70 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21462253)
1. Assessment of the accuracy of infrared and electromagnetic navigation using an industrial robot: Which factors are influencing the accuracy of navigation?
Liodakis E; Chu K; Westphal R; Krettek C; Citak M; Gosling T; Kenawey M
J Orthop Res; 2011 Oct; 29(10):1476-83. PubMed ID: 21462253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mini-navigator: a new system for navigated deformity corrections.
Liodakis E; Macke C; Kenawey M; Krettek C
Int J Med Robot; 2012 Sep; 8(3):319-26. PubMed ID: 22374864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The accuracy and precision of computer assisted surgery in the assessment of frontal plane deviations of the lower extremity: a femoral fracture model.
Khalafi A; Citak M; Kendoff D; Huefner T; Krettek C
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2009 Sep; 129(9):1183-7. PubMed ID: 19172286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of navigation: a comparative study of infrared optical and electromagnetic navigation.
Song EK; Seon JK; Park SJ; Yoon TR
Orthopedics; 2008 Oct; 31(10 Suppl 1):. PubMed ID: 19298030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of optical and electromagnetic computer-assisted navigation systems for fluoroscopic targeting.
Ricci WM; Russell TA; Kahler DM; Terrill-Grisoni L; Culley P
J Orthop Trauma; 2008 Mar; 22(3):190-4. PubMed ID: 18317053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. How does electromagnetic navigation stack up against infrared navigation in minimally invasive total knee arthroplasties?
Lionberger DR; Weise J; Ho DM; Haddad JL
J Arthroplasty; 2008 Jun; 23(4):573-80. PubMed ID: 18514877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Computer-assisted total-knee arthroplasty. Comparison of two successive systems. Learning curve].
Bové JC
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2008 May; 94(3):252-60. PubMed ID: 18456060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Electromagnetic navigation improves minimally invasive robot-assisted lung brachytherapy.
Lin AW; Trejos AL; Mohan S; Bassan H; Kashigar A; Patel RV; Malthaner RA
Comput Aided Surg; 2008 Mar; 13(2):114-23. PubMed ID: 18317960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An automated robotic approach with redundant navigation for minimal invasive extended transsphenoidal skull base surgery.
Bumm K; Wurm J; Rachinger J; Dannenmann T; Bohr C; Fahlbusch R; Iro H; Nimsky C
Minim Invasive Neurosurg; 2005 Jun; 48(3):159-64. PubMed ID: 16015493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of 3-dimensional obliquity and anisometric characteristics of anterior cruciate ligament graft positions using surgical navigation.
Pearle AD; Shannon FJ; Granchi C; Wickiewicz TL; Warren RF
Am J Sports Med; 2008 Aug; 36(8):1534-41. PubMed ID: 18390491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Preliminary experience with electromagnetic navigation system in TKA.
Tigani D; Busacca M; Moio A; Rimondi E; Del Piccolo N; Sabbioni G
Knee; 2009 Jan; 16(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 18948010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy evaluation of surface-based registration methods in a computer navigation system for hip surgery performed through a posterolateral approach.
Sugano N; Sasama T; Sato Y; Nakajima Y; Nishii T; Yonenobu K; Tamura S; Ochi T
Comput Aided Surg; 2001; 6(4):195-203. PubMed ID: 11835614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fracture-table-mounted versus bone-mounted dynamic reference frame tracking accuracy using computer-assisted orthopaedic surgery--a comparative study.
Ilsar I; Weil YA; Joskowicz L; Mosheiff R; Liebergall M
Comput Aided Surg; 2007 Mar; 12(2):125-30. PubMed ID: 17487662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Development of a robotic navigation system for neurosurgery.
Tseng CS; Chung CW; Chen HH; Wang SS; Tseng HM
Stud Health Technol Inform; 1999; 62():358-9. PubMed ID: 10538386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Effects of medical robot-assisted surgical navigation system in distal locking of femoral intramedullary nails: an experimental study].
Wang JQ; Wang JF; Hu L; Su YG; Wang Y; Zhao CP; Zhou L; Wang TM; Wang MY
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2006 Mar; 86(9):614-8. PubMed ID: 16681907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Distraction osteogenesis of the femur using conventional monolateral external fixator.
Sangkaew C
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2008 Sep; 128(9):889-99. PubMed ID: 17874249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A rat model for evaluating physiological responses to femoral shaft fracture reduction using a surgical robot.
Oszwald M; ; Westphal R; O'Loughlin PF; Kendoff D; Hufner T; Wahl F; Krettek C; Gosling T
J Orthop Res; 2008 Dec; 26(12):1656-9. PubMed ID: 18634014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The accuracy of acquisition of an imageless computer-assisted system and its implication for knee arthroplasty.
Lustig S; Fleury C; Goy D; Neyret P; Donell ST
Knee; 2011 Jan; 18(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 20060724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Intraoperative precision of mechanical, electromagnetic, infrared and laser-guided navigation systems in computer-assisted surgery].
Marmulla R; Hilbert M; Niederdellmann H
Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir; 1998 May; 2 Suppl 1():S145-8. PubMed ID: 9658842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The influence of the da Vinci surgical robot on electromagnetic tracking in a clinical environment.
Aguilera Saiz L; Groen HC; Heerink WJ; Ruers TJM
J Robot Surg; 2024 Jan; 18(1):54. PubMed ID: 38280064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
