These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
7. The recognition of everyday objects changes grasp scaling. Borchers S; Himmelbach M Vision Res; 2012 Aug; 67():8-13. PubMed ID: 22772030 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of broken affordance on visual extinction. Wulff M; Humphreys GW Front Hum Neurosci; 2015; 9():515. PubMed ID: 26441612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Selecting object pairs for action: Is the active object always first? Laverick R; Wulff M; Honisch JJ; Chua WL; Wing AM; Rotshtein P Exp Brain Res; 2015 Aug; 233(8):2269-81. PubMed ID: 25929555 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The potentiation of two components of the reach-to-grasp action during object categorisation in visual memory. Derbyshire N; Ellis R; Tucker M Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 May; 122(1):74-98. PubMed ID: 16376844 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Attending to the possibilities of action. Humphreys GW; Kumar S; Yoon EY; Wulff M; Roberts KL; Riddoch MJ Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2013 Oct; 368(1628):20130059. PubMed ID: 24018721 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Action-related objects influence the distribution of visuospatial attention. Roberts KL; Humphreys GW Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Apr; 64(4):669-88. PubMed ID: 21113857 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Implied actions between paired objects lead to affordance selection by inhibition. Xu S; Humphreys GW; Heinke D J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Aug; 41(4):1021-36. PubMed ID: 25961281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Internal model of gravity influences configural body processing. Barra J; Senot P; Auclair L Cognition; 2017 Jan; 158():208-214. PubMed ID: 27842273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Do silhouettes and photographs produce fundamentally different object-based correspondence effects? Proctor RW; Lien MC; Thompson L Cognition; 2017 Dec; 169():91-101. PubMed ID: 28865287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The influence of feature conjunction on object inversion and conversion effects. Bushmakin MA; James TW Perception; 2014; 43(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 24689130 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Selectivity for the shape, size, and orientation of objects for grasping in neurons of monkey parietal area AIP. Murata A; Gallese V; Luppino G; Kaseda M; Sakata H J Neurophysiol; 2000 May; 83(5):2580-601. PubMed ID: 10805659 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Location-coding account versus affordance-activation account in handle-to-hand correspondence effects: Evidence of Simon-like effects based on the coding of action direction. Pellicano A; Koch I; Binkofski F J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Sep; 43(9):1647-1666. PubMed ID: 28414500 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A computational shape-based model of anger and sadness justifies a configural representation of faces. Neth D; Martinez AM Vision Res; 2010 Aug; 50(17):1693-711. PubMed ID: 20510267 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Functional relations trump implied motion in recovery from extinction: evidence from the effects of animacy on extinction. Riddoch MJ; Riveros R; Humphreys GW Neurocase; 2011 Feb; 17(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 20672224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]