149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21459533)
1. Artificial Neural Networks for differential diagnosis of breast lesions in MR-Mammography: a systematic approach addressing the influence of network architecture on diagnostic performance using a large clinical database.
Dietzel M; Baltzer PA; Dietzel A; Zoubi R; Gröschel T; Burmeister HP; Bogdan M; Kaiser WA
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Jul; 81(7):1508-13. PubMed ID: 21459533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Breast cancer: prediction with artificial neural network based on BI-RADS standardized lexicon.
Baker JA; Kornguth PJ; Lo JY; Williford ME; Floyd CE
Radiology; 1995 Sep; 196(3):817-22. PubMed ID: 7644649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Neural network analysis of breast cancer from MRI findings.
Abdolmaleki P; Buadu LD; Murayama S; Murakami J; Hashiguchi N; Yabuuchi H; Masuda K
Radiat Med; 1997; 15(5):283-93. PubMed ID: 9445150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Artificial neural networks in mammography: application to decision making in the diagnosis of breast cancer.
Wu Y; Giger ML; Doi K; Vyborny CJ; Schmidt RA; Metz CE
Radiology; 1993 Apr; 187(1):81-7. PubMed ID: 8451441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Accuracy of artificial neural networks in radiological differential diagnosis of solitary bone lesions].
Strotzer M; Krös P; Held P; Feuerbach S
Rofo; 1995 Sep; 163(3):245-9. PubMed ID: 7548872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Artificial neural network: improving the quality of breast biopsy recommendations.
Baker JA; Kornguth PJ; Lo JY; Floyd CE
Radiology; 1996 Jan; 198(1):131-5. PubMed ID: 8539365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Use of an artificial neural network to quantitate risk of malignancy for abnormal mammograms.
Orr RK
Surgery; 2001 Apr; 129(4):459-66. PubMed ID: 11283538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Use of artificial neural networks (computer analysis) in the diagnosis of microcalcifications on mammography.
Markopoulos C; Kouskos E; Koufopoulos K; Kyriakou V; Gogas J
Eur J Radiol; 2001 Jul; 39(1):60-5. PubMed ID: 11439232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A use of a neural network to evaluate contrast enhancement curves in breast magnetic resonance images.
Vergnaghi D; Monti A; Setti E; Musumeci R
J Digit Imaging; 2001 Jun; 14(2 Suppl 1):58-9. PubMed ID: 11442122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prediction of breast cancer malignancy using an artificial neural network.
Floyd CE; Lo JY; Yun AJ; Sullivan DC; Kornguth PJ
Cancer; 1994 Dec; 74(11):2944-8. PubMed ID: 7954258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Computerized analysis of breast lesions in three dimensions using dynamic magnetic-resonance imaging.
Gilhuijs KG; Giger ML; Bick U
Med Phys; 1998 Sep; 25(9):1647-54. PubMed ID: 9775369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Case-based reasoning computer algorithm that uses mammographic findings for breast biopsy decisions.
Floyd CE; Lo JY; Tourassi GD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Nov; 175(5):1347-52. PubMed ID: 11044039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of patient history data on the prediction of breast cancer from mammographic findings with artificial neural networks.
Lo JY; Baker JA; Kornguth PJ; Floyd CE
Acad Radiol; 1999 Jan; 6(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 9891147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Predicting breast cancer invasion with artificial neural networks on the basis of mammographic features.
Lo JY; Baker JA; Kornguth PJ; Iglehart JD; Floyd CE
Radiology; 1997 Apr; 203(1):159-63. PubMed ID: 9122385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Classification of malignant and benign masses based on hybrid ART2LDA approach.
Hadjiiski L; Sahiner B; Chan HP; Petrick N; Helvie M
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1999 Dec; 18(12):1178-87. PubMed ID: 10695530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Artificial neural networks applied to survival prediction in breast cancer.
Lundin M; Lundin J; Burke HB; Toikkanen S; Pylkkänen L; Joensuu H
Oncology; 1999 Nov; 57(4):281-6. PubMed ID: 10575312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Computer-aided diagnosis of breast cancer: artificial neural network approach for optimized merging of mammographic features.
Lo JY; Baker JA; Kornguth PJ; Floyd CE
Acad Radiol; 1995 Oct; 2(10):841-50. PubMed ID: 9419649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Can follow-up controls improve the accuracy of MR mammography? A retrospective analysis of MR mammography follow-up studies].
Betsch A; Arndt E; Stern W; Wallwiener D; Claussen CD; Müller-Schimpfle M
Rofo; 2001 Jan; 173(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 11225413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A neural network approach to breast cancer diagnosis as a constraint satisfaction problem.
Tourassi GD; Markey MK; Lo JY; Floyd CE
Med Phys; 2001 May; 28(5):804-11. PubMed ID: 11393476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of dominant features on neural network performance in the classification of mammographic lesions.
Huo Z; Giger ML; Metz CE
Phys Med Biol; 1999 Oct; 44(10):2579-95. PubMed ID: 10533930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
