These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21467733)

  • 1. [Comparison of chest and abdominal x-ray radiation dose and its image quality-a multi-center study].
    Uto T; Ishiyama A; Kimura H; Katuragi Y; Masunari T; Shibutani T; Ishiki K; Nakanishi K; Anai T; Sumida S; Morimatu T; Miyano H
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2011; 67(2):152-61. PubMed ID: 21467733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Digital radiography in paediatrics: radiation dose considerations and magnitude of possible dose reduction.
    Hufton AP; Doyle SM; Carty HM
    Br J Radiol; 1998 Feb; 71(842):186-99. PubMed ID: 9579183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography.
    Bacher K; Smeets P; Bonnarens K; De Hauwere A; Verstraete K; Thierens H
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Oct; 181(4):923-9. PubMed ID: 14500203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Optimization of chest radiographic imaging parameters: a comparison of image quality and entrance skin dose for digital chest radiography systems.
    Sun Z; Lin C; Tyan Y; Ng KH
    Clin Imaging; 2012; 36(4):279-86. PubMed ID: 22726965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A framework for optimising the radiographic technique in digital X-ray imaging.
    Samei E; Dobbins JT; Lo JY; Tornai MP
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):220-9. PubMed ID: 15933112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Image quality and exposure dose in digital projection radiography].
    Busch HP; Busch S; Decker C; Schilz C
    Rofo; 2003 Jan; 175(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 12525978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluating radiographic parameters for mobile chest computed radiography: phantoms, image quality and effective dose.
    Rill LN; Brateman L; Arreola M
    Med Phys; 2003 Oct; 30(10):2727-35. PubMed ID: 14596311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Survey of posteroanterior chest radiography in The Netherlands: patient dose and image quality.
    van Soldt RT; Zweers D; van den Berg L; Geleijns J; Jansen JT; Zoetelief J
    Br J Radiol; 2003 Jun; 76(906):398-405. PubMed ID: 12814926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reducing CT radiation exposure with organ effective modulation: A retrospective clinical study.
    Akai H; Kiryu S; Shibata E; Maeda E; Sato J; Tomizawa N; Nojima M; Ohtomo K
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Sep; 85(9):1569-73. PubMed ID: 27501890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Neonatal chest radiography: Influence of standard clinical protocols and radiographic equipment on pathology visibility and radiation dose using a neonatal chest phantom.
    Al-Murshedi S; Peter Hogg ; England A
    Radiography (Lond); 2020 Nov; 26(4):282-287. PubMed ID: 32169312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. AMBER and conventional chest radiography: comparison of radiation dose and image quality.
    Geleijns J; Broerse JJ; Julius HW; Vrooman HA; Zoetelief J; Zweers D; Kool LJ
    Radiology; 1992 Dec; 185(3):719-23. PubMed ID: 1438752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Patient dose and image quality in five standard x-ray examinations.
    Havukainen R; Pirinen M
    Med Phys; 1993; 20(3):813-7. PubMed ID: 8350841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Low-dose digital computed radiography in pediatric chest imaging.
    Kogutt MS; Jones JP; Perkins DD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1988 Oct; 151(4):775-9. PubMed ID: 3262278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Optimisation of image plate radiography with respect to tube voltage.
    Tingberg A; Sjöström D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):286-93. PubMed ID: 15933123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Image quality assessment with dose reduction using high kVp and additional filtration for abdominal digital radiography.
    Jang JS; Yang HJ; Koo HJ; Kim SH; Park CR; Yoon SH; Shin SY; Do KH
    Phys Med; 2018 Jun; 50():46-51. PubMed ID: 29891093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An investigation into the radiation dose associated with different imaging systems for chest radiology.
    Marshall NW; Faulkner K; Busch HP; Marsh DM; Pfenning H
    Br J Radiol; 1994 Apr; 67(796):353-9. PubMed ID: 8173876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Computed radiography in pediatrics.
    Aoki K
    J Digit Imaging; 1995 Feb; 8(1 Suppl 1):92-5. PubMed ID: 7734550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Patient radiation exposure and image quality evaluation with the use of iDose4 iterative reconstruction algorithm in chest-abdomen-pelvis CT examinations.
    Ploussi A; Alexopoulou E; Economopoulos N; Argentos SI; Tsitsia V; Arapakis I; Kordolaimi S; Seimenis I; Efstathopoulos EP
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2014 Mar; 158(4):399-405. PubMed ID: 24107575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dose-image quality study in digital chest radiography using Monte Carlo simulation.
    Correa SC; Souza EM; Silva AX; Lopes RT; Yoriyaz H
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2008 Sep; 66(9):1213-7. PubMed ID: 18308576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Multidetector computed tomography chest examinations with low-kilovoltage protocols in adults: effect on image quality and radiation dose.
    Kim MJ; Park CH; Choi SJ; Hwang KH; Kim HS
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009; 33(3):416-21. PubMed ID: 19478637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.