123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21458395)
1. Statistical model for degraded DNA samples and adjusted probabilities for allelic drop-out.
Tvedebrink T; Eriksen PS; Mogensen HS; Morling N
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Jan; 6(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 21458395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Estimating the probability of allelic drop-out of STR alleles in forensic genetics.
Tvedebrink T; Eriksen PS; Mogensen HS; Morling N
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2009 Sep; 3(4):222-6. PubMed ID: 19647706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Estimating Y-STR allelic drop-out rates and adjusting for interlocus balances.
Andersen MM; Mogensen HS; Eriksen PS; Olofsson JK; Asplund M; Morling N
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2013 May; 7(3):327-36. PubMed ID: 23453365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Analysis of allelic drop-out using the Identifiler(®) and PowerPlex(®) 16 forensic STR typing systems.
Lohmueller KE; Rudin N; Inman K
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Sep; 12():1-11. PubMed ID: 24841801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Forensic genetic SNP typing of low-template DNA and highly degraded DNA from crime case samples.
Børsting C; Mogensen HS; Morling N
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2013 May; 7(3):345-52. PubMed ID: 23523365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Maximizing allele detection: Effects of analytical threshold and DNA levels on rates of allele and locus drop-out.
Rakay CA; Bregu J; Grgicak CM
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Dec; 6(6):723-8. PubMed ID: 22796031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validation of short tandem repeats (STRs) for forensic usage: performance testing of fluorescent multiplex STR systems and analysis of authentic and simulated forensic samples.
Moretti TR; Baumstark AL; Defenbaugh DA; Keys KM; Smerick JB; Budowle B
J Forensic Sci; 2001 May; 46(3):647-60. PubMed ID: 11373004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Tri-allelic SNP markers enable analysis of mixed and degraded DNA samples.
Westen AA; Matai AS; Laros JF; Meiland HC; Jasper M; de Leeuw WJ; de Knijff P; Sijen T
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2009 Sep; 3(4):233-41. PubMed ID: 19647708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An investigation of the robustness of the consensus method of interpreting low-template DNA profiles.
Cowen S; Debenham P; Dixon A; Kutranov S; Thomson J; Way K
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2011 Nov; 5(5):400-6. PubMed ID: 20952266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Extended PCR conditions to reduce drop-out frequencies in low template STR typing including unequal mixtures.
Weiler NE; Matai AS; Sijen T
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Jan; 6(1):102-7. PubMed ID: 21454145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Development of STR profiles from firearms and fired cartridge cases.
Horsman-Hall KM; Orihuela Y; Karczynski SL; Davis AL; Ban JD; Greenspoon SA
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2009 Sep; 3(4):242-50. PubMed ID: 19647709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Validation of a DNA mixture statistics tool incorporating allelic drop-out and drop-in.
Mitchell AA; Tamariz J; O'Connell K; Ducasse N; Budimlija Z; Prinz M; Caragine T
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Dec; 6(6):749-61. PubMed ID: 22999739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Allelic drop-out probabilities estimated by logistic regression--further considerations and practical implementation.
Tvedebrink T; Eriksen PS; Asplund M; Mogensen HS; Morling N
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Mar; 6(2):263-7. PubMed ID: 21733771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A quadruplex real-time qPCR assay for the simultaneous assessment of total human DNA, human male DNA, DNA degradation and the presence of PCR inhibitors in forensic samples: a diagnostic tool for STR typing.
Hudlow WR; Chong MD; Swango KL; Timken MD; Buoncristiani MR
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2008 Mar; 2(2):108-25. PubMed ID: 19083806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Low template STR typing: effect of replicate number and consensus method on genotyping reliability and DNA database search results.
Benschop CC; van der Beek CP; Meiland HC; van Gorp AG; Westen AA; Sijen T
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2011 Aug; 5(4):316-28. PubMed ID: 20655289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Probabilistic characterisation of baseline noise in STR profiles.
Mönich UJ; Duffy K; Médard M; Cadambe V; Alfonse LE; Grgicak C
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 Nov; 19():107-122. PubMed ID: 26218981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Statistical modeling of STR capillary electrophoresis signal.
Karkar S; Alfonse LE; Grgicak CM; Lun DS
BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 Dec; 20(Suppl 16):584. PubMed ID: 31787097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of different interpretation strategies for low template DNA mixtures.
Pfeifer CM; Klein-Unseld R; Klintschar M; Wiegand P
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Dec; 6(6):716-22. PubMed ID: 22739132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessing PreCR™ repair enzymes for restoration of STR profiles from artificially degraded DNA for human identification.
Robertson JM; Dineen SM; Scott KA; Lucyshyn J; Saeed M; Murphy DL; Schweighardt AJ; Meiklejohn KA
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Sep; 12():168-80. PubMed ID: 24997322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. STR analysis of artificially degraded DNA-results of a collaborative European exercise.
Schneider PM; Bender K; Mayr WR; Parson W; Hoste B; Decorte R; Cordonnier J; Vanek D; Morling N; Karjalainen M; Marie-Paule Carlotti C; Sabatier M; Hohoff C; Schmitter H; Pflug W; Wenzel R; Patzelt D; Lessig R; Dobrowolski P; O'Donnell G; Garafano L; Dobosz M; De Knijff P; Mevag B; Pawlowski R; Gusmão L; Conceicao Vide M; Alonso Alonso A; García Fernández O; Sanz Nicolás P; Kihlgreen A; Bär W; Meier V; Teyssier A; Coquoz R; Brandt C; Germann U; Gill P; Hallett J; Greenhalgh M
Forensic Sci Int; 2004 Jan; 139(2-3):123-34. PubMed ID: 15040905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
