These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21464969)
1. Pupillometric evidence for the decoupling of attention from perceptual input during offline thought. Smallwood J; Brown KS; Tipper C; Giesbrecht B; Franklin MS; Mrazek MD; Carlson JM; Schooler JW PLoS One; 2011 Mar; 6(3):e18298. PubMed ID: 21464969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Captivated by thought: "Sticky" thinking leaves traces of perceptual decoupling in task-evoked pupil size. Huijser S; Verkaik M; van Vugt MK; Taatgen NA PLoS One; 2020; 15(12):e0243532. PubMed ID: 33296415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Insulation for daydreams: a role for tonic norepinephrine in the facilitation of internally guided thought. Smallwood J; Brown KS; Baird B; Mrazek MD; Franklin MS; Schooler JW PLoS One; 2012; 7(4):e33706. PubMed ID: 22493672 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. When attention wanders: Pupillometric signatures of fluctuations in external attention. Konishi M; Brown K; Battaglini L; Smallwood J Cognition; 2017 Nov; 168():16-26. PubMed ID: 28645038 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Window to the wandering mind: pupillometry of spontaneous thought while reading. Franklin MS; Broadway JM; Mrazek MD; Smallwood J; Schooler JW Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(12):2289-94. PubMed ID: 24313285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cooperation between the default mode network and the frontal-parietal network in the production of an internal train of thought. Smallwood J; Brown K; Baird B; Schooler JW Brain Res; 2012 Jan; 1428():60-70. PubMed ID: 21466793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The importance of arousal for variation in working memory capacity and attention control: A latent variable pupillometry study. Unsworth N; Robison MK J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Dec; 43(12):1962-1987. PubMed ID: 28504528 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The wandering self: Tracking distracting self-generated thought in a cognitively demanding context. Huijser S; van Vugt MK; Taatgen NA Conscious Cogn; 2018 Feb; 58():170-185. PubMed ID: 29275845 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pupillary Dynamics Link Spontaneous and Task-Evoked Activations Recorded Directly from Human Insula. Kucyi A; Parvizi J J Neurosci; 2020 Aug; 40(32):6207-6218. PubMed ID: 32631937 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Orienting attention to visual or verbal/auditory imagery differentially impairs the processing of visual stimuli. Villena-González M; López V; Rodríguez E Neuroimage; 2016 May; 132():71-78. PubMed ID: 26876471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Decoupling of the pupillary light response during internal attention: The modulating effect of luminance intensity. Korda Ž; Walcher S; Körner C; Benedek M Acta Psychol (Amst); 2024 Feb; 242():104123. PubMed ID: 38181698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Probing the neural signature of mind wandering with simultaneous fMRI-EEG and pupillometry. Groot JM; Boayue NM; Csifcsák G; Boekel W; Huster R; Forstmann BU; Mittner M Neuroimage; 2021 Jan; 224():117412. PubMed ID: 33011417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mental effort during mindless reading? Pupil fluctuations indicate internal processing during levels of inattention. Schad DJ; Nuthmann A; Rösler F; Engbert R J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2024 Oct; 50(10):1637-1649. PubMed ID: 39264671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Harnessing the wandering mind: the role of perceptual load. Forster S; Lavie N Cognition; 2009 Jun; 111(3):345-55. PubMed ID: 19327760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Integration and segregation across large-scale intrinsic brain networks as a marker of sustained attention and task-unrelated thought. Zuberer A; Kucyi A; Yamashita A; Wu CM; Walter M; Valera EM; Esterman M Neuroimage; 2021 Apr; 229():117610. PubMed ID: 33418073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Searching for the elements of thought: reply to Franklin, Mrazek, Broadway, and Schooler (2013). Smallwood J Psychol Bull; 2013 May; 139(3):542-547. PubMed ID: 23607432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Individual differences in baseline oculometrics: Examining variation in baseline pupil diameter, spontaneous eye blink rate, and fixation stability. Unsworth N; Robison MK; Miller AL Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2019 Aug; 19(4):1074-1093. PubMed ID: 30888645 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Task-Evoked Pupil Response in Divided Auditory Attention Tasks. Baldock J; Kapadia S; van Steenbrugge W J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Apr; 30(4):264-272. PubMed ID: 30461386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]