These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21458876)

  • 1. On the efficiency of bootstrap method into the analysis contingency table.
    Amiri S; von Rosen D
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2011 Nov; 104(2):182-7. PubMed ID: 21458876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Symmetry in square contingency tables: tests of hypotheses and confidence interval construction.
    May WL; Johnson WD
    J Biopharm Stat; 2001; 11(1-2):23-33. PubMed ID: 11459440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of tests of contingency tables.
    Amiri S; Modarres R
    J Biopharm Stat; 2017; 27(5):784-796. PubMed ID: 27936354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Tests for 2 x K contingency tables with clustered ordered categorical data.
    Jung SH; Kang SH
    Stat Med; 2001 Mar; 20(5):785-94. PubMed ID: 11241576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Efficient statistical tests to compare Youden index: accounting for contingency correlation.
    Chen F; Xue Y; Tan MT; Chen P
    Stat Med; 2015 Apr; 34(9):1560-76. PubMed ID: 25640747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bootstrap scree tests: a Monte Carlo simulation and applications to published data.
    Hong S; Mitchell SK; Harshman RA
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2006 May; 59(Pt 1):35-57. PubMed ID: 16709278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Chi 2 tests: how useful are they in the analysis of medical research data?
    Osborn JF
    Ann Ig; 1989; 1(3-4):417-32. PubMed ID: 2483622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Using the bootstrap to improve estimation and confidence intervals for regression coefficients selected using backwards variable elimination.
    Austin PC
    Stat Med; 2008 Jul; 27(17):3286-300. PubMed ID: 17940997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Use of the bootstrap in analysing cost data from cluster randomised trials: some simulation results.
    Flynn TN; Peters TJ
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2004 Nov; 4(1):33. PubMed ID: 15550169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Different methodologies to quantify uncertainties of air emissions.
    Romano D; Bernetti A; De Lauretis R
    Environ Int; 2004 Oct; 30(8):1099-107. PubMed ID: 15337355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bootstrap standard error and confidence intervals for the correlation corrected for range restriction: a simulation study.
    Chan W; Chan DW
    Psychol Methods; 2004 Sep; 9(3):369-85. PubMed ID: 15355154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Copula based prediction models: an application to an aortic regurgitation study.
    Kumar P; Shoukri MM
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2007 Jun; 7():21. PubMed ID: 17573974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Unconditional versions of several tests commonly used in the analysis of contingency tables.
    Freidlin B
    Biometrics; 1999 Mar; 55(1):264-7. PubMed ID: 11318165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multiway contingency tables: Monte Carlo resampling probability values for the chi-squared and likelihood-ratio tests.
    Long MA; Berry KJ; Mielke PW
    Psychol Rep; 2010 Oct; 107(2):501-10. PubMed ID: 21117477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bootstrap tests for overdispersion in a zero-inflated Poisson regression model.
    Jung BC; Jhun M; Lee JW
    Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):626-8; discussion 628-9. PubMed ID: 16011713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Asymptotic distribution for epistatic tests in case-control studies.
    Liu T; Thalamuthu A; Liu JJ; Chen C; Wang Z; Wu R
    Genomics; 2011 Aug; 98(2):145-51. PubMed ID: 21620949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Estimating the species accumulation curve using mixtures.
    Mao CX; Colwell RK; Chang J
    Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):433-41. PubMed ID: 16011689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A revisit to contingency table and tests of independence: bootstrap is preferred to Chi-square approximations as well as Fisher's exact test.
    Lin JJ; Chang CH; Pal N
    J Biopharm Stat; 2015; 25(3):438-58. PubMed ID: 24905809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Monte Carlo simulations.
    Earl DJ; Deem MW
    Methods Mol Biol; 2008; 443():25-36. PubMed ID: 18446280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mantel-Haenszel-type inference for cumulative odds ratios with a stratified ordinal response.
    Liu IM; Agresti A
    Biometrics; 1996 Dec; 52(4):1223-34. PubMed ID: 8962452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.