402 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21465605)
1. GI-RADS reporting system for ultrasound evaluation of adnexal masses in clinical practice: a prospective multicenter study.
Amor F; Alcázar JL; Vaccaro H; León M; Iturra A
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Oct; 38(4):450-5. PubMed ID: 21465605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnostic performance of the Gynecology Imaging Reporting and Data System for malignant adnexal masses.
Zhang T; Li F; Liu J; Zhang S
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2017 Jun; 137(3):325-331. PubMed ID: 28295272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Gynecologic imaging reporting and data system: a new proposal for classifying adnexal masses on the basis of sonographic findings.
Amor F; Vaccaro H; Alcázar JL; León M; Craig JM; Martinez J
J Ultrasound Med; 2009 Mar; 28(3):285-91. PubMed ID: 19244063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Performance of three-dimensional power Doppler angiography as third-step assessment in differential diagnosis of adnexal masses.
Utrilla-Layna J; Alcázar JL; Aubá M; Laparte C; Olartecoechea B; Errasti T; Juez L; Mínguez JÁ; Guerriero S; Jurado M
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 May; 45(5):613-7. PubMed ID: 25270368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diagnostic performance of IOTA simple rules for adnexal masses classification: a comparison between two centers with different ovarian cancer prevalence.
Ruiz de Gauna B; Rodriguez D; Olartecoechea B; Aubá M; Jurado M; Gómez Roig MD; Alcázar JL
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Aug; 191():10-4. PubMed ID: 26066289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Adnexal masses difficult to classify as benign or malignant using subjective assessment of gray-scale and Doppler ultrasound findings: logistic regression models do not help.
Valentin L; Ameye L; Savelli L; Fruscio R; Leone FP; Czekierdowski A; Lissoni AA; Fischerova D; Guerriero S; Van Holsbeke C; Van Huffel S; Timmerman D
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Oct; 38(4):456-65. PubMed ID: 21520475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prospective external validation of the 'ovarian crescent sign' as a single ultrasound parameter to distinguish between benign and malignant adnexal pathology.
Van Holsbeke C; Van Belle V; Leone FP; Guerriero S; Paladini D; Melis GB; Greggi S; Fischerova D; De Jonge E; Neven P; Bourne T; Valentin L; Van Huffel S; Timmerman D
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Jul; 36(1):81-7. PubMed ID: 20217895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Gynecology Imaging Reporting and Data System (GI-RADS): diagnostic performance and inter-reviewer agreement.
Basha MAA; Refaat R; Ibrahim SA; Madkour NM; Awad AM; Mohamed EM; El Sammak AA; Zaitoun MMA; Dawoud HA; Khamis MEM; Mohamed HAE; El-Maghraby AM; Abdalla AAEM; Assy MM; Nada MG; Obaya AA; Abdelbary EH
Eur Radiol; 2019 Nov; 29(11):5981-5990. PubMed ID: 30993433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Predicting the risk of malignancy in adnexal masses based on the Simple Rules from the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis group.
Timmerman D; Van Calster B; Testa A; Savelli L; Fischerova D; Froyman W; Wynants L; Van Holsbeke C; Epstein E; Franchi D; Kaijser J; Czekierdowski A; Guerriero S; Fruscio R; Leone FPG; Rossi A; Landolfo C; Vergote I; Bourne T; Valentin L
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Apr; 214(4):424-437. PubMed ID: 26800772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. External validation of IOTA simple descriptors and simple rules for classifying adnexal masses.
Alcázar JL; Pascual MA; Graupera B; Aubá M; Errasti T; Olartecoechea B; Ruiz-Zambrana A; Hereter L; Ajossa S; Guerriero S
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Sep; 48(3):397-402. PubMed ID: 26748432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of O-RADS, GI-RADS, and IOTA simple rules regarding malignancy rate, validity, and reliability for diagnosis of adnexal masses.
Basha MAA; Metwally MI; Gamil SA; Khater HM; Aly SA; El Sammak AA; Zaitoun MMA; Khattab EM; Azmy TM; Alayouty NA; Mohey N; Almassry HN; Yousef HY; Ibrahim SA; Mohamed EA; Mohamed AEM; Afifi AHM; Harb OA; Algazzar HY
Eur Radiol; 2021 Feb; 31(2):674-684. PubMed ID: 32809166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnostic value of the gynecology imaging reporting and data system (GI-RADS) with the ovarian malignancy marker CA-125 in preoperative adnexal tumor assessment.
Migda M; Bartosz M; Migda MS; Kierszk M; Katarzyna G; Maleńczyk M
J Ovarian Res; 2018 Nov; 11(1):92. PubMed ID: 30390688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Differentiation of benign and malignant adnexal masses: relative value of gray-scale, color Doppler, and spectral Doppler sonography.
Stein SM; Laifer-Narin S; Johnson MB; Roman LD; Muderspach LI; Tyszka JM; Ralls PW
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Feb; 164(2):381-6. PubMed ID: 7839975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Simple ultrasound-based rules for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer.
Timmerman D; Testa AC; Bourne T; Ameye L; Jurkovic D; Van Holsbeke C; Paladini D; Van Calster B; Vergote I; Van Huffel S; Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jun; 31(6):681-90. PubMed ID: 18504770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Discrimination between benign and malignant adnexal masses by specialist ultrasound examination versus serum CA-125.
Van Calster B; Timmerman D; Bourne T; Testa AC; Van Holsbeke C; Domali E; Jurkovic D; Neven P; Van Huffel S; Valentin L
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Nov; 99(22):1706-14. PubMed ID: 18000221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prospective external validation of IOTA three-step strategy for characterizing and classifying adnexal masses and retrospective assessment of alternative two-step strategy using simple-rules risk.
Hidalgo JJ; Ros F; Aubá M; Errasti T; Olartecoechea B; Ruiz-Zambrana Á; Alcázar JL
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 May; 53(5):693-700. PubMed ID: 30353585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnostic accuracy of gynecology imaging reporting and data system in evaluation of adnexal lesions.
Behnamfar F; Adibi A; Khadra H; Moradi M
J Res Med Sci; 2019; 24():57. PubMed ID: 31523243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Adding a single CA 125 measurement to ultrasound imaging performed by an experienced examiner does not improve preoperative discrimination between benign and malignant adnexal masses.
Valentin L; Jurkovic D; Van Calster B; Testa A; Van Holsbeke C; Bourne T; Vergote I; Van Huffel S; Timmerman D
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Sep; 34(3):345-54. PubMed ID: 19585547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Contribution of power Doppler blood flow mapping to gray-scale ultrasound for predicting malignancy of adnexal masses in symptomatic and asymptomatic women.
Alcázar JL; Guerriero S; Laparte C; Ajossa S; Jurado M
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 Mar; 155(1):99-105. PubMed ID: 21211896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diagnostic Performance of Ultrasonography-Based Risk Models in Differentiating Between Benign and Malignant Ovarian Tumors in a US Cohort.
Yoeli-Bik R; Longman RE; Wroblewski K; Weigert M; Abramowicz JS; Lengyel E
JAMA Netw Open; 2023 Jul; 6(7):e2323289. PubMed ID: 37440228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
