333 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21463566)
1. Subjective and psychophysiological indexes of listening effort in a competing-talker task.
Mackersie CL; Cones H
J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 Feb; 22(2):113-22. PubMed ID: 21463566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of hearing loss on heart rate variability and skin conductance measured during sentence recognition in noise.
Mackersie CL; MacPhee IX; Heldt EW
Ear Hear; 2015 Jan; 36(1):145-54. PubMed ID: 25170782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Listening Effort by Native and Nonnative Listeners Due to Noise, Reverberation, and Talker Foreign Accent During English Speech Perception.
Peng ZE; Wang LM
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Apr; 62(4):1068-1081. PubMed ID: 30986135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of Psychophysiological and Dual-Task Measures of Listening Effort.
Seeman S; Sims R
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2015 Dec; 58(6):1781-92. PubMed ID: 26363285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Novel sounds as a psychophysiological measure of listening effort in older listeners with and without hearing loss.
Bertoli S; Bodmer D
Clin Neurophysiol; 2014 May; 125(5):1030-41. PubMed ID: 24216383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: the influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response.
Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):498-510. PubMed ID: 21233711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of Additional Low-Pass-Filtered Speech on Listening Effort for Noise-Band-Vocoded Speech in Quiet and in Noise.
Pals C; Sarampalis A; van Dijk M; Başkent D
Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):3-17. PubMed ID: 29757801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Autonomic Nervous System Reactivity During Speech Repetition Tasks: Heart Rate Variability and Skin Conductance.
Mackersie CL; Calderon-Moultrie N
Ear Hear; 2016; 37 Suppl 1():118S-25S. PubMed ID: 27355761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Autonomic Nervous System Responses to Hearing-Related Demand and Evaluative Threat.
Mackersie CL; Kearney L
Am J Audiol; 2017 Oct; 26(3S):373-377. PubMed ID: 29049621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of changing the secondary task in dual-task paradigms for measuring listening effort.
Picou EM; Ricketts TA
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(6):611-22. PubMed ID: 24992491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Effects of Hearing Aid Directional Microphone and Noise Reduction Processing on Listening Effort in Older Adults with Hearing Loss.
Desjardins JL
J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Jan; 27(1):29-41. PubMed ID: 26809324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Investigating Speech Recognition and listening effort with different device configurations in adult cochlear implant users.
Sladen DP; Nie Y; Berg K
Cochlear Implants Int; 2018 May; 19(3):119-130. PubMed ID: 29457564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Age-related changes in listening effort for various types of masker noises.
Desjardins JL; Doherty KA
Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):261-72. PubMed ID: 23095723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Self-monitoring of listening abilities in normal-hearing children, normal-hearing adults, and children with cochlear implants.
Rothpletz AM; Wightman FL; Kistler DJ
J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Mar; 23(3):206-21. PubMed ID: 22436118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effects of hearing aid use on listening effort and mental fatigue associated with sustained speech processing demands.
Hornsby BW
Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):523-34. PubMed ID: 23426091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Effects of Noise and Reverberation on Listening Effort in Adults With Normal Hearing.
Picou EM; Gordon J; Ricketts TA
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 26372266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pupil response as an indication of effortful listening: the influence of sentence intelligibility.
Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):480-90. PubMed ID: 20588118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Negative Effect of Acoustic Panels on Listening Effort in a Classroom Environment.
Amlani AM; Russo TA
J Am Acad Audiol; 2016; 27(10):805-815. PubMed ID: 27885976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of presentation level on normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners' acceptable speech and noise levels.
Recker KL; Edwards BW
J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Jan; 24(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 23231813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
