BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21467123)

  • 1. Effects of extraction treatment on maxillary and mandibular sagittal development in growing patients.
    Kalwitzki M; Godt A; Göz G
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Oct; 33(5):544-50. PubMed ID: 21467123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Vertical changes in class II division 1 malocclusion after premolar extractions.
    Al-Nimri KS
    Angle Orthod; 2006 Jan; 76(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 16448269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Growth and treatment changes distal to the mandibular first molar: a lateral cephalometric study.
    Sable DL; Woods MG
    Angle Orthod; 2004 Jun; 74(3):367-74. PubMed ID: 15264649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Long-term effects of Class III treatment with rapid maxillary expansion and facemask therapy followed by fixed appliances.
    Westwood PV; McNamara JA; Baccetti T; Franchi L; Sarver DM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Mar; 123(3):306-20. PubMed ID: 12637903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of changes in the vertical facial dimension with different anchorage systems in extraction and non-extraction subjects treated by Begg fixed appliances: a retrospective study.
    Alkumru P; Erdem D; Altug-Atac AT
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Oct; 29(5):508-16. PubMed ID: 17974541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of activator and high-pull headgear combination therapy: skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue profile changes.
    Marşan G
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 17488997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Treatment effects produced by Fränkel appliance in patients with class II, division 1 malocclusion.
    Rodrigues de Almeida M; Castanha Henriques JF; Rodrigues de Almeida R; Ursi W
    Angle Orthod; 2002 Oct; 72(5):418-25. PubMed ID: 12401050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of orthodontic treatment on mandibular rotation and displacement in Angle Class II division 1 malocclusions.
    Phan XL; Schneider BJ; Sadowsky C; BeGole EA
    Angle Orthod; 2004 Apr; 74(2):174-83. PubMed ID: 15132443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sagittal maxillary growth in children with unilateral cleft of the lip, alveolus and palate at the age of 10 years: an intercentre comparison.
    Zemann W; Kärcher H; Drevenšek M; Koželj V
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2011 Oct; 39(7):469-74. PubMed ID: 21112793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Stability of skeletal Class II correction with 2 surgical techniques: the sagittal split ramus osteotomy and the total mandibular subapical alveolar osteotomy.
    Pangrazio-Kulbersh V; Berger JL; Kaczynski R; Shunock M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Aug; 120(2):134-43. PubMed ID: 11500654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dental arch widths and mandibular-maxillary base widths in Class II malocclusions between early mixed and permanent dentitions.
    Lux CJ; Conradt C; Burden D; Komposch G
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Dec; 73(6):674-85. PubMed ID: 14719732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of differential growth and orthodontic treatment outcome by regional cephalometric superpositions.
    Efstratiadis SS; Cohen G; Ghafari J
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Jun; 69(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 10371427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The influence of functional orthodontics and mandibular sagittal split advancement osteotomy on dental and skeletal variables--a comparative cephalometric study.
    Lohrmann B; Schwestka-Polly R; Nägerl H; Ihlow D; Kubein-Meesenburg D
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Dec; 28(6):553-60. PubMed ID: 17142259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Alignment stability in Class II malocclusion treated with 2- and 4-premolar extraction protocols.
    Janson G; Busato MC; Henriques JF; de Freitas MR; de Freitas LM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Aug; 130(2):189-95. PubMed ID: 16905063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Orthognathic surgery in the young cleft patient: preliminary study on subsequent facial growth.
    Wolford LM; Cassano DS; Cottrell DA; El Deeb M; Karras SC; Goncalves JR
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Dec; 66(12):2524-36. PubMed ID: 19022133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of cervical headgear with an expanded inner bow in the permanent dentition.
    Varlik SK; Iscan HN
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Aug; 30(4):425-30. PubMed ID: 18678761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An evaluation of maxillary and mandibular rotational responses with the Clark twin block appliance.
    Lau EY; Sampson WJ; Townsend GC; Hughes T
    Aust Orthod J; 2009 May; 25(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 19634464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Craniofacial changes in Icelandic children between 6 and 16 years of age - a longitudinal study.
    Thordarson A; Johannsdottir B; Magnusson TE
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Apr; 28(2):152-65. PubMed ID: 16230326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mandibular growth in subjects with infraoccluded deciduous molars: a superimposition study.
    Leonardi M; Armi P; Baccetti T; Franchi L; Caltabiano M
    Angle Orthod; 2005 Nov; 75(6):927-34. PubMed ID: 16448233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Third molar angulation during and after treatment of adolescent orthodontic patients.
    Artun J; Thalib L; Little RM
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Dec; 27(6):590-6. PubMed ID: 16009666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.