129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21466527)
1. Re: Consequences in women of participating in a study of the natural history of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3.
Frawley N
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2011 Apr; 51(2):186-7; author reply 187. PubMed ID: 21466527
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The 1987 National Women's Hospital 'Unfortunate experiment'.
Overton GH
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2011 Apr; 51(2):184; author reply 185-6. PubMed ID: 21466525
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The 1987 National Women's Hospital (NWH) 'Unfortunate Experiment'. Accusations of unethical experiments and undertreatment, resulting in excess deaths from cervical cancer. Facts and fables.
Overton GH
N Z Med J; 2010 Jul; 123(1319):101-5. PubMed ID: 20717185
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The missing manuscript.
Frizelle FA
N Z Med J; 2010 Jul; 123(1319):11-3. PubMed ID: 20717173
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Review of cytologic slides from the national women's hospital, New Zealand, cohort of women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3 diagnosed in 1955-1976.
McCredie MR; Medley G; Sharples KJ; Jones RW; Baranyai J; Paul C; Skegg DC
Acta Cytol; 2006; 50(6):632-6. PubMed ID: 17152274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A response to criticisms of The History of the 'Unfortunate Experiment' at National Women's Hospital.
Bryder L
N Z Med J; 2010 Jul; 123(1319):14-21. PubMed ID: 20717174
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A retrospective study: response to Dr McCredie. Re: consequences in women of participating in a study of the natural history of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3.
Bryder L
N Z Med J; 2010 Aug; 123(1321):104. PubMed ID: 20927167
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Consequences in women of participating in a study of the natural history of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3.
McCredie MR; Paul C; Sharples KJ; Baranyai J; Medley G; Skegg DC; Jones RW
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2010 Aug; 50(4):363-70. PubMed ID: 20716265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Predicting regression of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 in women under 25 years.
Sykes PH; Simcock BJ; Innes CR; Harker D; Williman JA; Whitehead M; van der Griend RA; Lawton BA; Hibma M; Fitzgerald P; Dudley NM; Petrich S; Eva L; Bergzoll C; Kathuria J; McPherson G; Tristram A; Faherty J; Hardie D; Robertson A; Robertson V; Pather S; Wrede CD; Gastrell F; Fentiman G; John M; White E; Parker C; Sadler L
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Feb; 226(2):222.e1-222.e13. PubMed ID: 34534506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Natural history of cervical neoplasia and risk of invasive cancer in women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3: a retrospective cohort study.
McCredie MR; Sharples KJ; Paul C; Baranyai J; Medley G; Jones RW; Skegg DC
Lancet Oncol; 2008 May; 9(5):425-34. PubMed ID: 18407790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A response to Professor Bryder's comments on 'Consequences in women of participating in a study of the natural history of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3'.
McCredie M
N Z Med J; 2010 Aug; 123(1320):115-7. PubMed ID: 20720613
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Inadequate cervical smear: what do we do?
Phadnis SV; Doshi JS; Ogunnaike OO; Padwick ML; Sanusi FA
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2005 May; 84(5):486-8. PubMed ID: 15842215
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The natural history of cervical and vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia.
Jones RW
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Mar; 202(3):e12-3. PubMed ID: 20004886
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The differences in the cytological histories of women with high- and low-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Bertelsen B; Hartveit F
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 1996; 17(3):183-7. PubMed ID: 8780915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A response to Ron Jones' letter of 30 April 2010.
Overton H
N Z Med J; 2010 Jul; 123(1319):113-5. PubMed ID: 20717188
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Incidence of cervical cytological abnormalities with aging in the women's health initiative: a randomized controlled trial.
Yasmeen S; Romano PS; Pettinger M; Johnson SR; Hubbell FA; Lane DS; Hendrix SL
Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Aug; 108(2):410-9. PubMed ID: 16880313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Will exercising informed consent stop "unfortunate experiments"?
Young D
Birth; 2005 Mar; 32(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 15725198
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. A response to Ms Sandercock and Dr Burls regarding the methods used in the analysis for our first paper 'Natural history of cervical neoplasia and risk of invasive cancer in women diagnosed with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3'.
McCredie M
N Z Med J; 2010 Aug; 123(1321):105-7. PubMed ID: 20927168
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Carcinoma in situ of the cervix and its malignant potential. A lesson from New Zealand.
Chang AR
Cytopathology; 1990; 1(6):321-8. PubMed ID: 2101679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Characteristics of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in women infected with the human immunodeficiency virus.
Fruchter RG; Maiman M; Sillman FH; Camilien L; Webber CA; Kim DS
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Aug; 171(2):531-7. PubMed ID: 8059836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
