248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21459533)
21. Artificial neural network: improving the quality of breast biopsy recommendations.
Baker JA; Kornguth PJ; Lo JY; Floyd CE
Radiology; 1996 Jan; 198(1):131-5. PubMed ID: 8539365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Usefulness of artificial neural network for differential diagnosis of hepatic masses on CT images.
Matake K; Yoshimitsu K; Kumazawa S; Higashida Y; Irie H; Asayama Y; Nakayama T; Kakihara D; Katsuragawa S; Doi K; Honda H
Acad Radiol; 2006 Aug; 13(8):951-62. PubMed ID: 16843847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Use of an artificial neural network to quantitate risk of malignancy for abnormal mammograms.
Orr RK
Surgery; 2001 Apr; 129(4):459-66. PubMed ID: 11283538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Differences between computer-aided diagnosis of breast masses and that of calcifications.
Markey MK; Lo JY; Floyd CE
Radiology; 2002 May; 223(2):489-93. PubMed ID: 11997558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Use of artificial neural networks (computer analysis) in the diagnosis of microcalcifications on mammography.
Markopoulos C; Kouskos E; Koufopoulos K; Kyriakou V; Gogas J
Eur J Radiol; 2001 Jul; 39(1):60-5. PubMed ID: 11439232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A use of a neural network to evaluate contrast enhancement curves in breast magnetic resonance images.
Vergnaghi D; Monti A; Setti E; Musumeci R
J Digit Imaging; 2001 Jun; 14(2 Suppl 1):58-9. PubMed ID: 11442122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Prediction of breast cancer malignancy using an artificial neural network.
Floyd CE; Lo JY; Yun AJ; Sullivan DC; Kornguth PJ
Cancer; 1994 Dec; 74(11):2944-8. PubMed ID: 7954258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Computerized analysis of breast lesions in three dimensions using dynamic magnetic-resonance imaging.
Gilhuijs KG; Giger ML; Bick U
Med Phys; 1998 Sep; 25(9):1647-54. PubMed ID: 9775369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Application of an artificial neural network to high-resolution CT: usefulness in differential diagnosis of diffuse lung disease.
Fukushima A; Ashizawa K; Yamaguchi T; Matsuyama N; Hayashi H; Kida I; Imafuku Y; Egawa A; Kimura S; Nagaoki K; Honda S; Katsuragawa S; Doi K; Hayashi K
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Aug; 183(2):297-305. PubMed ID: 15269016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Case-based reasoning computer algorithm that uses mammographic findings for breast biopsy decisions.
Floyd CE; Lo JY; Tourassi GD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Nov; 175(5):1347-52. PubMed ID: 11044039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparative analysis of logistic regression and artificial neural network for computer-aided diagnosis of breast masses.
Song JH; Venkatesh SS; Conant EA; Arger PH; Sehgal CM
Acad Radiol; 2005 Apr; 12(4):487-95. PubMed ID: 15831423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Effect of patient history data on the prediction of breast cancer from mammographic findings with artificial neural networks.
Lo JY; Baker JA; Kornguth PJ; Floyd CE
Acad Radiol; 1999 Jan; 6(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 9891147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Selection of an optimal neural network architecture for computer-aided detection of microcalcifications--comparison of automated optimization techniques.
Gurcan MN; Sahiner B; Chan HP; Hadjiiski L; Petrick N
Med Phys; 2001 Sep; 28(9):1937-48. PubMed ID: 11585225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A preliminary study on computerized lesion localization in MR mammography using 3D nMITR maps, multilayer cellular neural networks, and fuzzy c-partitioning.
Ertas G; Gulcur HO; Tunaci M; Osman O; Ucan ON
Med Phys; 2008 Jan; 35(1):195-205. PubMed ID: 18293575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. An artificial neural network for predicting the incidence of radiation pneumonitis.
Su M; Miften M; Whiddon C; Sun X; Light K; Marks L
Med Phys; 2005 Feb; 32(2):318-25. PubMed ID: 15789575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Computer-aided diagnosis for the differentiation of malignant from benign thyroid nodules on ultrasonography.
Lim KJ; Choi CS; Yoon DY; Chang SK; Kim KK; Han H; Kim SS; Lee J; Jeon YH
Acad Radiol; 2008 Jul; 15(7):853-8. PubMed ID: 18572120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The prediction of breast cancer biopsy outcomes using two CAD approaches that both emphasize an intelligible decision process.
Elter M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Wittenberg T
Med Phys; 2007 Nov; 34(11):4164-72. PubMed ID: 18072480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Predicting breast cancer invasion with artificial neural networks on the basis of mammographic features.
Lo JY; Baker JA; Kornguth PJ; Iglehart JD; Floyd CE
Radiology; 1997 Apr; 203(1):159-63. PubMed ID: 9122385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Classification of malignant and benign masses based on hybrid ART2LDA approach.
Hadjiiski L; Sahiner B; Chan HP; Petrick N; Helvie M
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1999 Dec; 18(12):1178-87. PubMed ID: 10695530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Artificial neural networks applied to survival prediction in breast cancer.
Lundin M; Lundin J; Burke HB; Toikkanen S; Pylkkänen L; Joensuu H
Oncology; 1999 Nov; 57(4):281-6. PubMed ID: 10575312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
