These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

416 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21465605)

  • 1. GI-RADS reporting system for ultrasound evaluation of adnexal masses in clinical practice: a prospective multicenter study.
    Amor F; Alcázar JL; Vaccaro H; León M; Iturra A
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Oct; 38(4):450-5. PubMed ID: 21465605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Diagnostic performance of the Gynecology Imaging Reporting and Data System for malignant adnexal masses.
    Zhang T; Li F; Liu J; Zhang S
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2017 Jun; 137(3):325-331. PubMed ID: 28295272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Gynecologic imaging reporting and data system: a new proposal for classifying adnexal masses on the basis of sonographic findings.
    Amor F; Vaccaro H; Alcázar JL; León M; Craig JM; Martinez J
    J Ultrasound Med; 2009 Mar; 28(3):285-91. PubMed ID: 19244063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Performance of three-dimensional power Doppler angiography as third-step assessment in differential diagnosis of adnexal masses.
    Utrilla-Layna J; Alcázar JL; Aubá M; Laparte C; Olartecoechea B; Errasti T; Juez L; Mínguez JÁ; Guerriero S; Jurado M
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 May; 45(5):613-7. PubMed ID: 25270368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Diagnostic performance of IOTA simple rules for adnexal masses classification: a comparison between two centers with different ovarian cancer prevalence.
    Ruiz de Gauna B; Rodriguez D; Olartecoechea B; Aubá M; Jurado M; Gómez Roig MD; Alcázar JL
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Aug; 191():10-4. PubMed ID: 26066289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Adnexal masses difficult to classify as benign or malignant using subjective assessment of gray-scale and Doppler ultrasound findings: logistic regression models do not help.
    Valentin L; Ameye L; Savelli L; Fruscio R; Leone FP; Czekierdowski A; Lissoni AA; Fischerova D; Guerriero S; Van Holsbeke C; Van Huffel S; Timmerman D
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Oct; 38(4):456-65. PubMed ID: 21520475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prospective external validation of the 'ovarian crescent sign' as a single ultrasound parameter to distinguish between benign and malignant adnexal pathology.
    Van Holsbeke C; Van Belle V; Leone FP; Guerriero S; Paladini D; Melis GB; Greggi S; Fischerova D; De Jonge E; Neven P; Bourne T; Valentin L; Van Huffel S; Timmerman D
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Jul; 36(1):81-7. PubMed ID: 20217895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Gynecology Imaging Reporting and Data System (GI-RADS): diagnostic performance and inter-reviewer agreement.
    Basha MAA; Refaat R; Ibrahim SA; Madkour NM; Awad AM; Mohamed EM; El Sammak AA; Zaitoun MMA; Dawoud HA; Khamis MEM; Mohamed HAE; El-Maghraby AM; Abdalla AAEM; Assy MM; Nada MG; Obaya AA; Abdelbary EH
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Nov; 29(11):5981-5990. PubMed ID: 30993433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Predicting the risk of malignancy in adnexal masses based on the Simple Rules from the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis group.
    Timmerman D; Van Calster B; Testa A; Savelli L; Fischerova D; Froyman W; Wynants L; Van Holsbeke C; Epstein E; Franchi D; Kaijser J; Czekierdowski A; Guerriero S; Fruscio R; Leone FPG; Rossi A; Landolfo C; Vergote I; Bourne T; Valentin L
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Apr; 214(4):424-437. PubMed ID: 26800772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. External validation of IOTA simple descriptors and simple rules for classifying adnexal masses.
    Alcázar JL; Pascual MA; Graupera B; Aubá M; Errasti T; Olartecoechea B; Ruiz-Zambrana A; Hereter L; Ajossa S; Guerriero S
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Sep; 48(3):397-402. PubMed ID: 26748432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of O-RADS, GI-RADS, and IOTA simple rules regarding malignancy rate, validity, and reliability for diagnosis of adnexal masses.
    Basha MAA; Metwally MI; Gamil SA; Khater HM; Aly SA; El Sammak AA; Zaitoun MMA; Khattab EM; Azmy TM; Alayouty NA; Mohey N; Almassry HN; Yousef HY; Ibrahim SA; Mohamed EA; Mohamed AEM; Afifi AHM; Harb OA; Algazzar HY
    Eur Radiol; 2021 Feb; 31(2):674-684. PubMed ID: 32809166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Diagnostic value of the gynecology imaging reporting and data system (GI-RADS) with the ovarian malignancy marker CA-125 in preoperative adnexal tumor assessment.
    Migda M; Bartosz M; Migda MS; Kierszk M; Katarzyna G; Maleńczyk M
    J Ovarian Res; 2018 Nov; 11(1):92. PubMed ID: 30390688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Differentiation of benign and malignant adnexal masses: relative value of gray-scale, color Doppler, and spectral Doppler sonography.
    Stein SM; Laifer-Narin S; Johnson MB; Roman LD; Muderspach LI; Tyszka JM; Ralls PW
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Feb; 164(2):381-6. PubMed ID: 7839975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Simple ultrasound-based rules for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer.
    Timmerman D; Testa AC; Bourne T; Ameye L; Jurkovic D; Van Holsbeke C; Paladini D; Van Calster B; Vergote I; Van Huffel S; Valentin L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jun; 31(6):681-90. PubMed ID: 18504770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Discrimination between benign and malignant adnexal masses by specialist ultrasound examination versus serum CA-125.
    Van Calster B; Timmerman D; Bourne T; Testa AC; Van Holsbeke C; Domali E; Jurkovic D; Neven P; Van Huffel S; Valentin L
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Nov; 99(22):1706-14. PubMed ID: 18000221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prospective external validation of IOTA three-step strategy for characterizing and classifying adnexal masses and retrospective assessment of alternative two-step strategy using simple-rules risk.
    Hidalgo JJ; Ros F; Aubá M; Errasti T; Olartecoechea B; Ruiz-Zambrana Á; Alcázar JL
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 May; 53(5):693-700. PubMed ID: 30353585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Diagnostic accuracy of gynecology imaging reporting and data system in evaluation of adnexal lesions.
    Behnamfar F; Adibi A; Khadra H; Moradi M
    J Res Med Sci; 2019; 24():57. PubMed ID: 31523243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Adding a single CA 125 measurement to ultrasound imaging performed by an experienced examiner does not improve preoperative discrimination between benign and malignant adnexal masses.
    Valentin L; Jurkovic D; Van Calster B; Testa A; Van Holsbeke C; Bourne T; Vergote I; Van Huffel S; Timmerman D
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Sep; 34(3):345-54. PubMed ID: 19585547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Contribution of power Doppler blood flow mapping to gray-scale ultrasound for predicting malignancy of adnexal masses in symptomatic and asymptomatic women.
    Alcázar JL; Guerriero S; Laparte C; Ajossa S; Jurado M
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 Mar; 155(1):99-105. PubMed ID: 21211896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Diagnostic Performance of Ultrasonography-Based Risk Models in Differentiating Between Benign and Malignant Ovarian Tumors in a US Cohort.
    Yoeli-Bik R; Longman RE; Wroblewski K; Weigert M; Abramowicz JS; Lengyel E
    JAMA Netw Open; 2023 Jul; 6(7):e2323289. PubMed ID: 37440228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.