89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21464828)
1. Quality assuring the 2011 Census population estimates.
Wroth-Smith J; Abbott O; Compton G; Benton P
Popul Trends; 2011; (143):10-8. PubMed ID: 21464828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. 2011 Census Field design: getting the numbers right.
Townsend N
Popul Trends; 2011; (143):19-28. PubMed ID: 21464829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Implications of 2001 Census for local authority district mid-year population estimates.
Smith J; Chappell R; Whitworth A; Duncan C
Popul Trends; 2003; (113):20-31. PubMed ID: 14582210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Rebasing the annual mid-year population estimates for England and Wales.
Duncan C; Chappell R; Smith J; Clark L; Ambrose F
Popul Trends; 2002; (109):9-14. PubMed ID: 12643045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Population bases and the 2011 Census.
Smallwood S
Popul Trends; 2011; (143):29-46. PubMed ID: 21464830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Key issues in the quality assurance of the One Number Census.
Diamond I; Abbott O; Jackson N
Popul Trends; 2003; (113):11-9. PubMed ID: 14582209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. 2011 census overview.
Watson G
Popul Trends; 2011; (143):6-9. PubMed ID: 21464827
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The 2011 Census: a proposed design for England and Wales.
Benton P; Massingham R; Brown H; White I
Popul Trends; 2004; (115):16-23. PubMed ID: 15192890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. 1991 population estimates for areas smaller than districts.
Simpson S; Cossey R; Diamond I
Popul Trends; 1997; (90):31-9. PubMed ID: 9449158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The 2007 Census Test: evaluation of key objectives.
Compton G
Popul Trends; 2008; (132):26-33. PubMed ID: 18700521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Population estimates; backseries methodology for 1992-2000.
Littlefield M; Fulton R
Popul Trends; 2005; (122):18-26. PubMed ID: 16411621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [From natural to controlled fertility: Mexico, 1950-1980].
Juarez F; Quilodran J; Zavala De Cosio ME
Estud Demogr Urbanos Col Mex; 1989; 4(1):5-51, 215. PubMed ID: 12342498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The development of a 'Postcode Best Fit' methodology for producing population estimates for different geographies.
Bates A
Popul Trends; 2008; (133):28-34. PubMed ID: 18847066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Some indirect estimates of fertility from 1980 census data in Kuwait.
Kohli KL; Al Omaim M
Popul Bull U N Econ Comm West Asia; 1985 Jun; (26):39-62. PubMed ID: 12267383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The re-based 1991 population estimates by marital status.
Morris M
Popul Trends; 1997; (89):37-48. PubMed ID: 9368946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The business of demographics.
Russell C
Popul Bull; 1984 Jun; 39(3):1-40. PubMed ID: 12313263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. How have administrative sources been used to adjust population estimates and set plausibility ranges?
Tinsley R
Popul Trends; 2011; (145):229-50. PubMed ID: 21987021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Geography for the 2001 Census in England and Wales.
Martin D
Popul Trends; 2002; (108):7-15. PubMed ID: 12138615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Some problems relating to the collection of demographic data in the population censuses taken in Latin America during the 1980s].
Arretx C; Chackiel J
Notas Poblacion; 1986 Dec; 14(42):51-76. PubMed ID: 12314804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The feasibility of making short-term migration estimates.
Smith J; Sharfman A
Popul Trends; 2007; (127):21-9. PubMed ID: 17508654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
