These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

580 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21458232)

  • 21. Mechanical evaluation of orthodontic mini-implants of different lengths.
    Pithon MM; Figueiredo DS; Oliveira DD
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Mar; 71(3):479-86. PubMed ID: 23273488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Insertion angle impact on primary stability of orthodontic mini-implants.
    Wilmes B; Su YY; Drescher D
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Nov; 78(6):1065-70. PubMed ID: 18947280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Peak insertion torque values of five mini-implant systems under different insertion loads.
    Quraishi E; Sherriff M; Bister D
    J Orthod; 2014 Jun; 41(2):102-9. PubMed ID: 24521745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Predrilling of the implant site: Is it necessary for orthodontic mini-implants?
    Baumgaertel S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Jun; 137(6):825-9. PubMed ID: 20685539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Microdamage in cortical bone due to the overtightening of orthodontic microscrews.
    Wawrzinek C; Sommer T; Fischer-Brandies H
    J Orofac Orthop; 2008 Mar; 69(2):121-34. PubMed ID: 18385958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Influence of surgical technique and surface roughness on the primary stability of an implant in artificial bone with different cortical thickness: a laboratory study.
    Tabassum A; Meijer GJ; Wolke JG; Jansen JA
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Feb; 21(2):213-20. PubMed ID: 20070754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Recommended placement torque when tightening an orthodontic mini-implant.
    Motoyoshi M; Hirabayashi M; Uemura M; Shimizu N
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Feb; 17(1):109-14. PubMed ID: 16441792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Biomechanical properties of orthodontic miniscrews. An in-vitro study.
    Florvaag B; Kneuertz P; Lazar F; Koebke J; Zöller JE; Braumann B; Mischkowski RA
    J Orofac Orthop; 2010 Jan; 71(1):53-67. PubMed ID: 20135250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Mini-implant behavior to shear tensile forces in the porcine mandible.
    Edwards CW; Mah JK
    World J Orthod; 2010; 11(4):362-8. PubMed ID: 21491003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effects of size and insertion angle of orthodontic mini-implants on skeletal anchorage.
    Tatli U; Alraawi M; Toroğlu MS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Aug; 156(2):220-228. PubMed ID: 31375232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Orthodontic mini-implant diameter does not affect in-situ linear microcrack generation in the mandible or the maxilla.
    Liu SS; Cruz-Marroquin E; Sun J; Stewart KT; Allen MR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Dec; 142(6):768-73. PubMed ID: 23195362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Horizontal pull-out strength of orthodontic infrazygomatic mini-implant: an in vitro study.
    Chen CM; Wu JH; Lu PC; Wang HC; Lee HE; Wang CH; Du JK
    Implant Dent; 2011 Apr; 20(2):139-45. PubMed ID: 21448023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Influence of different implant materials on the primary stability of orthodontic mini-implants.
    Pan CY; Chou ST; Tseng YC; Yang YH; Wu CY; Lan TH; Liu PH; Chang HP
    Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2012 Dec; 28(12):673-8. PubMed ID: 23217360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effect of cortical bone thickness and implant placement torque on stability of orthodontic mini-implants.
    Motoyoshi M; Yoshida T; Ono A; Shimizu N
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(5):779-84. PubMed ID: 17974113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Machine-driven versus manual insertion mode: influence on primary stability of orthodontic mini-implants.
    Novsak D; Trinajstic Zrinski M; Spalj S
    Implant Dent; 2015 Feb; 24(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 25379660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Stability of connected mini-implants and miniplates for skeletal anchorage in orthodontics.
    Leung MT; Rabie AB; Wong RW
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Oct; 30(5):483-9. PubMed ID: 18458028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Mechanical loading of orthodontic miniscrews - significance and problems: an experimental study.
    Reicheneder C; Rottner K; Bokan I; Mai R; Lauer G; Richter G; Gedrange T; Proff P
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2008 Oct; 53(5):242-5. PubMed ID: 18840065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Why are mini-implants lost: the value of the implantation technique!
    Romano FL; Consolaro A
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2015; 20(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 25741821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Computed tomographic characterization of mini-implant placement pattern and maximum anchorage force in human cadavers.
    Lemieux G; Hart A; Cheretakis C; Goodmurphy C; Trexler S; McGary C; Retrouvey JM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Sep; 140(3):356-65. PubMed ID: 21889080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Quantitative assessment of orthodontic mini-implant displacement: the effect of initial force application.
    Holst AI; Karl M; Karolczak M; Goellner M; Holst S
    Quintessence Int; 2010 Jan; 41(1):59-66. PubMed ID: 19907734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 29.