These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21463220)
1. Outcome of the cementless Taperloc stem: a comprehensive literature review including arthroplasty register data. Labek G; Frischhut S; Schlichtherle R; Williams A; Thaler M Acta Orthop; 2011 Apr; 82(2):143-8. PubMed ID: 21463220 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The outcome of the cementless tapered SL-Plus stem: an analysis of arthroplasty register data. Labek G; Kovac S; Levasic V; Janda W; Zagra L Int Orthop; 2012 Jun; 36(6):1149-54. PubMed ID: 22139197 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Revision rate of Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasty: comparison of published literature and arthroplasty register data. Schuh R; Neumann D; Rauf R; Hofstaetter J; Boehler N; Labek G Int Orthop; 2012 Jul; 36(7):1349-54. PubMed ID: 22350138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Survival Rate of Short-Stem Hip Prostheses: A Comparative Analysis of Clinical Studies and National Arthroplasty Registers. Hauer G; Vielgut I; Amerstorfer F; Maurer-Ertl W; Leithner A; Sadoghi P J Arthroplasty; 2018 Jun; 33(6):1800-1805. PubMed ID: 29428465 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pooled outcome of total hip arthroplasty with the CementLess Spotorno (CLS) system: a comparative analysis of clinical studies and worldwide arthroplasty register data. Sadoghi P; Janda W; Agreiter M; Rauf R; Leithner A; Labek G Int Orthop; 2013 Jun; 37(6):995-9. PubMed ID: 23525550 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validity of published outcome data concerning Anatomic Graduated Component total knee arthroplasty: a structured literature review including arthroplasty register data. Schuh R; Dorninger G; Agreiter M; Boehler N; Labek G Int Orthop; 2012 Jan; 36(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 21487670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Outcome and reproducibility of data concerning the Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a structured literature review including arthroplasty registry data. Labek G; Sekyra K; Pawelka W; Janda W; Stöckl B Acta Orthop; 2011 Apr; 82(2):131-5. PubMed ID: 21434760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cementless total hip arthroplasty with large diameter metal-on-metal heads: short-term survivorship of 8059 hips from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register. Mokka J; Mäkelä KT; Virolainen P; Remes V; Pulkkinen P; Eskelinen A Scand J Surg; 2013; 102(2):117-23. PubMed ID: 23820688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A modular cementless stem vs. cemented long-stem prostheses in revision surgery of the hip: a population-based study from the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register. Weiss RJ; Stark A; Kärrholm J Acta Orthop; 2011 Apr; 82(2):136-42. PubMed ID: 21434792 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of implant developers on published outcome and reproducibility of cohort-based clinical studies in arthroplasty. Labek G; Neumann D; Agreiter M; Schuh R; Böhler N J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Dec; 93 Suppl 3():55-61. PubMed ID: 22262425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative pooled survival and revision rate of Austin-Moore hip arthroplasty in published literature and arthroplasty register data. Sadoghi P; Thaler M; Janda W; Hübl M; Leithner A; Labek G J Arthroplasty; 2013 Sep; 28(8):1349-53. PubMed ID: 23535284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Outcomes of different bearings in total hip arthroplasty - implant survival, revision causes, and patient-reported outcome. Varnum C Dan Med J; 2017 Mar; 64(3):. PubMed ID: 28260601 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. What Is the Risk of Revision Surgery in Hydroxyapatite-coated Femoral Hip Stems? Findings From a Large National Registry. Inacio MC; Lorimer M; Davidson DC; De Steiger RN; Lewis PL; Graves SE Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Dec; 476(12):2353-2366. PubMed ID: 30303878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quality of outcome data in total hip arthroplasty: comparison of registry data and worldwide non-registry studies from 5 decades. Pabinger C; Bridgens A; Berghold A; Wurzer P; Boehler N; Labek G Hip Int; 2015; 25(5):394-401. PubMed ID: 25837781 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The type of surgical approach influences the risk of revision in total hip arthroplasty: a study from the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register of 90,662 total hipreplacements with 3 different cemented prostheses. Lindgren V; Garellick G; Kärrholm J; Wretenberg P Acta Orthop; 2012 Dec; 83(6):559-65. PubMed ID: 23116440 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fate of cementless acetabular components retained during revision total hip arthroplasty. Beaulé PE; Le Duff MJ; Dorey FJ; Amstutz HC J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2003 Dec; 85(12):2288-93. PubMed ID: 14668496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis in patients fifty-five years of age or older. An analysis of the Finnish arthroplasty registry. Mäkelä KT; Eskelinen A; Pulkkinen P; Paavolainen P; Remes V J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Oct; 90(10):2160-70. PubMed ID: 18829914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mid-term results of 119 Taperloc Microplasty™ femoral stems after a mean 61 months (50-82) of follow-up. Saragaglia D; Orfeuvre B Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2020 Dec; 106(8):1501-1506. PubMed ID: 33268300 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Outcomes After Metal-on-metal Hip Revision Surgery Depend on the Reason for Failure: A Propensity Score-matched Study. Matharu GS; Judge A; Murray DW; Pandit HG Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Feb; 476(2):245-258. PubMed ID: 29529653 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Five-year results of the ASR XL Acetabular System and the ASR Hip Resurfacing System: an analysis from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. de Steiger RN; Hang JR; Miller LN; Graves SE; Davidson DC J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Dec; 93(24):2287-93. PubMed ID: 22258775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]