268 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21465329)
1. Can tantalum cones provide fixation in complex revision knee arthroplasty?
Lachiewicz PF; Bolognesi MP; Henderson RA; Soileau ES; Vail TP
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2012 Jan; 470(1):199-204. PubMed ID: 21465329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Use of porous tantalum metaphyseal cones for severe tibial bone loss during revision total knee replacement.
Meneghini RM; Lewallen DG; Hanssen AD
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Jan; 90(1):78-84. PubMed ID: 18171960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Tantalum Cones Provide Durable Mid-term Fixation in Revision TKA.
De Martino I; De Santis V; Sculco PK; D'Apolito R; Assini JB; Gasparini G
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Oct; 473(10):3176-82. PubMed ID: 25968895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Early results of the use of tantalum femoral cones for revision total knee arthroplasty.
Howard JL; Kudera J; Lewallen DG; Hanssen AD
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Mar; 93(5):478-84. PubMed ID: 21368080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Midterm Results of Porous Tantalum Femoral Cones in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Potter GD; Abdel MP; Lewallen DG; Hanssen AD
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2016 Aug; 98(15):1286-91. PubMed ID: 27489319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Porous tantalum metaphyseal cones for severe tibial bone loss in revision knee arthroplasty: a five to nine-year follow-up.
Kamath AF; Lewallen DG; Hanssen AD
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2015 Feb; 97(3):216-23. PubMed ID: 25653322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Tantalum Cones for Severe Bone Defects in Revision Knee Arthroplasty: A Minimum 10-Year Follow-Up.
De Martino I; Mancino F; Di Matteo V; Singlitico A; Maccauro G; Gasparini G
J Arthroplasty; 2023 May; 38(5):886-892. PubMed ID: 36481282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Use of porous tantalum metaphyseal cones for severe tibial bone loss during revision total knee replacement. Surgical technique.
Meneghini RM; Lewallen DG; Hanssen AD
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2009 Mar; 91 Suppl 2 Pt 1():131-8. PubMed ID: 19255205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Total knee arthroplasty revision with trabecular tantalum cones: Preliminary retrospective study of 51 patients from two centres with a minimal 2-year follow-up.
Girerd D; Parratte S; Lunebourg A; Boureau F; Ollivier M; Pasquier G; Putman S; Migaud H; Argenson JN
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2016 Jun; 102(4):429-33. PubMed ID: 27052939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Tantalum cones for major osteolysis in revision knee replacement.
Rao BM; Kamal TT; Vafaye J; Moss M
Bone Joint J; 2013 Aug; 95-B(8):1069-74. PubMed ID: 23908422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical Survivorship of Aseptic Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Hinged Knees and Tantalum Cones at Minimum 10-Year Follow-Up.
Abdelaziz H; Jaramillo R; Gehrke T; Ohlmeier M; Citak M
J Arthroplasty; 2019 Dec; 34(12):3018-3022. PubMed ID: 31351856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Porous Tantalum Metaphyseal Cones for Severe Femoral and Tibial Bone Defects in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty are Reliable for Fixation at Mean 5-Year Follow-Up.
Kayani B; Howard LC; Neufeld ME; Greidanus NV; Masri BA; Garbuz DS
J Arthroplasty; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38508344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Excellent mid- to long-term survival of tantalum metal cones in a case series of revision knee arthroplasty with severe bony defects.
Eder-Halbedl M; Fink A; Pietsch M; Djahani O; Hofmann S
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2023 Dec; 31(12):5496-5506. PubMed ID: 37819600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Tantalum cones and bone defects in revision total knee arthroplasty.
Boureau F; Putman S; Arnould A; Dereudre G; Migaud H; Pasquier G
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2015 Apr; 101(2):251-5. PubMed ID: 25755068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Tantalum cones in revision total knee arthroplasty. A promising short-term result with 29 cones in 21 patients.
Villanueva-Martínez M; De la Torre-Escudero B; Rojo-Manaute JM; Ríos-Luna A; Chana-Rodriguez F
J Arthroplasty; 2013 Jun; 28(6):988-93. PubMed ID: 23414934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Do Porous Tantalum Metaphyseal Cones Improve Outcomes in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty?
Bohl DD; Brown NM; McDowell MA; Levine BR; Sporer SM; Paprosky WG; Della Valle CJ
J Arthroplasty; 2018 Jan; 33(1):171-177. PubMed ID: 28844630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Addressing large tibial osseous defects in primary total knee arthroplasty using porous tantalum cones.
You JS; Wright AR; Hasegawa I; Kobayashi B; Kawahara M; Wang J; Nakasone CK
Knee; 2019 Jan; 26(1):228-239. PubMed ID: 30554910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. High survival rate at mid-term follow up of porous tantalum cones for bone defects in revision total knee replacement: A 3-11 years follow up report.
Rossi SMP; Perticarini L; Ghiara M; Jannelli E; Cortesi L; Benazzo F
Knee; 2022 Mar; 35():175-182. PubMed ID: 35349974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Metaphyseal Fixation Using Highly Porous Cones in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Minimum Two Year Follow Up Study.
Denehy KM; Abhari S; Krebs VE; Higuera-Rueda CA; Samuel LT; Sultan AA; Mont MA; Malkani AL
J Arthroplasty; 2019 Oct; 34(10):2439-2443. PubMed ID: 31000405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Excellent two-year survivorship of 3D-printed metaphyseal cones in revision total knee arthroplasty.
Tetreault MW; Perry KI; Pagnano MW; Hanssen AD; Abdel MP
Bone Joint J; 2020 Jun; 102-B(6_Supple_A):107-115. PubMed ID: 32475272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
