BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21458652)

  • 1. Retentive force and magnetic flux leakage of magnetic attachment in various keeper and magnetic assembly combinations.
    Hasegawa M; Umekawa Y; Nagai E; Ishigami T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Apr; 105(4):266-71. PubMed ID: 21458652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Measurements of the flux densities of static magnetic fields generated by two types of dental magnetic attachments and their retentive forces].
    Xu C; Chao YL; Du L; Yang L
    Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2004 May; 35(3):412-5. PubMed ID: 15181852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of repeated insertion-removal cycles on the force and magnetic flux leakage of magnetic attachments: an in vitro study.
    Hao Z; Chao Y; Meng Y; Yin H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):235-40. PubMed ID: 24439071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Attachment systems for mandibular single-implant overdentures: an in vitro retention force investigation on different designs.
    Alsabeeha N; Atieh M; Swain MV; Payne AG
    Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(2):160-6. PubMed ID: 20305857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [The measurement of retentive force of laser-melted and cast post-keepers of Magfit magnetic attachments].
    Yang L; Du L; Lin Y
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2003 Oct; 21(5):386-8. PubMed ID: 14650998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [The measurement of retentive forces in mandibular complete overdenture with Magfit magnetic attachments].
    Du L; Xu C; Chao Y
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2003 Oct; 21(5):366-8. PubMed ID: 14650991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dental magnetic attachment: toward third generation devices.
    Tegawa Y; Kinouchi Y
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Mar; 55(3):1185-90. PubMed ID: 18334412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative study of four retentive anchor systems for implant supported overdentures--retention force changes.
    Bayer S; Steinheuser D; Grüner M; Keilig L; Enkling N; Stark H; Mues S
    Gerodontology; 2009 Dec; 26(4):268-72. PubMed ID: 19371390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Magnetic denture retention systems: inexpensive and efficient.
    Gillings BR
    Int Dent J; 1984 Sep; 34(3):184-97. PubMed ID: 6384053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of leakage flux out of a dental magnetic attachment.
    Nishida M; Tegawa Y; Kinouchi Y
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2007; 2007():3520-3. PubMed ID: 18002756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison and evaluation of leakage flux on various types of dental magnetic attachment.
    Nishida M; Tegawa Y; Kinouchi Y
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2008; 2008():2813-6. PubMed ID: 19163290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development of a self-adjusting magnetic attachment for implant overdentures.
    Maeda Y; Yang TC; Kinoshita Y
    Int J Prosthodont; 2011; 24(3):241-3. PubMed ID: 21519571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Establishment of two-dimensional magnetic field finite element analysis model of cup-yoke-type magnetic attachment].
    Lin L; Zhao Y; Gu J; Liang D
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2002 Oct; 20(5):377-9. PubMed ID: 12607373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Maximum dislodging forces of implant overdenture stud attachments.
    Petropoulos VC; Smith W
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(4):526-35. PubMed ID: 12182295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The influence of interimplant distance and attachment type on the retention characteristics of mandibular overdentures on 2 implants: initial retention values.
    Michelinakis G; Barclay CW; Smith PW
    Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(5):507-12. PubMed ID: 17323731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Overdenture retention and stabilization with ball-and-socket attachments: principles and technique.
    Banton B; Henry MD
    J Dent Technol; 1997 Sep; 14(7):14-20. PubMed ID: 9524489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical application of dental prosthesis with magnetic attachment to a patient with cerebral palsy.
    Marukawa Y; Akiyama S; Morisaki I
    J Osaka Univ Dent Sch; 1994 Dec; 34():45-9. PubMed ID: 8935093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Retention of Pt-Co magnet for dental prosthesis].
    Okuno O; Nakano T; Hamanaka H; Kinouchi Y
    Tokyo Ika Shika Daigaku Iyo Kizai Kenkyusho Hokoku; 1989; 23():1-5. PubMed ID: 2488956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Retention forces of spherical attachments as a function of implant and matrix angulation in mandibular overdentures: an in vitro study.
    Ortegón SM; Thompson GA; Agar JR; Taylor TD; Perdikis D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Apr; 101(4):231-8. PubMed ID: 19328276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Use of the integral implant for overdenture stabilization.
    Block MS; Kent JN; Finger IM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1990; 5(2):140-7. PubMed ID: 2133339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.