res; 2010 Jul; 44(14):4143-57. PubMed ID: 20599099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Monitoring coastal marine waters for spore-forming bacteria of faecal and soil origin to determine point from non-point source pollution.
    Fujioka RS
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 44(7):181-8. PubMed ID: 11724486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Use of in-stream reservoirs to reduce bacterial contamination of rural watersheds.
    Gannon VP; Duke GD; Thomas JE; Vanleeuwen J; Byrne J; Johnson D; Kienzle SW; Little J; Graham T; Selinger B
    Sci Total Environ; 2005 Sep; 348(1-3):19-31. PubMed ID: 16162311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Predicting the effect of livestock inputs of E. coli on microbiological compliance of bathing waters.
    Vinten AJ; Lewis DR; McGechan M; Duncan A; Aitken M; Hill C; Crawford C
    Water Res; 2004; 38(14-15):3215-24. PubMed ID: 15276737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Short communication: survival of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in dairy cattle drinking water.
    Rice EW; Johnson CH
    J Dairy Sci; 2000 Sep; 83(9):2021-3. PubMed ID: 11003233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Modelling Escherichia coli concentrations in the tidal Scheldt river and estuary.
    de Brauwere A; de Brye B; Servais P; Passerat J; Deleersnijder E
    Water Res; 2011 Apr; 45(9):2724-38. PubMed ID: 21435674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of E. coli O157 and Shiga toxin-encoding genes (stx) prevalence between Ohio, USA and Norwegian dairy cattle.
    LeJeune JT; Hancock D; Wasteson Y; Skjerve E; Urdahl AM
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2006 May; 109(1-2):19-24. PubMed ID: 16504323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Characterizing sources of nitrate leaching from an irrigated dairy farm in Merced County, California.
    van der Schans ML; Harter T; Leijnse A; Mathews MC; Meyer RD
    J Contam Hydrol; 2009 Nov; 110(1-2):9-21. PubMed ID: 19767124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Faecal-indicator concentrations in waters draining lowland pastoral catchments in the UK: relationships with land use and farming practices.
    Crowther J; Kay D; Wyer MD
    Water Res; 2002 Apr; 36(7):1725-34. PubMed ID: 12044072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Impact of agricultural practices and river catchment characteristics on river and bathing water quality.
    Aitken MN
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 48(10):217-24. PubMed ID: 15137173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Linking the uptake of best management practices on dairy farms to catchment water quality improvement over a 20-year period.
    McDowell RW; Macintosh KA; Depree C
    Sci Total Environ; 2023 Oct; 895():164963. PubMed ID: 37348722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.