These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

322 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21460345)

  • 21. Involving users in service planning: a focus group approach.
    Kelly L; Caldwell K; Henshaw L
    Eur J Oncol Nurs; 2006 Sep; 10(4):283-93. PubMed ID: 16600685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Setting priorities for local services.
    Strong L
    Prof Nurse; 2003 May; 18(9):486-7. PubMed ID: 12764954
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The INCENTIVE protocol: an evaluation of the organisation and delivery of NHS dental healthcare to patients-innovation in the commissioning of primary dental care service delivery and organisation in the UK.
    Pavitt SH; Baxter PD; Brunton PA; Douglas G; Edlin R; Gibson BJ; Godson J; Hall M; Porritt J; Robinson PG; Vinall K; Hulme C
    BMJ Open; 2014 Sep; 4(9):e005931. PubMed ID: 25231492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Clinicians, market players or bureaucrats? Changing expectations of the general practitioner role in the English and Welsh NHS, 1991-2005.
    Abbott S; Procter S; Iacovou N
    J Health Organ Manag; 2008; 22(5):433-45. PubMed ID: 18959297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Clinical focus and public accountability in English NHS Trust Board meetings.
    Endacott R; Sheaff R; Jones R; Woodward V
    J Health Serv Res Policy; 2013 Jan; 18(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 23393037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Governance of integrated delivery systems/networks: a stakeholder approach.
    Savage GT; Taylor RL; Rotarius TM; Buesseler JA
    Health Care Manage Rev; 1997; 22(1):7-20. PubMed ID: 9058084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. How should cost-effectiveness analysis be used in health technology coverage decisions? Evidence from the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence approach.
    Williams I; Bryan S; McIver S
    J Health Serv Res Policy; 2007 Apr; 12(2):73-9. PubMed ID: 17407655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The use of standard contracts in the English National Health Service: a case study analysis.
    Petsoulas C; Allen P; Hughes D; Vincent-Jones P; Roberts J
    Soc Sci Med; 2011 Jul; 73(2):185-92. PubMed ID: 21684643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Commissioners struggle to cut back on services, survey finds.
    Tasker F
    BMJ; 2011 Sep; 343():d5961. PubMed ID: 21930822
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Implementation of case management in long-term conditions in England: survey and case studies.
    Challis D; Hughes J; Berzins K; Reilly S; Abell J; Stewart K; Bowns I
    J Health Serv Res Policy; 2011 Apr; 16 Suppl 1():8-13. PubMed ID: 21460344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Exit, voice, governance and user-responsiveness: the case of English primary care trusts.
    Pickard S; Sheaff R; Dowling B
    Soc Sci Med; 2006 Jul; 63(2):373-83. PubMed ID: 16472899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Chronic care in the English National Health Service: progress and challenges.
    Ham C
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2009; 28(1):190-201. PubMed ID: 19124870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A comparative review of clinical governance arrangements in the UK.
    Pridmore JA; Gammon J
    Br J Nurs; 2007 Jun 28-Jul 11; 16(12):720-3. PubMed ID: 17851360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The dynamics of commissioning across organisational and clinical boundaries.
    Baxter K; Weiss M; Le Grand J
    J Health Organ Manag; 2008; 22(2):111-28. PubMed ID: 18700523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. "It's a complex mesh"- how large-scale health system reorganisation affected the delivery of the immunisation programme in England: a qualitative study.
    Chantler T; Lwembe S; Saliba V; Raj T; Mays N; Ramsay M; Mounier-Jack S
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2016 Sep; 16():489. PubMed ID: 27633653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Clinical governance.
    Wilson J
    Br J Nurs; 1998 Sep 10-23; 7(16):987-8. PubMed ID: 9830912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The impact of research governance in the United Kingdom on research involving a national survey.
    Cook M; Cook G; Hodgson P; Reed J; Clarke C; Inglis P
    J Health Organ Manag; 2007; 21(1):59-67. PubMed ID: 17455813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. How are clinical commissioning groups managing conflicts of interest under primary care co-commissioning in England? A qualitative analysis.
    Moran V; Allen P; McDermott I; Checkland K; Warwick-Giles L; Gore O; Bramwell D; Coleman A
    BMJ Open; 2017 Nov; 7(11):e018422. PubMed ID: 29122801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. GP leadership in clinical commissioning groups: a qualitative multi-case study approach across England.
    Marshall M; Holti R; Hartley J; Matharu T; Storey J
    Br J Gen Pract; 2018 Jun; 68(671):e427-e432. PubMed ID: 29739777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Learning from people with long-term conditions: new insights for governance in primary healthcare.
    Ross F; Smith P; Byng R; Christian S; Allan H; Price L; Brearley S
    Health Soc Care Community; 2014 Jul; 22(4):405-16. PubMed ID: 24612289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.