These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21461883)
1. In vivo evaluation of stent patency by 64-slice multidetector CT coronary angiography: shall we do it or not? Zhang J; Li M; Lu Z; Hang J; Pan J; Sun L Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Mar; 28(3):651-8. PubMed ID: 21461883 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of coronary artery in-stent patency using 64-slice computed tomography. Zhao J; Zheng LL; Yang Y Coron Artery Dis; 2011 Dec; 22(8):540-52. PubMed ID: 21959714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of post-intervention minimal stent area on 9-month follow-up patency of paclitaxel-eluting stents: an integrated intravascular ultrasound analysis from the TAXUS IV, V, and VI and TAXUS ATLAS Workhorse, Long Lesion, and Direct Stent Trials. Doi H; Maehara A; Mintz GS; Yu A; Wang H; Mandinov L; Popma JJ; Ellis SG; Grube E; Dawkins KD; Weissman NJ; Turco MA; Ormiston JA; Stone GW JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2009 Dec; 2(12):1269-75. PubMed ID: 20129555 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Coronary in-stent restenosis: predisposing clinical and stent-related factors, diagnostic performance and analyses of inaccuracies in 320-row computed tomography angiography. Wan YL; Tsay PK; Chen CC; Juan YH; Huang YC; Chan WH; Wen MS; Hsieh IC Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Jun; 32 Suppl 1():105-15. PubMed ID: 27106698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In-stent area stenosis on 64-slice multi-detector computed tomography coronary angiography: optimal cutoff value for minimum lumen cross-sectional area of coronary stents compared with intravascular ultrasound. Kwon W; Choi J; Kim JY; Kim SY; Yoon J; Choe KH; Lee SH; Ahn SG Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Jun; 28 Suppl 1():21-31. PubMed ID: 22562285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice multidetector computed tomographic coronary angiography versus invasive coronary angiography versus intravascular ultrasound for evaluation of in-stent restenosis. Andreini D; Pontone G; Bartorelli AL; Trabattoni D; Mushtaq S; Bertella E; Annoni A; Formenti A; Cortinovis S; Montorsi P; Veglia F; Ballerini G; Pepi M Am J Cardiol; 2009 May; 103(10):1349-58. PubMed ID: 19427427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice multidetector CT angiography for detection of in-stent restenosis of vertebral artery ostium stents: comparison with conventional angiography. Lee YJ; Lim YS; Lim HW; Yoo WJ; Choi BG; Kim BS Acta Radiol; 2014 Oct; 55(8):1000-7. PubMed ID: 24107930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of coronary in-stent restenosis: value of subtraction coronary computed tomography angiography. Amanuma M; Kondo T; Sano T; Takayanagi T; Matsutani H; Sekine T; Arai T; Morita H; Ishizaka K; Arakita K; Iwasa A; Takase S Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Apr; 32(4):661-70. PubMed ID: 26662268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Multislice spiral computed tomography for the evaluation of stent patency after left main coronary artery stenting: a comparison with conventional coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. Van Mieghem CA; Cademartiri F; Mollet NR; Malagutti P; Valgimigli M; Meijboom WB; Pugliese F; McFadden EP; Ligthart J; Runza G; Bruining N; Smits PC; Regar E; van der Giessen WJ; Sianos G; van Domburg R; de Jaegere P; Krestin GP; Serruys PW; de Feyter PJ Circulation; 2006 Aug; 114(7):645-53. PubMed ID: 16894038 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of coronary flow velocity reserve measurement by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography with 320-row multidetector computed tomographic coronary angiography in the detection of in-stent restenosis in the three major coronary arteries. Kakuta K; Dohi K; Yamada T; Yamanaka T; Kawamura M; Nakamori S; Nakajima H; Tanigawa T; Onishi K; Yamada N; Nakamura M; Nobori T; Ito M Am J Cardiol; 2012 Jul; 110(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 22459305 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Diagnostic value of 320-slice computed tomography coronary angiography to assess in-stent restenosis]. Wang J; Chen XM; Wang SH; Ye HH; Cui HB; Du WP; Zhou HL; Feng MJ; Pan YN; Lin SY Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi; 2012 Jun; 40(6):487-91. PubMed ID: 22943643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnostic accuracy of 320-row multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography to noninvasively assess in-stent restenosis. de Graaf FR; Schuijf JD; van Velzen JE; Boogers MJ; Kroft LJ; de Roos A; Reiber JH; Sieders A; Spanó F; Jukema JW; Schalij MJ; van der Wall EE; Bax JJ Invest Radiol; 2010 Jun; 45(6):331-40. PubMed ID: 20404736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impairment factors for evaluating the patency of drug-eluting stents and bare metal stents in coronary arteries by 64-slice computed tomography versus conventional coronary angiography. Nakamura K; Funabashi N; Uehara M; Suzuki K; Terao M; Okubo K; Mita Y; Maeda F; Komuro I Int J Cardiol; 2008 Nov; 130(3):349-56. PubMed ID: 18180050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of coronary artery in-stent restenosis by 64-section computed tomography: factors affecting assessment and accurate diagnosis. Chung SH; Kim YJ; Hur J; Lee HJ; Choe KO; Kim TH; Choi BW J Thorac Imaging; 2010 Feb; 25(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 20160604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnostic accuracy of coronary in-stent restenosis using 64-slice computed tomography: comparison with invasive coronary angiography. Ehara M; Kawai M; Surmely JF; Matsubara T; Terashima M; Tsuchikane E; Kinoshita Y; Ito T; Takeda Y; Nasu K; Tanaka N; Murata A; Fujita H; Sato K; Kodama A; Katoh O; Suzuki T J Am Coll Cardiol; 2007 Mar; 49(9):951-9. PubMed ID: 17336718 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Angiography and Optical Coherence Tomography Assessment of the Drug-Coated Balloon ESSENTIAL for the Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis. de la Torre Hernández JM; Garcia Camarero T; Lozano Ruiz-Poveda F; Urbano-Carrillo CA; Sánchez Pérez I; Cano-García M; Saez R; Andrés Morist A; Molina E; Pinar E; Torres A; Lezcano EJ; Gutierrez H; Arnold RJ; Zueco J Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2020 Apr; 21(4):508-513. PubMed ID: 31401071 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reduced risk of restenosis in small vessels and reduced risk of myocardial infarction in long lesions with the new thin-strut TAXUS Liberté stent: 1-year results from the TAXUS ATLAS program. Turco MA; Ormiston JA; Popma JJ; Hall JJ; Mann T; Cannon LA; Webster MW; Mishkel GJ; O'Shaughnessy CD; McGarry TF; Mandinov L; Dawkins KD; Baim DS JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2008 Dec; 1(6):699-709. PubMed ID: 19463387 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Late-term clinical outcomes with zotarolimus- and sirolimus-eluting stents. 5-year follow-up of the ENDEAVOR III (A Randomized Controlled Trial of the Medtronic Endeavor Drug [ABT-578] Eluting Coronary Stent System Versus the Cypher Sirolimus-Eluting Coronary Stent System in De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions). Kandzari DE; Mauri L; Popma JJ; Turco MA; Gurbel PA; Fitzgerald PJ; Leon MB JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 May; 4(5):543-50. PubMed ID: 21596327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]