These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21463080)

  • 1. Dissociating the components of switch cost using two-to-two cue-task mapping.
    Hydock C; Sohn MH
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Jun; 37(3):903-13. PubMed ID: 21463080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cue-independent task-specific representations in task switching: evidence from backward inhibition.
    Altmann EM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Sep; 33(5):892-9. PubMed ID: 17723067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Task alternation cost without task alternation: measuring intentionality.
    Yehene E; Meiran N; Soroker N
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(13):1858-69. PubMed ID: 16168729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Short cue presentations encourage advance task preparation: a recipe to diminish the residual switch cost.
    Verbruggen F; Liefooghe B; Vandierendonck A; Demanet J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):342-56. PubMed ID: 17352616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Task switching versus cue switching: using transition cuing to disentangle sequential effects in task-switching performance.
    Schneider DW; Logan GD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):370-8. PubMed ID: 17352618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fractionating the cognitive control required to bring about a change in task: a dense-sensor event-related potential study.
    Astle DE; Jackson GM; Swainson R
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Feb; 20(2):255-67. PubMed ID: 18275333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cue-task associations in task switching.
    Gade M; Koch I
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Jun; 60(6):762-9. PubMed ID: 17514592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impaired task switching performance in children with dyslexia but not in children with autism.
    Poljac E; Simon S; Ringlever L; Kalcik D; Groen WB; Buitelaar JK; Bekkering H
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Feb; 63(2):401-16. PubMed ID: 19565430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Advance preparation in task switching: what work is being done?
    Altmann EM
    Psychol Sci; 2004 Sep; 15(9):616-22. PubMed ID: 15327633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cognitive control in cued task switching with transition cues: cue processing, task processing, and cue-task transition congruency.
    Van Loy B; Liefooghe B; Vandierendonck A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Oct; 63(10):1916-35. PubMed ID: 20574933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dissociating cue-related and task-related processes in task inhibition: evidence from using a 2:1 cue-to-task mapping.
    Gade M; Koch I
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2008 Mar; 62(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 18473629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Distinct neurophysiological mechanisms mediate mixing costs and switch costs.
    Wylie GR; Murray MM; Javitt DC; Foxe JJ
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Jan; 21(1):105-18. PubMed ID: 18476759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Task-set switching under cue-based versus memory-based switching conditions in younger and older adults.
    Kray J
    Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 1105(1):83-92. PubMed ID: 16387284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Components of task-set reconfiguration: differential effects of 'switch-to' and 'switch-away' cues.
    Nicholson R; Karayanidis F; Davies A; Michie PT
    Brain Res; 2006 Nov; 1121(1):160-76. PubMed ID: 17010947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. ERPs dissociate the effects of switching task sets and task cues.
    Nicholson R; Karayanidis F; Bumak E; Poboka D; Michie PT
    Brain Res; 2006 Jun; 1095(1):107-23. PubMed ID: 16714004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The influence of cue-task association and location on switch cost and alternating-switch cost.
    Arbuthnott KD; Woodward TS
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2002 Mar; 56(1):18-29. PubMed ID: 11901958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Heightened conflict in cue-target translation increases backward inhibition in set switching.
    Grange JA; Houghton G
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jul; 36(4):1003-9. PubMed ID: 20565215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Inner speech as a retrieval aid for task goals: the effects of cue type and articulatory suppression in the random task cuing paradigm.
    Miyake A; Emerson MJ; Padilla F; Ahn JC
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2004; 115(2-3):123-42. PubMed ID: 14962397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The time course of the asymmetrical "local" switch cost: evidence from event-related potentials.
    Martin CD; Barcelo F; Hernandez M; Costa A
    Biol Psychol; 2011 Mar; 86(3):210-8. PubMed ID: 21167903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Methodological and empirical issues when dissociating cue-related from task-related processes in the explicit task-cuing procedure.
    Forstmann BU; Brass M; Koch I
    Psychol Res; 2007 Jul; 71(4):393-400. PubMed ID: 16397813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.