BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21459622)

  • 1. Implicit processing of tactile information: evidence from the tactile change detection paradigm.
    Pritchett D; Gallace A; Spence C
    Conscious Cogn; 2011 Sep; 20(3):534-46. PubMed ID: 21459622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Lost in the move? Secondary task performance impairs tactile change detection on the body.
    Gallace A; Zeeden S; Röder B; Spence C
    Conscious Cogn; 2010 Mar; 19(1):215-29. PubMed ID: 19647451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Crossmodal change blindness between vision and touch.
    Auvray M; Gallace A; Tan HZ; Spence C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2007 Oct; 126(2):79-97. PubMed ID: 17187750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Tactile and visual distractors induce change blindness for tactile stimuli presented on the fingertips.
    Auvray M; Gallace A; Hartcher-O'Brien J; Tan HZ; Spence C
    Brain Res; 2008 Jun; 1213():111-9. PubMed ID: 18448084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. When visual transients impair tactile change detection: a novel case of crossmodal change blindness?
    Gallace A; Auvray M; Tan HZ; Spence C
    Neurosci Lett; 2006 May; 398(3):280-5. PubMed ID: 16480821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. When seeing doesn't matter: assessing the after-effects of tactile distractor processing in the blind and the sighted.
    Frings C; Amendt A; Spence C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Aug; 37(4):1174-81. PubMed ID: 21553991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Tactile short-term memory for stimuli presented on the fingertips and across the rest of the body surface.
    Auvray M; Gallace A; Spence C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 May; 73(4):1227-41. PubMed ID: 21336517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An ERP investigation on visuotactile interactions in peripersonal and extrapersonal space: evidence for the spatial rule.
    Sambo CF; Forster B
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Aug; 21(8):1550-9. PubMed ID: 18767919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Implicit learning for probable changes in a visual change detection task.
    Beck MR; Angelone BL; Levin DT; Peterson MS; Varakin DA
    Conscious Cogn; 2008 Dec; 17(4):1192-208. PubMed ID: 18684642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Event-related brain potential evidence for implicit change detection: a replication of Fernandez-Duque et al. (2003).
    Kimura M; Katayama J; Ohira H
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Dec; 448(3):236-9. PubMed ID: 18973794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Change detection evokes a Simon-like effect.
    Galfano G; Mazza V; Tamè L; Umiltà C; Turatto M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Jan; 127(1):186-96. PubMed ID: 17573027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Event-related potential evidence for the use of external coordinates in the preparation of tactile attention by the early blind.
    Eardley AF; van Velzen J
    Eur J Neurosci; 2011 May; 33(10):1897-907. PubMed ID: 21545656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Short term memory for tactile stimuli.
    Gallace A; Tan HZ; Haggard P; Spence C
    Brain Res; 2008 Jan; 1190():132-42. PubMed ID: 18083147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Does the sight of physical threat induce a tactile processing bias? Modality-specific attentional facilitation induced by viewing threatening pictures.
    Van Damme S; Gallace A; Spence C; Crombez G; Moseley GL
    Brain Res; 2009 Feb; 1253():100-6. PubMed ID: 19094970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Investigating the time course of tactile reflexive attention using a non-spatial discrimination task.
    Miles E; Poliakoff E; Brown RJ
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Jun; 128(2):210-5. PubMed ID: 18262498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Tactile remapping beyond space.
    Azañón E; Camacho K; Soto-Faraco S
    Eur J Neurosci; 2010 May; 31(10):1858-67. PubMed ID: 20584190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Auditory, tactile, and multisensory cues facilitate search for dynamic visual stimuli.
    Ngo MK; Spence C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Aug; 72(6):1654-65. PubMed ID: 20675808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Change blindness and visual memory: visual representations get rich and act poor.
    Varakin DA; Levin DT
    Br J Psychol; 2006 Feb; 97(Pt 1):51-77. PubMed ID: 16464287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Poke and pop: tactile-visual synchrony increases visual saliency.
    Van der Burg E; Olivers CN; Bronkhorst AW; Theeuwes J
    Neurosci Lett; 2009 Jan; 450(1):60-4. PubMed ID: 19013216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Spatial patterns in tactile perception: is there a tactile field?
    Haggard P; Giovagnoli G
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 May; 137(1):65-75. PubMed ID: 21470584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.