227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21454324)
1. The Simpson's paradox unraveled.
Hernán MA; Clayton D; Keiding N
Int J Epidemiol; 2011 Jun; 40(3):780-5. PubMed ID: 21454324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Simpson's paradox and experimental research.
Ameringer S; Serlin RC; Ward S
Nurs Res; 2009; 58(2):123-7. PubMed ID: 19289933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Misleading Epidemiological and Statistical Evidence in the Presence of Simpson's Paradox: An Illustrative Study Using Simulated Scenarios of Observational Study Designs.
Rojanaworarit C
J Med Life; 2020; 13(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 32341699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Response to: Simpson's Paradox is suppression, but Lord's Paradox is neither: clarification of and correction to Tu, Gunnell, and Gilthorpe (2008) by Nickerson CA & Brown NJL (https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-7622-5-2).
Gilthorpe MS; Tu YK
Emerg Themes Epidemiol; 2020; 17():1. PubMed ID: 32190094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Simpson's paradox in psychological science: a practical guide.
Kievit RA; Frankenhuis WE; Waldorp LJ; Borsboom D
Front Psychol; 2013; 4():513. PubMed ID: 23964259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The role of causal reasoning in understanding Simpson's paradox, Lord's paradox, and the suppression effect: covariate selection in the analysis of observational studies.
Arah OA
Emerg Themes Epidemiol; 2008 Feb; 5():5. PubMed ID: 18302750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bounds for pure direct effect.
Tchetgen Tchetgen EJ; Phiri K
Epidemiology; 2014 Sep; 25(5):775-6. PubMed ID: 25076155
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The potential for Simpson's paradox in drug utilization studies.
Neutel CI
Ann Epidemiol; 1997 Oct; 7(7):517-21. PubMed ID: 9349920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Confounding and Simpson's paradox.
Julious SA; Mullee MA
BMJ; 1994 Dec; 309(6967):1480-1. PubMed ID: 7804052
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect decomposition in the presence of an exposure-induced mediator-outcome confounder.
Vanderweele TJ; Vansteelandt S; Robins JM
Epidemiology; 2014 Mar; 25(2):300-6. PubMed ID: 24487213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Analytic results on the bias due to nondifferential misclassification of a binary mediator.
Ogburn EL; VanderWeele TJ
Am J Epidemiol; 2012 Sep; 176(6):555-61. PubMed ID: 22930481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Simpson's Paradox is suppression, but Lord's Paradox is neither: clarification of and correction to Tu, Gunnell, and Gilthorpe (2008).
Nickerson CA; Brown NJL
Emerg Themes Epidemiol; 2019; 16():5. PubMed ID: 31788009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Simpson's Paradox, Lord's Paradox, and Suppression Effects are the same phenomenon--the reversal paradox.
Tu YK; Gunnell D; Gilthorpe MS
Emerg Themes Epidemiol; 2008 Jan; 5():2. PubMed ID: 18211676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Simpson's paradox visualized: the example of the rosiglitazone meta-analysis.
Rücker G; Schumacher M
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2008 May; 8():34. PubMed ID: 18513392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Estimating causal effects from epidemiological data.
Hernán MA; Robins JM
J Epidemiol Community Health; 2006 Jul; 60(7):578-86. PubMed ID: 16790829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. How reliable are chance-corrected measures of agreement?
Guggenmoos-Holzmann I
Stat Med; 1993 Dec; 12(23):2191-205. PubMed ID: 8310189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Noncollapsibility, confounding, and sparse-data bias. Part 1: The oddities of odds.
Greenland S
J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Oct; 138():178-181. PubMed ID: 34119646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Confounding obscures our view, effect modification is part of reality.
Knottnerus JA; Tugwell P
J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Oct; 114():v-vi. PubMed ID: 31570139
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The Simpson's paradox and fMRI: Similarities and differences between functional connectivity measures derived from within-subject and across-subject correlations.
Roberts RP; Hach S; Tippett LJ; Addis DR
Neuroimage; 2016 Jul; 135():1-15. PubMed ID: 27101735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Nursing home residence confounds gender differences in Medicare utilization an example of Simpson's paradox.
Kronman AC; Freund KM; Hanchate A; Emanuel EJ; Ash AS
Womens Health Issues; 2010; 20(2):105-13. PubMed ID: 20149970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
