These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2146249)
1. Interpreting the Cruzan case for Arkansas. Hackler C; Wilson AO J Ark Med Soc; 1990 Sep; 87(4):152-4. PubMed ID: 2146249 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The Cruzan case: who has the right to decide? Johnson SH Health Prog; 1989 Nov; 70(9):22-5. PubMed ID: 10313361 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The constitutional dimensions of the right to refuse medically assisted nutrition and hydration: an analysis of Cruzan. Karbal W J Health Hosp Law; 1990 Aug; 23(8):241-8, 256. PubMed ID: 10113286 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Matter of life or death. Berliner H Health Serv J; 1990 Jun; 100(5204):851. PubMed ID: 10113222 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Cruzan v Missouri: will the real meaning please stand up? Barton HM Tex Med; 1990 Nov; 86(11):18-9. PubMed ID: 2126896 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Supreme Court to examine withdrawal of nutrition and hydration. Costa L Contemp Longterm Care; 1990 Jan; 13(1):61-2. PubMed ID: 10113080 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Between life and death lies dignity. Gasner R Mich Hosp; 1990 Jan; 26(1):6-11, 13-4. PubMed ID: 10113092 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Family decision making on trial. Who decides for incompetent patients? Lo B; Rouse F; Dornbrand L N Engl J Med; 1990 Apr; 322(17):1228-32. PubMed ID: 2109196 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The Supreme Court speaks on treatment refusal: the Cruzan case. Miller RD Hosp Law Newsl; 1990 Oct; 7(12):1-5. PubMed ID: 10113332 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Perspectives. Living will concept boosted by Cruzan ruling. Olson EG Faulkner Grays Med Health; 1990 Jul; 44(28):suppl 4 p.. PubMed ID: 10105409 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Nancy Cruzan in China. Annas GJ Hastings Cent Rep; 1990; 20(5):39-41. PubMed ID: 2228588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Beyond Cruzan: making life support decisions. Anderson KM; Byrne FD; Robinson RD Indiana Med; 1990 Nov; 83(11):838-41. PubMed ID: 2262678 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The Cruzan decision and medical practice. Thomasma DC Arch Intern Med; 1991 May; 151(5):853-4. PubMed ID: 2025130 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Withdrawal of nutrition and hydration from an incompetent patient: legal developments leading to Cruzan. Garvey MA J Health Hosp Law; 1990 Aug; 23(8):225-40, 255. PubMed ID: 10113285 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The role of state legislatures after Cruzan: what can--and should--state legislatures do? Rouse F Law Med Health Care; 1991; 19(1-2):83-90. PubMed ID: 1895773 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Right-to-die ruling begs the question: who will decide? Wagner L Mod Healthc; 1990 Oct; 20(43):34-9. PubMed ID: 10113384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Life and death after Cruzan: recent developments in right to die cases. Elliott SJ Healthspan; 1992; 9(7):12-6. PubMed ID: 10121439 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Special report on patient care. Supreme Court upholds state court decision in Cruzan. Kadzielski MA; Neumann PG Health Care Law Newsl; 1990 Sep; 5(9):12-4. PubMed ID: 10113308 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Comment: the Supreme Court faces the quest of withdrawal of hydration and nutrition: Cruzan v. Missouri Department of Health. Craig P J Health Hosp Law; 1989 Dec; 22(12):375-9. PubMed ID: 10296700 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]