These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21462013)

  • 1. Auditory rightward spatial bias varies as a function of age.
    Takio F; Koivisto M; Laukka SJ; Hämäläinen H
    Dev Neuropsychol; 2011; 36(3):367-87. PubMed ID: 21462013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Visual rightward spatial bias varies as a function of age.
    Takio F; Koivisto M; Tuominen T; Laukka SJ; Hämäläinen H
    Laterality; 2013; 18(1):44-67. PubMed ID: 23231544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of prismatic adaptation on spatial gradients in unilateral neglect: A comparison of visual and auditory target detection with central attentional load.
    Eramudugolla R; Boyce A; Irvine DR; Mattingley JB
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jul; 48(9):2681-92. PubMed ID: 20478321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of age on attentional modulation in Dichotic listening.
    Takio F; Koivisto M; Jokiranta L; Rashid F; Kallio J; Tuominen T; Laukka SJ; Hämäläinen H
    Dev Neuropsychol; 2009; 34(3):225-39. PubMed ID: 19437200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Age-dependent impairment of auditory processing under spatially focused and divided attention: an electrophysiological study.
    Wild-Wall N; Falkenstein M
    Biol Psychol; 2010 Jan; 83(1):27-36. PubMed ID: 19799963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Development of attentional control of verbal auditory perception from middle to late childhood: comparisons to healthy aging.
    Passow S; Müller M; Westerhausen R; Hugdahl K; Wartenburger I; Heekeren HR; Lindenberger U; Li SC
    Dev Psychol; 2013 Oct; 49(10):1982-93. PubMed ID: 23276126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Age effects in identifying and localising dichotic stimuli: a corpus callosum deficit?
    Gootjes L; Van Strien JW; Bouma A
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2004 Sep; 26(6):826-37. PubMed ID: 15370378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Age-related changes in visual pseudoneglect.
    Schmitz R; Peigneux P
    Brain Cogn; 2011 Aug; 76(3):382-9. PubMed ID: 21536360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Attention is required for acquisition but not expression of new response biases.
    Miles JD; Proctor RW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Nov; 36(6):1554-60. PubMed ID: 20822305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Auditory location in the irrelevant sound effect: The effects of presenting auditory stimuli to either the left ear, right ear or both ears.
    Hadlington L; Bridges AM; Darby RJ
    Brain Cogn; 2004 Aug; 55(3):545-57. PubMed ID: 15223201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Automatic selective attention as a function of sensory modality in aging.
    Guerreiro MJ; Adam JJ; Van Gerven PW
    J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci; 2012 Mar; 67(2):194-202. PubMed ID: 21798856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Human aging compromises attentional control of auditory perception.
    Passow S; Westerhausen R; Wartenburger I; Hugdahl K; Heekeren HR; Lindenberger U; Li SC
    Psychol Aging; 2012 Mar; 27(1):99-105. PubMed ID: 21988156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interactions between voluntary and stimulus-driven spatial attention mechanisms across sensory modalities.
    Santangelo V; Olivetti Belardinelli M; Spence C; Macaluso E
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Dec; 21(12):2384-97. PubMed ID: 19199406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The nature of auditory discrimination problems in children with specific language impairment: an MMN study.
    Davids N; Segers E; van den Brink D; Mitterer H; van Balkom H; Hagoort P; Verhoeven L
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jan; 49(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 21070793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Selective attention to spatial and non-spatial visual stimuli is affected differentially by age: effects on event-related brain potentials and performance data.
    Talsma D; Kok A; Ridderinkhof KR
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Nov; 62(2):249-61. PubMed ID: 16806547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Spatial coincidence modulates the Colavita visual dominance effect.
    Koppen C; Spence C
    Neurosci Lett; 2007 May; 417(2):107-11. PubMed ID: 17408855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Further evidence that congenitally blind participants react faster to auditory and tactile spatial targets.
    Collignon O; De Volder AG
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2009 Dec; 63(4):287-93. PubMed ID: 20025387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stimulus- and state-dependence of systematic bias in spatial attention: additive effects of stimulus-size and time-on-task.
    Benwell CS; Harvey M; Gardner S; Thut G
    Cortex; 2013 Mar; 49(3):827-36. PubMed ID: 22270326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reorganisation of the right occipito-parietal stream for auditory spatial processing in early blind humans. A transcranial magnetic stimulation study.
    Collignon O; Davare M; Olivier E; De Volder AG
    Brain Topogr; 2009 May; 21(3-4):232-40. PubMed ID: 19199020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Endogenous auditory spatial attention modulates obligatory sensory activity in auditory cortex.
    Power AJ; Lalor EC; Reilly RB
    Cereb Cortex; 2011 Jun; 21(6):1223-30. PubMed ID: 21068187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.