These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21465541)
1. Morphology enabled dipole inversion (MEDI) from a single-angle acquisition: comparison with COSMOS in human brain imaging. Liu T; Liu J; de Rochefort L; Spincemaille P; Khalidov I; Ledoux JR; Wang Y Magn Reson Med; 2011 Sep; 66(3):777-83. PubMed ID: 21465541 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantitative susceptibility mapping using deep neural network: QSMnet. Yoon J; Gong E; Chatnuntawech I; Bilgic B; Lee J; Jung W; Ko J; Jung H; Setsompop K; Zaharchuk G; Kim EY; Pauly J; Lee J Neuroimage; 2018 Oct; 179():199-206. PubMed ID: 29894829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of the morphology enabled dipole inversion (MEDI) algorithm for quantitative susceptibility mapping in MRI. Liu T; Xu W; Spincemaille P; Avestimehr AS; Wang Y IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2012 Mar; 31(3):816-24. PubMed ID: 22231170 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical feasibility of brain quantitative susceptibility mapping. Zhang S; Liu Z; Nguyen TD; Yao Y; Gillen KM; Spincemaille P; Kovanlikaya I; Gupta A; Wang Y Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Jul; 60():44-51. PubMed ID: 30954651 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Coherence enhancement in quantitative susceptibility mapping by means of anisotropic weighting in morphology enabled dipole inversion. Kee Y; Cho J; Deh K; Liu Z; Spincemaille P; Wang Y Magn Reson Med; 2018 Feb; 79(2):1172-1180. PubMed ID: 28556244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Morphology-adaptive total variation for the reconstruction of quantitative susceptibility map from the magnetic resonance imaging phase. Guo L; Mei Y; Guan J; Tan X; Xu Y; Chen W; Feng Q; Feng Y PLoS One; 2018; 13(5):e0196922. PubMed ID: 29738526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quantitative susceptibility mapping for investigating subtle susceptibility variations in the human brain. Schweser F; Sommer K; Deistung A; Reichenbach JR Neuroimage; 2012 Sep; 62(3):2083-100. PubMed ID: 22659482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Whole-brain susceptibility mapping at high field: a comparison of multiple- and single-orientation methods. Wharton S; Bowtell R Neuroimage; 2010 Nov; 53(2):515-25. PubMed ID: 20615474 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Calculation of susceptibility through multiple orientation sampling (COSMOS): a method for conditioning the inverse problem from measured magnetic field map to susceptibility source image in MRI. Liu T; Spincemaille P; de Rochefort L; Kressler B; Wang Y Magn Reson Med; 2009 Jan; 61(1):196-204. PubMed ID: 19097205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. MEDI+0: Morphology enabled dipole inversion with automatic uniform cerebrospinal fluid zero reference for quantitative susceptibility mapping. Liu Z; Spincemaille P; Yao Y; Zhang Y; Wang Y Magn Reson Med; 2018 May; 79(5):2795-2803. PubMed ID: 29023982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Rapid two-step dipole inversion for susceptibility mapping with sparsity priors. Kames C; Wiggermann V; Rauscher A Neuroimage; 2018 Feb; 167():276-283. PubMed ID: 29138089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Chaos and COSMOS-Considerations on QSM methods with multiple and single orientations and effects from local anisotropy. Gkotsoulias DG; Jäger C; Müller R; Gräßle T; Olofsson KM; Møller T; Unwin S; Crockford C; Wittig RM; Bilgic B; Möller HE Magn Reson Imaging; 2024 Jul; 110():104-111. PubMed ID: 38631534 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Rapid reconstruction of quantitative susceptibility mapping via improved ℓ Cai C; Chen X; Liu W; Cai S; Zeng D; Ding X Comput Biol Med; 2016 Dec; 79():59-67. PubMed ID: 27744181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Morphology enabled dipole inversion for quantitative susceptibility mapping using structural consistency between the magnitude image and the susceptibility map. Liu J; Liu T; de Rochefort L; Ledoux J; Khalidov I; Chen W; Tsiouris AJ; Wisnieff C; Spincemaille P; Prince MR; Wang Y Neuroimage; 2012 Feb; 59(3):2560-8. PubMed ID: 21925276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Single-step calculation of susceptibility through multiple orientation sampling. Chen L; Cai S; van Zijl PCM; Li X NMR Biomed; 2021 Jul; 34(7):e4517. PubMed ID: 33822416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Computed inverse resonance imaging for magnetic susceptibility map reconstruction. Chen Z; Calhoun V J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2012; 36(2):265-74. PubMed ID: 22446372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Background field removal using a region adaptive kernel for quantitative susceptibility mapping of human brain. Fang J; Bao L; Li X; van Zijl PCM; Chen Z J Magn Reson; 2017 Aug; 281():130-140. PubMed ID: 28595120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping Using the Multiple Dipole-inversion Combination with k-space Segmentation Method. Sato R; Shirai T; Taniguchi Y; Murase T; Bito Y; Ochi H Magn Reson Med Sci; 2017 Oct; 16(4):340-350. PubMed ID: 28367904 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]