These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21457009)

  • 1. Biomarker discovery using statistically significant gene sets.
    Kim H; Watkinson J; Anastassiou D
    J Comput Biol; 2011 Oct; 18(10):1329-38. PubMed ID: 21457009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Feature selection and nearest centroid classification for protein mass spectrometry.
    Levner I
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Mar; 6():68. PubMed ID: 15788095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Many accurate small-discriminatory feature subsets exist in microarray transcript data: biomarker discovery.
    Grate LR
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Apr; 6():97. PubMed ID: 15826317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A mixture model-based approach to the clustering of microarray expression data.
    McLachlan GJ; Bean RW; Peel D
    Bioinformatics; 2002 Mar; 18(3):413-22. PubMed ID: 11934740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ensemble gene selection by grouping for microarray data classification.
    Liu H; Liu L; Zhang H
    J Biomed Inform; 2010 Feb; 43(1):81-7. PubMed ID: 19699316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Individualized markers optimize class prediction of microarray data.
    Pavlidis P; Poirazi P
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 Jul; 7():345. PubMed ID: 16842618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An entropy-based gene selection method for cancer classification using microarray data.
    Liu X; Krishnan A; Mondry A
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Mar; 6():76. PubMed ID: 15790388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biomarker identification and cancer classification based on microarray data using Laplace naive Bayes model with mean shrinkage.
    Wu MY; Dai DQ; Shi Y; Yan H; Zhang XF
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2012; 9(6):1649-62. PubMed ID: 22868679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Gene expression analysis in clear cell renal cell carcinoma using gene set enrichment analysis for biostatistical management.
    Maruschke M; Reuter D; Koczan D; Hakenberg OW; Thiesen HJ
    BJU Int; 2011 Jul; 108(2 Pt 2):E29-35. PubMed ID: 21435154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Outcome prediction based on microarray analysis: a critical perspective on methods.
    Zervakis M; Blazadonakis ME; Tsiliki G; Danilatou V; Tsiknakis M; Kafetzopoulos D
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2009 Feb; 10():53. PubMed ID: 19200394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A robust tool for discriminative analysis and feature selection in paired samples impacts the identification of the genes essential for reprogramming lung tissue to adenocarcinoma.
    Toh SH; Prathipati P; Motakis E; Kwoh CK; Yenamandra SP; Kuznetsov VA
    BMC Genomics; 2011 Nov; 12 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S24. PubMed ID: 22369099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparative analysis of biomarker selection techniques.
    Dessì N; Pascariello E; Pes B
    Biomed Res Int; 2013; 2013():387673. PubMed ID: 24324960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of seven methods for producing Affymetrix expression scores based on False Discovery Rates in disease profiling data.
    Shedden K; Chen W; Kuick R; Ghosh D; Macdonald J; Cho KR; Giordano TJ; Gruber SB; Fearon ER; Taylor JM; Hanash S
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Feb; 6():26. PubMed ID: 15705192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Statistical approach for selection of biologically informative genes.
    Das S; Rai A; Mishra DC; Rai SN
    Gene; 2018 May; 655():71-83. PubMed ID: 29458166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A novel class dependent feature selection method for cancer biomarker discovery.
    Zhou W; Dickerson JA
    Comput Biol Med; 2014 Apr; 47():66-75. PubMed ID: 24561345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. HykGene: a hybrid approach for selecting marker genes for phenotype classification using microarray gene expression data.
    Wang Y; Makedon FS; Ford JC; Pearlman J
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Apr; 21(8):1530-7. PubMed ID: 15585531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A theoretical analysis of gene selection.
    Mukherjee S; Roberts SJ
    Proc IEEE Comput Syst Bioinform Conf; 2004; ():131-41. PubMed ID: 16448007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Gene subsets extraction based on Mutual-Information-based Minimum Spanning Trees model.
    He J; Zhou F; Zhong W; Pan Y
    Int J Comput Biol Drug Des; 2009; 2(2):187-203. PubMed ID: 20090170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effects of normalization on the correlation structure of microarray data.
    Qiu X; Brooks AI; Klebanov L; Yakovlev N
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 6():120. PubMed ID: 15904488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A general modular framework for gene set enrichment analysis.
    Ackermann M; Strimmer K
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2009 Feb; 10():47. PubMed ID: 19192285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.