186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21464653)
21. [Roaming through methodology. IV. Causality].
van Gijn J; Rooijmans HG
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1998 Aug; 142(31):1765-7. PubMed ID: 9856141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Interpreting epidemiological evidence: how meta-analysis and causal inference methods are related.
Weed DL
Int J Epidemiol; 2000 Jun; 29(3):387-90. PubMed ID: 10869307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The importance of covariate selection in controlling for selection bias in observational studies.
Steiner PM; Cook TD; Shadish WR; Clark MH
Psychol Methods; 2010 Sep; 15(3):250-67. PubMed ID: 20822251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Evidence from nonrandomized studies: a case study on the estimation of causal effects.
Schmoor C; Caputo A; Schumacher M
Am J Epidemiol; 2008 May; 167(9):1120-9. PubMed ID: 18334500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Discussion of "Identifiability and estimation of causal effects in randomized trials with noncompliance and completely nonignorable missing data".
Small DS; Cheng J
Biometrics; 2009 Sep; 65(3):682-6; discussion 689-91. PubMed ID: 18759846
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Towards an epidemiology of rheumatoid arthritis outcome with respect to treatment: randomized controlled trials overestimate treatment response and effectiveness.
Wolfe F; Michaud K
Rheumatology (Oxford); 2005 Dec; 44 Suppl 4():iv18-iv22. PubMed ID: 16306476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The design versus the analysis of observational studies for causal effects: parallels with the design of randomized trials.
Rubin DB
Stat Med; 2007 Jan; 26(1):20-36. PubMed ID: 17072897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Current guidelines on good reporting of analytical observational studies in epidemiology.
Boden LA; Parkin TD
Equine Vet J; 2008 Jan; 40(1):84-6. PubMed ID: 18083665
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Principal stratification with predictors of compliance for randomized trials with 2 active treatments.
Roy J; Hogan JW; Marcus BH
Biostatistics; 2008 Apr; 9(2):277-89. PubMed ID: 17681993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Model misspecification sensitivity analysis in estimating causal effects of interventions with non-compliance.
Jo B
Stat Med; 2002 Nov; 21(21):3161-81. PubMed ID: 12375297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Does analysis using "last observation carried forward" introduce bias in dementia research?
Molnar FJ; Hutton B; Fergusson D
CMAJ; 2008 Oct; 179(8):751-3. PubMed ID: 18838445
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. What random assignment does and does not do.
Krause MS; Howard KI
J Clin Psychol; 2003 Jul; 59(7):751-66. PubMed ID: 12808582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Adjusting for selection effects in epidemiologic studies: why sensitivity analysis is the only "solution".
Geneletti S; Mason A; Best N
Epidemiology; 2011 Jan; 22(1):36-9. PubMed ID: 21150353
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Cluster size variability and imbalance in cluster randomized controlled trials.
Carter B
Stat Med; 2010 Dec; 29(29):2984-93. PubMed ID: 20963749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Transportability and causal generalization.
Schwartz S; Gatto NM; Campbell UB
Epidemiology; 2011 Sep; 22(5):745-6. PubMed ID: 21811113
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Effect of formal statistical significance on the credibility of observational associations.
Ioannidis JP
Am J Epidemiol; 2008 Aug; 168(4):374-83; discussion 384-90. PubMed ID: 18611956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Prediction and causal inference.
Gagliardi L
Acta Paediatr; 2009 Dec; 98(12):1890-2. PubMed ID: 20050836
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. A definition of causal effect for epidemiological research.
Hernán MA
J Epidemiol Community Health; 2004 Apr; 58(4):265-71. PubMed ID: 15026432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Nonrandomized quality improvement intervention trials might overstate the strength of causal inference of their findings.
Li LC; Moja L; Romero A; Sayre EC; Grimshaw JM
J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Sep; 62(9):959-66. PubMed ID: 19211223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The fallacy of enrolling only high-risk subjects in cancer prevention trials: is there a "free lunch"?
Baker SG; Kramer BS; Corle D
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2004 Oct; 4():24. PubMed ID: 15461821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
