BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21458057)

  • 1. Before the N400: effects of lexical-semantic violations in visual cortex.
    Dikker S; Pylkkanen L
    Brain Lang; 2011 Jul; 118(1-2):23-8. PubMed ID: 21458057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interplay between syntax and semantics during sentence comprehension: ERP effects of combining syntactic and semantic violations.
    Hagoort P
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Aug; 15(6):883-99. PubMed ID: 14511541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The semantic processing of syntactic structure in sentence comprehension: an ERP study.
    Ye Z; Zhan W; Zhou X
    Brain Res; 2007 Apr; 1142():135-45. PubMed ID: 17303093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Neural mechanisms of language comprehension: challenges to syntax.
    Kuperberg GR
    Brain Res; 2007 May; 1146():23-49. PubMed ID: 17400197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Early occipital sensitivity to syntactic category is based on form typicality.
    Dikker S; Rabagliati H; Farmer TA; Pylkkänen L
    Psychol Sci; 2010 May; 21(5):629-34. PubMed ID: 20483838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The elicitation of phonological and semantic neuromagnetic field components by non-words in human auditory sentence comprehension.
    Inouchi M; Kubota M; Ferrari P; Roberts TP
    Neurosci Lett; 2005 May 20-27; 380(1-2):116-21. PubMed ID: 15854762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Localization of syntactic and semantic brain responses using magnetoencephalography.
    Service E; Helenius P; Maury S; Salmelin R
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Jul; 19(7):1193-205. PubMed ID: 17583994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Semantics does not need a processing license from syntax in reading Chinese.
    Zhang Y; Yu J; Boland JE
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 May; 36(3):765-81. PubMed ID: 20438271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Phonotactic knowledge and lexical-semantic processing in one-year-olds: brain responses to words and nonsense words in picture contexts.
    Friedrich M; Friederici AD
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Nov; 17(11):1785-802. PubMed ID: 16269114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Localization of electrophysiological responses to semantic and syntactic anomalies in language comprehension with MEG.
    Kielar A; Panamsky L; Links KA; Meltzer JA
    Neuroimage; 2015 Jan; 105():507-24. PubMed ID: 25463470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Event-related potentials suggest early interaction between syntax and semantics during on-line sentence comprehension.
    Palolahti M; Leino S; Jokela M; Kopra K; Paavilainen P
    Neurosci Lett; 2005 Aug; 384(3):222-7. PubMed ID: 15894426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. N400-like potentials and reaction times index semantic relations between highly repeated individual words.
    Renoult L; Debruille JB
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Apr; 23(4):905-22. PubMed ID: 19929764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Seeing words in context: the interaction of lexical and sentence level information during reading.
    Hoeks JC; Stowe LA; Doedens G
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Mar; 19(1):59-73. PubMed ID: 14972359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The influence of semantic category membership on syntactic decisions: a study using event-related brain potentials.
    Schiller NO; Schuhmann T; Neyndorff AC; Jansma BM
    Brain Res; 2006 Apr; 1082(1):153-64. PubMed ID: 16510127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evidence for automatic sentence priming in the fusiform semantic area: convergent ERP and fMRI findings.
    Dien J; O'Hare AJ
    Brain Res; 2008 Dec; 1243():134-45. PubMed ID: 18840418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Lexical competition in nonnative speech comprehension.
    FitzPatrick I; Indefrey P
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Jun; 22(6):1165-78. PubMed ID: 19583470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Lexical access in American Sign Language: an ERP investigation of effects of semantics and phonology.
    Gutierrez E; Williams D; Grosvald M; Corina D
    Brain Res; 2012 Aug; 1468():63-83. PubMed ID: 22763237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Is animacy special? ERP correlates of semantic violations and animacy violations in sentence processing.
    Szewczyk JM; Schriefers H
    Brain Res; 2011 Jan; 1368():208-21. PubMed ID: 21029726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Predicting language: MEG evidence for lexical preactivation.
    Dikker S; Pylkkänen L
    Brain Lang; 2013 Oct; 127(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 23040469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Getting real about semantic illusions: rethinking the functional role of the P600 in language comprehension.
    Brouwer H; Fitz H; Hoeks J
    Brain Res; 2012 Mar; 1446():127-43. PubMed ID: 22361114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.