258 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21457971)
1. National semen analysis reference range reporting: adherence to the 1999 World Health Organization guidelines 10 years later.
Penn HA; Windsperger A; Smith Z; Parekattil SJ; Kuang WW; Kolettis PN; Nangia AK
Fertil Steril; 2011 Jun; 95(7):2320-3. PubMed ID: 21457971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [External quality assessment of semen analysis in Poland].
Jedrzejczak P; Talarczyk J; Taszarek-Hauke G; Berger A; Hauke J; Pawelczyk L
Ginekol Pol; 2012 Nov; 83(11):835-40. PubMed ID: 23379191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of the new 2010 World Health Organization criteria for semen analyses on male infertility.
Murray KS; James A; McGeady JB; Reed ML; Kuang WW; Nangia AK
Fertil Steril; 2012 Dec; 98(6):1428-31. PubMed ID: 22921910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. What is normal semen quality? On the use and abuse of reference limits for the interpretation of semen analysis results.
Björndahl L
Hum Fertil (Camb); 2011 Sep; 14(3):179-86. PubMed ID: 21770820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ten years' experience with an external quality control program for semen analysis.
Mallidis C; Cooper TG; Hellenkemper B; Lablans M; Uckert F; Nieschlag E
Fertil Steril; 2012 Sep; 98(3):611-616.e4. PubMed ID: 22633256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Acceptable variability in external quality assessment programmes for basic semen analysis.
Palacios ER; Clavero A; Gonzalvo MC; Rosales A; Mozas J; Martínez L; Ramírez JP; Björndahl L; Morancho-Zaragoza J; Fernández-Pardo E; Castilla JA
Hum Reprod; 2012 Feb; 27(2):314-22. PubMed ID: 22144421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Semen analysis: looking for an upgrade in class.
De Jonge C
Fertil Steril; 2012 Feb; 97(2):260-6. PubMed ID: 22289285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Semen analysis: its place in modern reproductive medical practice.
McLachlan RI; Baker HW; Clarke GN; Harrison KL; Matson PL; Holden CA; de Kretser DM; ; ;
Pathology; 2003 Feb; 35(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 12701680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Analysis of semen parameters in male referrals: impact of reference limits, stratification by fertility categories, predictors of change, and comparison of normal semen parameters in subfertile couples.
Baker K; Li J; Sabanegh E
Fertil Steril; 2015 Jan; 103(1):59-65.e5. PubMed ID: 25450301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical implications of the new 2010 WHO reference ranges for human semen characteristics.
Yerram N; Sandlow JI; Brannigan RE
J Androl; 2012; 33(3):289-90. PubMed ID: 21799140
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination and Processing of Human Semen: its applicability to andrology laboratories in China].
Lu JC; Huang YF; Lü NQ
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2010 Oct; 16(10):867-71. PubMed ID: 21243747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Is the semen analysis a reliable test?].
Keel BA
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2005 Feb; 11(2):85-90. PubMed ID: 15755022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Inconsistent Adoption of World Health Organization V (2010) Semen Analysis Reference Ranges in the United States Eight Years After Publication.
Lewis KC; Lam I; Nieb J; Lam G; Desai AS; Mazur DJ; Kahn B; Keeter MK; Tatem A; Hehemann M; Frainey BT; Bennett JN; Brannigan RE
Urology; 2019 Apr; 126():96-101. PubMed ID: 30605693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Critical appraisal of World Health Organization's new reference values for human semen characteristics and effect on diagnosis and treatment of subfertile men.
Esteves SC; Zini A; Aziz N; Alvarez JG; Sabanegh ES; Agarwal A
Urology; 2012 Jan; 79(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 22070891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Is quality assurance in semen analysis still really necessary? A view from the andrology laboratory.
Pacey AA
Hum Reprod; 2006 May; 21(5):1105-9. PubMed ID: 16396933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical relevance of routine semen analysis and controversies surrounding the 2010 World Health Organization criteria for semen examination.
Esteves SC
Int Braz J Urol; 2014; 40(4):443-53. PubMed ID: 25254609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. World Health Organization reference values for human semen characteristics.
Cooper TG; Noonan E; von Eckardstein S; Auger J; Baker HW; Behre HM; Haugen TB; Kruger T; Wang C; Mbizvo MT; Vogelsong KM
Hum Reprod Update; 2010; 16(3):231-45. PubMed ID: 19934213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Is your andrology service up to scratch?
Tomlinson M
Hum Fertil (Camb); 2010 Dec; 13(4):194-200. PubMed ID: 21117928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection benefits for patients with oligoasthenozoospermia according to the 2010 World Health Organization reference values.
Setti AS; Figueira Rde C; Braga DP; Iaconelli A; Borges E
Fertil Steril; 2011 Jun; 95(8):2711-4. PubMed ID: 21458802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Semen quality and age-specific changes: a study between two decades on 3,729 male partners of couples with normal sperm count and attending an andrology laboratory for infertility-related problems in an Indian city.
Mukhopadhyay D; Varghese AC; Pal M; Banerjee SK; Bhattacharyya AK; Sharma RK; Agarwal A
Fertil Steril; 2010 May; 93(7):2247-54. PubMed ID: 19328484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
