These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
42. Visible light-hardened glass-ionomer-resin cement restorations for primary teeth: new developments. Croll TP; Killian CM Quintessence Int; 1992 Oct; 23(10):679-82. PubMed ID: 1289949 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Advantages of new restorative materials in dental care for children. Feigal RJ J Mich Dent Assoc; 1999 Feb; 81(2):32-6, 38. PubMed ID: 10686934 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. Materials used to restore class II lesions in primary molars: a survey of California pediatric dentists. Pair RL; Udin RD; Tanbonliong T Pediatr Dent; 2004; 26(6):501-7. PubMed ID: 15646912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. [Restorations with composite resin and hybrid materials clinical]. Săvenau CI; Dănilă I Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi; 2010; 114(1):233-8. PubMed ID: 20509308 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Three-and-a-half-year clinical evaluation of posterior composite resin in children. Memarpour M; Mesbahi M; Shafıei F J Dent Child (Chic); 2010; 77(2):92-8. PubMed ID: 20819404 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. The material science of minimally invasive esthetic restorations. Nový BB; Fuller CE Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2008; 29(6):338-46; quiz 347. PubMed ID: 18795638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Amalgam, composite resin and glass ionomer cement in Class II restorations in primary molars--a three year clinical evaluation. Ostlund J; Möller K; Koch G Swed Dent J; 1992; 16(3):81-6. PubMed ID: 1496459 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Placement of a preformed indirect resin composite shell crown: a case report. Updyke J; Sneed WD Pediatr Dent; 2001; 23(2):143-4. PubMed ID: 11340727 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Class II Vitremer restoration of primary molars. Croll TP; Helpin ML ASDC J Dent Child; 1995; 62(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 7775678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Two-year clinical performance in primary teeth of nano-filled versus conventional resin-modified glass-ionomer restorations. Abo-Hamar SE; El-Desouky SS; Abu Hamila NA Quintessence Int; 2015 May; 46(5):381-8. PubMed ID: 25642461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Three-year follow up assessment of Class II restorations in primary molars with a polyacid-modified composite resin and a hybrid composite. Attin T; Opatowski A; Meyer C; Zingg-Meyer B; Buchalla W; Mönting JS Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):148-52. PubMed ID: 11572292 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Preservation-based approaches to restore posterior teeth with amalgam, resin or a combination of materials. Baghdadi ZD Am J Dent; 2002 Feb; 15(1):54-65. PubMed ID: 12074231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Resin-modified glass-ionomer restorations and in vitro secondary caries formation in coronal enamel. Hicks MJ; Flaitz CM Quintessence Int; 2000 Sep; 31(8):570-8. PubMed ID: 11203979 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]