172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21459374)
1. Transvaginal versus transabdominal ultrasound guidance for embryo transfer in donor oocyte recipients: a randomized clinical trial.
Bodri D; Colodrón M; García D; Obradors A; Vernaeve V; Coll O
Fertil Steril; 2011 Jun; 95(7):2263-8, 2268.e1. PubMed ID: 21459374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Large randomized trial comparing transabdominal ultrasound-guided embryo transfer with a technique based on uterine length measurement before embryo transfer.
Revelli A; Rovei V; Dalmasso P; Gennarelli G; Racca C; Evangelista F; Benedetto C
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Sep; 48(3):289-95. PubMed ID: 26924732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Interim analysis of a randomized clinical trial comparing abdominal versus transvaginal ultrasound-guided embryo transfer.
Porat N; Boehnlein LM; Schouweiler CM; Kang J; Lindheim SR
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2010 Apr; 36(2):384-92. PubMed ID: 20492392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Transvaginal ultrasound to guide embryo transfer: a randomized controlled trial.
Karavani G; Ben-Meir A; Shufaro Y; Hyman JH; Revel A
Fertil Steril; 2017 May; 107(5):1159-1165. PubMed ID: 28347493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Transabdominal ultrasound-guided embryo transfer does not increase pregnancy rates in oocyte recipients.
García-Velasco JA; Isaza V; Martinez-Salazar J; Landazábal A; Requena A; Remohí J; Simón C
Fertil Steril; 2002 Sep; 78(3):534-9. PubMed ID: 12215329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pregnancy rates in donor oocyte cycles compared to similar autologous in vitro fertilization cycles: an analysis of 26,457 fresh cycles from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology.
Yeh JS; Steward RG; Dude AM; Shah AA; Goldfarb JM; Muasher SJ
Fertil Steril; 2014 Aug; 102(2):399-404. PubMed ID: 24842672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A prospective randomized comparison of the Wallace catheter and the Cook Echo-Tip catheter for ultrasound-guided embryo transfer.
Karande V; Hazlett D; Vietzke M; Gleicher N
Fertil Steril; 2002 Apr; 77(4):826-30. PubMed ID: 11937141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ultrasound guided aspiration of hydrosalpinx fluid versus salpingectomy in the management of patients with ultrasound visible hydrosalpinx undergoing IVF-ET: a randomized controlled trial.
Fouda UM; Sayed AM; Abdelmoty HI; Elsetohy KA
BMC Womens Health; 2015; 15():21. PubMed ID: 25783650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A prospective randomized controlled trial of 3D versus 2D ultrasound-guided embryo transfer in women undergoing ART treatment.
Saravelos SH; Kong GW; Chung JP; Mak JS; Chung CH; Cheung LP; Li TC
Hum Reprod; 2016 Oct; 31(10):2255-60. PubMed ID: 27591231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Embryo transfer using the SureView catheter-beacon in the womb.
Allahbadia GN; Kadam K; Gandhi G; Arora S; Valliappan JB; Joshi A; Allahbadia S; Wolman I
Fertil Steril; 2010 Feb; 93(2):344-50. PubMed ID: 19268930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Transabdominal ultrasound-assisted embryo transfer and pregnancy outcome.
Flisser E; Grifo JA; Krey LC; Noyes N
Fertil Steril; 2006 Feb; 85(2):353-7. PubMed ID: 16595211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Transvaginal ultrasound-guided embryo transfer improves outcome in patients with previous failed in vitro fertilization cycles.
Anderson RE; Nugent NL; Gregg AT; Nunn SL; Behr BR
Fertil Steril; 2002 Apr; 77(4):769-75. PubMed ID: 11937132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of ultrasound-guided aspiration of hydrosalpingeal fluid during oocyte retrieval on the outcomes of in vitro fertilisation-embryo transfer: a randomised controlled trial (NCT01040351).
Fouda UM; Sayed AM
Gynecol Endocrinol; 2011 Aug; 27(8):562-7. PubMed ID: 20672903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Day 4 versus day 3 embryo transfer: a prospective study of clinical outcomes.
Pantos K; Makrakis E; Chronopoulou M; Biba M; Perdikaris A; Dafereras A
Fertil Steril; 2008 Mar; 89(3):573-7. PubMed ID: 17517409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Transvaginal ultrasound-guided embryo transfer in IVF.
Larue L; Keromnes G; Massari A; Roche C; Moulin J; Gronier H; Bouret D; Cassuto NG; Ayel JP
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2017 May; 46(5):411-416. PubMed ID: 28428123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A meta-analysis of ultrasound-guided versus clinical touch embryo transfer.
Buckett WM
Fertil Steril; 2003 Oct; 80(4):1037-41. PubMed ID: 14556830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evidence of impaired endometrial receptivity after ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: a prospective randomized trial comparing fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfer in normal responders.
Shapiro BS; Daneshmand ST; Garner FC; Aguirre M; Hudson C; Thomas S
Fertil Steril; 2011 Aug; 96(2):344-8. PubMed ID: 21737072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ultrasound guidance during embryo transfer: a prospective, single-operator, randomized, controlled trial.
Eskandar M; Abou-Setta AM; Almushait MA; El-Amin M; Mohmad SE
Fertil Steril; 2008 Oct; 90(4):1187-90. PubMed ID: 18439602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of air bubbles localization and migration after embryo transfer on assisted reproductive technology outcome.
Fıçıcıoğlu C; Özcan P; Koçer MG; Yeşiladalı M; Alagöz O; Özkara G; Tayyar AT; Altunok Ç
Fertil Steril; 2018 Feb; 109(2):310-314.e1. PubMed ID: 29306491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ultrasound-guided embryo transfer does not offer any benefit in clinical outcome: a randomized controlled trial.
Kosmas IP; Janssens R; De Munck L; Al Turki H; Van der Elst J; Tournaye H; Devroey P
Hum Reprod; 2007 May; 22(5):1327-34. PubMed ID: 17289683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
