These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21462151)
1. Birmingham hip resurfacing in patients who are seventy years of age or older. Carrothers AD; Gilbert RE; Richardson JB Hip Int; 2011; 21(2):217-24. PubMed ID: 21462151 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Functional results of isolated femoral revision of hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Gilbert RE; Cheung G; Carrothers AD; Meyer C; Richardson JB J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2010 Jul; 92(7):1600-4. PubMed ID: 20595565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Birmingham hip resurfacing at a mean of ten years: results from an independent centre. Coulter G; Young DA; Dalziel RE; Shimmin AJ J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Mar; 94(3):315-21. PubMed ID: 22371536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Independent predictors of revision following metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: a retrospective cohort study using National Joint Registry data. Jameson SS; Baker PN; Mason J; Porter ML; Deehan DJ; Reed MR J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Jun; 94(6):746-54. PubMed ID: 22628587 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Five to Ten-Year Results of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing Implant in the U.S.: A Single Institution's Experience. Ford MC; Hellman MD; Kazarian GS; Clohisy JC; Nunley RM; Barrack RL J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2018 Nov; 100(21):1879-1887. PubMed ID: 30399083 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A medium-term comparison of hybrid hip replacement and Birmingham hip resurfacing in active young patients. Baker RP; Pollard TC; Eastaugh-Waring SJ; Bannister GC J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2011 Feb; 93(2):158-63. PubMed ID: 21282752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Survivorship and clinical outcome of Birmingham hip resurfacing: a minimum ten years' follow-up. Azam MQ; McMahon S; Hawdon G; Sankineani SR Int Orthop; 2016 Jan; 40(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 25820838 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. High rate of fracture in the cementless modular Extrême™ (Mark I) femoral prosthesis in revision total hip arthroplasty: 33 cases at more than 5 years' follow-up. Benoist J; Lambotte JC; Polard JL; Huten D Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2013 Dec; 99(8):915-21. PubMed ID: 24211127 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Short-term Results of Birmingham Hip Resurfacing in the United States. Nam D; Nunley RM; Ruh EL; Engh CA; Rogerson JS; Brooks PJ; Raterman SJ; Su EP; Barrack RL Orthopedics; 2015 Aug; 38(8):e715-21. PubMed ID: 26270759 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An 18-year comparison of hybrid total hip replacement and Birmingham hip resurfacing in active young patients. Jonas SC; Whitehouse MR; Bick S; Bannister GC; Baker RP Hip Int; 2019 Nov; 29(6):630-637. PubMed ID: 30672350 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Short and mid-term outcomes and functional results in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty at 5 years follow-up: the Spanish experience. Pérez-Moro OS; Fernández-Cuadros ME; Neira-Borrajo I; Aranda-Izquierdo E; Albaladejo-Florin MJ; Llopis-Miró R BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 Apr; 20(1):172. PubMed ID: 30992064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Function and survival after revision of hip resurfacing. Jaiswal A; Gilbert RE; Sunil Kumar KH; Carrothers AD; Kuiper JH; Richardson JB Hip Int; 2011; 21(5):610-5. PubMed ID: 21960447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Metal ion levels from well-functioning Birmingham Hip Resurfacings decline significantly at ten years. Van Der Straeten C; Van Quickenborne D; De Roest B; Calistri A; Victor J; De Smet K Bone Joint J; 2013 Oct; 95-B(10):1332-8. PubMed ID: 24078528 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Results of Birmingham hip resurfacing at 12 to 15 years: a single-surgeon series. Daniel J; Pradhan C; Ziaee H; Pynsent PB; McMinn DJ Bone Joint J; 2014 Oct; 96-B(10):1298-306. PubMed ID: 25274912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mid-Term Results and Predictors of Patient-Reported Outcomes of Birmingham Hip Resurfacing. Oak SR; Strnad GJ; O'Rourke C; Higuera CA; Spindler KP; Brooks PJ J Arthroplasty; 2017 Jan; 32(1):110-118. PubMed ID: 27480827 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Are Females at Greater Risk for Revision Surgery After Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty With the Articular Surface Replacement Prosthesis? Donahue GS; Lindgren V; Galea VP; Madanat R; Muratoglu O; Malchau H Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Oct; 474(10):2257-65. PubMed ID: 27121872 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Hip resurfacing before 50years of age: A prospective study of 979 hips with a mean follow-up of 5.1years. Girard J; Lons A; Ramdane N; Putman S Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2018 May; 104(3):295-299. PubMed ID: 29277514 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The outcome of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing in patients aged < 50 years up to 14 years post-operatively. Matharu GS; McBryde CW; Pynsent WB; Pynsent PB; Treacy RB Bone Joint J; 2013 Sep; 95-B(9):1172-7. PubMed ID: 23997127 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical, functional and radiographic long-term follow-up (7-12 years) of Birmingham Hip Resurfacing, including metal ions evaluation: a single surgeon series. Ouwendijk M; VAN DER Bracht H; Jansegers E Acta Orthop Belg; 2024 Mar; 90(1):41-45. PubMed ID: 38669647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Long-term results of Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty in Asian patients. Uemura K; Takao M; Hamada H; Sakai T; Ohzono K; Sugano N J Artif Organs; 2018 Mar; 21(1):117-123. PubMed ID: 28856453 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]