BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21468551)

  • 21. Analysis of genomic aberrations associated with the clinicopathological parameters of rectal cancer by array‑based comparative genomic hybridization.
    Liang JW; Shi ZZ; Zhang TT; Hao JJ; Wang Z; Wang XM; Yang H; Wang MR; Zhou ZX; Zhang Y
    Oncol Rep; 2013 May; 29(5):1827-34. PubMed ID: 23440507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Genomic copy number of a carcinogenic single nucleotide polymorphism at 8q24 in non-risk allele colorectal cancer associated with insulin growth factor 2 receptor expression.
    Takahashi Y; Mimori K; Yamamoto K; Watanabe M; Tanaka J; Kudo SE; Sugihara K; Hase K; Mochizuki H; Kusunoki M; Yamada K; Shimada Y; Moriya Y; Mori M
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2012 Apr; 27 Suppl 3():95-9. PubMed ID: 22486879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. High resolution analysis of DNA copy number variation using comparative genomic hybridization to microarrays.
    Pinkel D; Segraves R; Sudar D; Clark S; Poole I; Kowbel D; Collins C; Kuo WL; Chen C; Zhai Y; Dairkee SH; Ljung BM; Gray JW; Albertson DG
    Nat Genet; 1998 Oct; 20(2):207-11. PubMed ID: 9771718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Chromosomal gains and losses in primary colorectal carcinomas detected by CGH and their associations with tumour DNA ploidy, genotypes and phenotypes.
    De Angelis PM; Clausen OP; Schjølberg A; Stokke T
    Br J Cancer; 1999 May; 80(3-4):526-35. PubMed ID: 10408863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Genomic instability and DNA ploidy are linked to DNA copy number aberrations of 8p23 and 22q11.23 in gastric cancers.
    Kawauchi S; Furuay T; Uchiyama T; Adachi A; Okada T; Nakao M; Oga A; Uchida K; Sasaki K
    Int J Mol Med; 2010 Sep; 26(3):333-9. PubMed ID: 20664948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Array comparative genomic hybridization analysis of colorectal cancer cell lines and primary carcinomas.
    Douglas EJ; Fiegler H; Rowan A; Halford S; Bicknell DC; Bodmer W; Tomlinson IP; Carter NP
    Cancer Res; 2004 Jul; 64(14):4817-25. PubMed ID: 15256451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Prognostic relevance of DNA copy number changes in colorectal cancer.
    Poulogiannis G; Ichimura K; Hamoudi RA; Luo F; Leung SY; Yuen ST; Harrison DJ; Wyllie AH; Arends MJ
    J Pathol; 2010 Feb; 220(3):338-47. PubMed ID: 19911421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Identification of chromosomal aberrations of metastatic potential in colorectal carcinoma.
    Yamamoto S; Midorikawa Y; Morikawa T; Nishimura Y; Sakamoto H; Ishikawa S; Akagi K; Aburatani H
    Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 2010 May; 49(5):487-96. PubMed ID: 20175194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Genomic signatures of chromosomal instability and osteosarcoma progression detected by high resolution array CGH and interphase FISH.
    Selvarajah S; Yoshimoto M; Ludkovski O; Park PC; Bayani J; Thorner P; Maire G; Squire JA; Zielenska M
    Cytogenet Genome Res; 2008; 122(1):5-15. PubMed ID: 18931480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. High-resolution genomic profiling of carboplatin resistance in early-stage epithelial ovarian carcinoma.
    Osterberg L; Levan K; Partheen K; Staaf J; Sundfeldt K; Horvath G
    Cytogenet Genome Res; 2009; 125(1):8-18. PubMed ID: 19617691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Bladder cancer stage and outcome by array-based comparative genomic hybridization.
    Blaveri E; Brewer JL; Roydasgupta R; Fridlyand J; DeVries S; Koppie T; Pejavar S; Mehta K; Carroll P; Simko JP; Waldman FM
    Clin Cancer Res; 2005 Oct; 11(19 Pt 1):7012-22. PubMed ID: 16203795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The order of genetic events associated with colorectal cancer progression inferred from meta-analysis of copy number changes.
    Diep CB; Kleivi K; Ribeiro FR; Teixeira MR; Lindgjaerde OC; Lothe RA
    Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 2006 Jan; 45(1):31-41. PubMed ID: 16145679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. DNA sequence losses on chromosomes 11p and 18q are associated with clinical outcome in lymph node-negative ductal breast cancer.
    Dellas A; Torhorst J; Schultheiss E; Mihatsch MJ; Moch H
    Clin Cancer Res; 2002 May; 8(5):1210-6. PubMed ID: 12006540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Common and distinct genomic events in sporadic colorectal cancer and diverse cancer types.
    Martin ES; Tonon G; Sinha R; Xiao Y; Feng B; Kimmelman AC; Protopopov A; Ivanova E; Brennan C; Montgomery K; Kucherlapati R; Bailey G; Redston M; Chin L; DePinho RA
    Cancer Res; 2007 Nov; 67(22):10736-43. PubMed ID: 18006816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. High-resolution genomic profiling reveals association of chromosomal aberrations on 1q and 16p with histologic and genetic subgroups of invasive breast cancer.
    Stange DE; Radlwimmer B; Schubert F; Traub F; Pich A; Toedt G; Mendrzyk F; Lehmann U; Eils R; Kreipe H; Lichter P
    Clin Cancer Res; 2006 Jan; 12(2):345-52. PubMed ID: 16428471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Analysis of chromosomal aberrations in breast cancer by comparative genomic hybridization (CGH). Correlation with histoprognostic variables and c-erbB-2 immunoexpression.
    Malamou-Mitsi VD; Syrrou M; Georgiou I; Pagoulatos G; Agnantis NJ
    J Exp Clin Cancer Res; 1999 Sep; 18(3):357-61. PubMed ID: 10606182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Gain at chromosomal region 5p15.33, containing TERT, is the most frequent genetic event in early stages of non-small cell lung cancer.
    Kang JU; Koo SH; Kwon KC; Park JW; Kim JM
    Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2008 Apr; 182(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 18328944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Array comparative genomic hybridization analysis revealed four genomic prognostic biomarkers for primary gastric cancers.
    Tomioka N; Morita K; Kobayashi N; Tada M; Itoh T; Saitoh S; Kondo M; Takahashi N; Kataoka A; Nakanishi K; Takahashi M; Kamiyama T; Ozaki M; Hirano T; Todo S
    Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2010 Aug; 201(1):6-14. PubMed ID: 20633762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The genetic differences between gallbladder and bile duct cancer cell lines.
    Saito S; Ghosh M; Morita K; Hirano T; Miwa M; Todoroki T
    Oncol Rep; 2006 Nov; 16(5):949-56. PubMed ID: 17016576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Combined array-comparative genomic hybridization and single-nucleotide polymorphism-loss of heterozygosity analysis reveals complex changes and multiple forms of chromosomal instability in colorectal cancers.
    Gaasenbeek M; Howarth K; Rowan AJ; Gorman PA; Jones A; Chaplin T; Liu Y; Bicknell D; Davison EJ; Fiegler H; Carter NP; Roylance RR; Tomlinson IP
    Cancer Res; 2006 Apr; 66(7):3471-9. PubMed ID: 16585170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.