These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21465413)

  • 21. Action co-representation: the joint SNARC effect.
    Atmaca S; Sebanz N; Prinz W; Knoblich G
    Soc Neurosci; 2008; 3(3-4):410-20. PubMed ID: 18633833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The joint flanker effect: sharing tasks with real and imagined co-actors.
    Atmaca S; Sebanz N; Knoblich G
    Exp Brain Res; 2011 Jun; 211(3-4):371-85. PubMed ID: 21573746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The predictability of a partner's actions modulates the sense of joint agency.
    Bolt NK; Loehr JD
    Cognition; 2017 Apr; 161():60-65. PubMed ID: 28110236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Barriers to success: physical separation optimizes event-file retrieval in shared workspaces.
    Klempova B; Liepelt R
    Psychol Res; 2018 Nov; 82(6):1158-1176. PubMed ID: 28689319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Whose turn is it anyway? The moderating role of response-execution certainty on the joint Simon effect.
    Karlinsky A; Lam MY; Chua R; Hodges NJ
    Psychol Res; 2019 Jul; 83(5):833-841. PubMed ID: 28795222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. When Pinocchio acts like a human, a wooden hand becomes embodied. Action co-representation for non-biological agents.
    Müller BCN; Brass M; Kühn S; Tsai CC; Nieuwboer W; Dijksterhuis A; van Baaren RB
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Apr; 49(5):1373-1377. PubMed ID: 21241722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. How vertical elevation affects self-other integration as measured by the joint Simon effect.
    Van der Weiden A; Pril D; Dittrich K; Richter J; Lammers J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2021 Oct; 220():103404. PubMed ID: 34534898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Evidence for we-representations during joint action planning.
    Kourtis D; Woźniak M; Sebanz N; Knoblich G
    Neuropsychologia; 2019 Aug; 131():73-83. PubMed ID: 31153967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Not just in sync: Relations between partners' actions influence the sense of joint agency during joint action.
    Zhou Z; Christensen J; Cummings JA; Loehr JD
    Conscious Cogn; 2023 May; 111():103521. PubMed ID: 37084534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Enhanced encoding of the co-actor's target stimuli during a shared non-motor task.
    Elekes F; Bródy G; Halász E; Király I
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016 Dec; 69(12):2376-2389. PubMed ID: 26624868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Differentiating explanations of attitude-consistent behavior: the role of perspectives and mode of perspective taking.
    Dimdins G; Montgomery H; Austers I
    Scand J Psychol; 2005 Apr; 46(2):97-106. PubMed ID: 15762938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. How social is social inhibition of return?
    Atkinson MA; Millett AC; Doneva SP; Simpson A; Cole GG
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Nov; 80(8):1892-1903. PubMed ID: 30014316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Contextual determinants of the social-transfer-of-learning effect.
    Milanese N; Iani C; Sebanz N; Rubichi S
    Exp Brain Res; 2011 Jun; 211(3-4):415-22. PubMed ID: 21512798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The Influence of Social and Nonsocial Variables on the Simon Effect.
    Mussi DR; Marino BF; Riggio L
    Exp Psychol; 2015; 62(4):215-31. PubMed ID: 26421448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Does the mask govern the mind?: effects of arbitrary gender representation on quantitative task performance in avatar-represented virtual groups.
    Lee JE; Nass CI; Bailenson JN
    Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw; 2014 Apr; 17(4):248-54. PubMed ID: 24479529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Index of difficulty and side of space are accommodated during the selection and planning of a joint action.
    Ray M; de Grosbois J; Welsh TN
    Hum Mov Sci; 2017 Aug; 54():197-209. PubMed ID: 28527422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Empathic perspective taking promotes interpersonal coordination through music.
    Novembre G; Mitsopoulos Z; Keller PE
    Sci Rep; 2019 Aug; 9(1):12255. PubMed ID: 31439866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Planning my actions to accommodate yours: joint action development during early childhood.
    Meyer M; van der Wel RP; Hunnius S
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2016 May; 371(1693):. PubMed ID: 27069048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Visual perspective taking for avatars in a Simon task.
    Böffel C; Müsseler J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Jan; 81(1):158-172. PubMed ID: 30187398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. No evidence of task co-representation in a joint Stroop task.
    Saunders DR; Melcher D; van Zoest W
    Psychol Res; 2019 Jul; 83(5):852-862. PubMed ID: 28852867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.