These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21464910)

  • 1. Patient-specific unicompartmental knee resurfacing arthroplasty: use of a novel interference lock to reduce tibial insert micromotion and backside wear.
    Steklov N; Chao N; Srivastav S
    Open Biomed Eng J; 2010 Aug; 4():156-61. PubMed ID: 21464910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Backside wear of modular ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene tibial inserts.
    Conditt MA; Ismaily SK; Alexander JW; Noble PC
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2004 May; 86(5):1031-7. PubMed ID: 15118049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Current Total Knee Designs: Does Baseplate Roughness or Locking Mechanism Design Affect Polyethylene Backside Wear?
    Sisko ZW; Teeter MG; Lanting BA; Howard JL; McCalden RW; Naudie DD; MacDonald SJ; Vasarhelyi EM
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Dec; 475(12):2970-2980. PubMed ID: 28905208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Tibial interface wear in retrieved total knee components and correlations with modular insert motion.
    Rao AR; Engh GA; Collier MB; Lounici S
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2002 Oct; 84(10):1849-55. PubMed ID: 12377918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prediction of backside micromotion in total knee replacements by finite element simulation.
    O'Brien S; Luo Y; Wu C; Petrak M; Bohm E; Brandt JM
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2012 Mar; 226(3):235-45. PubMed ID: 22558838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Tibial insert undersurface as a contributing source of polyethylene wear debris.
    Wasielewski RC; Parks N; Williams I; Surprenant H; Collier JP; Engh G
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1997 Dec; (345):53-9. PubMed ID: 9418621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The causes of insert backside wear in total knee arthroplasty.
    Wasielewski RC
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2002 Nov; (404):232-46. PubMed ID: 12439265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In vivo deterioration of tibial baseplate locking mechanisms in contemporary modular total knee components.
    Engh GA; Lounici S; Rao AR; Collier MB
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2001 Nov; 83(11):1660-5. PubMed ID: 11701788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Coventry Award. Modular tibial insert micromotion. A concern with contemporary knee implants.
    Parks NL; Engh GA; Topoleski LD; Emperado J
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1998 Nov; (356):10-5. PubMed ID: 9917661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Peripheral snap-fit locking mechanisms and smooth surface finish of tibial trays reduce backside wear in fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty.
    Łapaj Ł; Mróz A; Kokoszka P; Markuszewski J; Wendland J; Helak-Łapaj C; Kruczyński J
    Acta Orthop; 2017 Feb; 88(1):62-69. PubMed ID: 27781667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of backside wear from the analysis of 55 retrieved tibial inserts.
    Li S; Scuderi G; Furman BD; Bhattacharyya S; Schmieg JJ; Insall JN
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2002 Nov; (404):75-82. PubMed ID: 12439241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of interference assembly of a tibial insert on the tibiofemoral contact mechanics in total knee replacement.
    Chen Z; Zhang J; Gao Y; Chen S; Zhang X; Jin Z
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2019 Sep; 233(9):948-953. PubMed ID: 31234760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Contribution of micro-motion to backside wear in a fixed bearing total knee arthroplasty.
    Levine RA; Lewicki KA; Currier JH; Mayor MB; Van Citters DW
    J Orthop Res; 2016 Nov; 34(11):1933-1940. PubMed ID: 26970078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Backside wear in modern total knee designs.
    Jayabalan P; Furman BD; Cottrell JM; Wright TM
    HSS J; 2007 Feb; 3(1):30-4. PubMed ID: 18751767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Factors affecting the severity of backside wear of modular tibial inserts.
    Conditt MA; Stein JA; Noble PC
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2004 Feb; 86(2):305-11. PubMed ID: 14960675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Backside wear of polyethylene tibial inserts: mechanism and magnitude of material loss.
    Conditt MA; Thompson MT; Usrey MM; Ismaily SK; Noble PC
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2005 Feb; 87(2):326-31. PubMed ID: 15687155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Material and surface factors influencing backside fretting wear in total knee replacement tibial components.
    Billi F; Sangiorgio SN; Aust S; Ebramzadeh E
    J Biomech; 2010 May; 43(7):1310-5. PubMed ID: 20172525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The influence of tibial tray design on the wear of fixed-bearing total knee replacements.
    Galvin A; Jennings LM; McEwen HM; Fisher J
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2008 Nov; 222(8):1289-93. PubMed ID: 19143421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Micromotion at the tibial plateau in primary and revision total knee arthroplasty: fixed versus rotating platform designs.
    Small SR; Rogge RD; Malinzak RA; Reyes EM; Cook PL; Farley KA; Ritter MA
    Bone Joint Res; 2016 Apr; 5(4):122-9. PubMed ID: 27095658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of patient, surgical, and implant design factors on predicted tray-bone interface micromotions in cementless total knee arthroplasty.
    Yang H; Bayoglu R; Clary CW; Rullkoetter PJ
    J Orthop Res; 2023 Jan; 41(1):115-129. PubMed ID: 35437819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.