These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21466539)

  • 41. Validity of a questionnaire survey: response patterns in different subgroups and the effect of social desirability.
    Sjöström O; Holst D
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2002 Jun; 60(3):136-40. PubMed ID: 12166905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The conceptual link between social desirability and cultural normativity.
    Bou Malham P; Saucier G
    Int J Psychol; 2016 Dec; 51(6):474-480. PubMed ID: 26914819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Three experimental approaches to measure the social context dependence of prejudice communication and discriminatory behavior.
    Beyer H; Liebe U
    Soc Sci Res; 2015 Jan; 49():343-55. PubMed ID: 25432623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Thurstonian Scaling of Compositional Questionnaire Data.
    Brown A
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2016; 51(2-3):345-56. PubMed ID: 27054408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Disentangling prototypicality and social desirability: the case of the KNOWI task.
    Turan B
    J Pers Assess; 2011; 93(5):454-61. PubMed ID: 21859285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Motivated perception of probabilistic information.
    Lench HC; Smallman R; Darbor KE; Bench SW
    Cognition; 2014 Nov; 133(2):429-42. PubMed ID: 25151252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Three-way component analysis: principles and illustrative application.
    Kiers HA; Van Mechelen I
    Psychol Methods; 2001 Mar; 6(1):84-110. PubMed ID: 11285814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. "Everything Is Perfect, and We Have No Problems": Detecting and Limiting Social Desirability Bias in Qualitative Research.
    Bergen N; Labonté R
    Qual Health Res; 2020 Apr; 30(5):783-792. PubMed ID: 31830860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The latent class multitrait-multimethod model.
    Oberski DL; Hagenaars JA; Saris WE
    Psychol Methods; 2015 Dec; 20(4):422-43. PubMed ID: 26651987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Controlling social desirability bias: An experimental investigation of the extended crosswise model.
    Meisters J; Hoffmann A; Musch J
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(12):e0243384. PubMed ID: 33284820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Social desirability bias in qualitative health research.
    Bispo Júnior JP
    Rev Saude Publica; 2022; 56():101. PubMed ID: 36515303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Note on the social-desirability response set in singer's daydreaming questionnaire.
    Oakland JA
    Psychol Rep; 1968 Dec; 23(3):689-90. PubMed ID: 5717444
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Hoping for more: the influence of outcome desirability on information seeking and predictions about relative quantities.
    Scherer AM; Windschitl PD; O'Rourke J; Smith AR
    Cognition; 2012 Oct; 125(1):113-7. PubMed ID: 22832177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. [Anonymize or personalize? : Does social desirability influence the response behavior of chronic pain patients?].
    Langenmaier AM; Metje E; Klasen B; Brinkschmidt T; Karst M; Amelung V
    Schmerz; 2018 Dec; 32(6):456-463. PubMed ID: 30167874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Detecting Social Desirability Bias Using Factor Mixture Models.
    Leite WL; Cooper LA
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2010 Mar; 45(2):271-93. PubMed ID: 26760286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Social desirability bias: A confounding factor to consider in survey by self-administered questionnaire.
    Mondal H; Mondal S
    Indian J Pharmacol; 2018; 50(3):143-144. PubMed ID: 30166752
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Normativity and Desirability in Observational Assessments of Family Interaction.
    Deal JE
    Fam Process; 2019 Sep; 58(3):749-760. PubMed ID: 29888784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Novel Insights Into Item Keying/Valence Effect Using Latent Difference (LD) Modeling Analysis.
    Kam CCS
    J Pers Assess; 2018; 100(4):389-397. PubMed ID: 28980826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. A straightforward approach for coping with unreliability of person means when parsing within-person and between-person effects in longitudinal studies.
    Gottfredson NC
    Addict Behav; 2019 Jul; 94():156-161. PubMed ID: 30287075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN RESPONSE STABILITY AND ITEM ENDORSEMENT, SOCIAL DESIRABILITY, AND AMBIGUITY IN THE MMPI AND THE CPI.
    Payne FD
    Multivariate Behav Res; 1974 Apr; 9(2):127-48. PubMed ID: 26805047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.