These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21460665)

  • 1. Objective scar assessment tools: a clinimetric appraisal.
    Verhaegen PDHM; van der Wal MBA; Middelkoop E; van Zuijlen PPM
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2011 Apr; 127(4):1561-1570. PubMed ID: 21460665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Current tools for noninvasive objective assessment of skin scars.
    Perry DM; McGrouther DA; Bayat A
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2010 Sep; 126(3):912-923. PubMed ID: 20811225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Scar assessment scales: a dermatologic overview.
    Idriss N; Maibach HI
    Skin Res Technol; 2009 Feb; 15(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 19152571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A clinimetric overview of scar assessment scales.
    van der Wal MB; Verhaegen PD; Middelkoop E; van Zuijlen PP
    J Burn Care Res; 2012; 33(2):e79-87. PubMed ID: 22249102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinimetric properties and clinical utility in rehabilitation of postsurgical scar rating scales: a systematic review.
    Vercelli S; Ferriero G; Sartorio F; Cisari C; Bravini E
    Int J Rehabil Res; 2015 Dec; 38(4):279-86. PubMed ID: 26426285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Measurement of vascularity in the scar: A systematic review.
    Deng H; Li-Tsang CWP
    Burns; 2019 Sep; 45(6):1253-1265. PubMed ID: 30545695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A systematic review of the quality of burn scar rating scales for clinical and research use.
    Tyack Z; Simons M; Spinks A; Wasiak J
    Burns; 2012 Feb; 38(1):6-18. PubMed ID: 22047828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Objective color measurements: clinimetric performance of three devices on normal skin and scar tissue.
    van der Wal M; Bloemen M; Verhaegen P; Tuinebreijer W; de Vet H; van Zuijlen P; Middelkoop E
    J Burn Care Res; 2013; 34(3):e187-94. PubMed ID: 23237819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Burn scar assessment: a systematic review of different scar scales.
    Brusselaers N; Pirayesh A; Hoeksema H; Verbelen J; Blot S; Monstrey S
    J Surg Res; 2010 Nov; 164(1):e115-23. PubMed ID: 20828761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A clinimetric assessment of the validity and reliability of 3D technology for scar surface area measurement.
    Doomen MCHA; Rijpma D; Pijpe A; Meij-de Vries A; Niessen FB; Karaoglu S; de Vet HCW; Gevers T; van Zuijlen PPM
    Burns; 2023 May; 49(3):583-594. PubMed ID: 36764836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Burn scar assessment: A systematic review of objective scar assessment tools.
    Brusselaers N; Pirayesh A; Hoeksema H; Verbelen J; Blot S; Monstrey S
    Burns; 2010 Dec; 36(8):1157-64. PubMed ID: 20488623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Scar assessment tools: implications for current research.
    van Zuijlen PP; Angeles AP; Kreis RW; Bos KE; Middelkoop E
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2002 Mar; 109(3):1108-22. PubMed ID: 11884845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reliable and feasible evaluation of linear scars by the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale.
    van de Kar AL; Corion LU; Smeulders MJ; Draaijers LJ; van der Horst CM; van Zuijlen PP
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2005 Aug; 116(2):514-22. PubMed ID: 16079683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. New Atrophic Acne Scar Classification: Reliability of Assessments Based on Size, Shape, and Number.
    Kang S; Lozada VT; Bettoli V; Tan J; Rueda MJ; Layton A; Petit L; Dréno B
    J Drugs Dermatol; 2016 Jun; 15(6):693-702. PubMed ID: 27272075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Scar assessment: current problems and future solutions.
    Powers PS; Sarkar S; Goldgof DB; Cruse CW; Tsap LV
    J Burn Care Rehabil; 1999; 20(1 Pt 1):54-60; discussion 53. PubMed ID: 9934638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Subjective Tools for Burn Scar Assessment: An Integrative Review.
    da Costa PTL; Echevarría-Guanilo ME; Gonçalves N; Girondi JBR; Gonçalves ADC
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2021 Jun; 34(6):1-10. PubMed ID: 33979826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Three-dimensional digital stereophotogrammetry: a reliable and valid technique for measuring scar surface area.
    Stekelenburg CM; van der Wal MBA; Knol DL; de Vet HCW; van Zuijlen PPM
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2013 Jul; 132(1):204-211. PubMed ID: 23806921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reliability of scar assessments performed with an integrated skin testing device - the DermaLab Combo(®).
    Gankande TU; Duke JM; Danielsen PL; DeJong HM; Wood FM; Wallace HJ
    Burns; 2014 Dec; 40(8):1521-9. PubMed ID: 24630817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Objective measurement of hypertrophic burn scar: a preliminary study of tonometry and ultrasonography.
    Katz SM; Frank DH; Leopold GR; Wachtel TL
    Ann Plast Surg; 1985 Feb; 14(2):121-7. PubMed ID: 3888034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A prospective randomized evaluation of scar assessment measures.
    Brandt MG; Moore CC; Micomonaco D; Fung K; Franklin JH; Yoo J; Doyle PC
    Laryngoscope; 2009 May; 119(5):841-5. PubMed ID: 19266588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.