These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Comparison of the clinical significance of the Papanicolaou test interpretations LSIL cannot rule out HSIL and ASC-H. Difurio MJ; Mailhiot T; Sundborg MJ; Nauschuetz KK Diagn Cytopathol; 2010 May; 38(5):313-7. PubMed ID: 19813258 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Significance of high-risk human papillomavirus DNA detection in women 50 years and older with squamous cell papanicolaou test abnormalities. Zhao C; Zhao S; Heider A; Austin RM Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2010 Aug; 134(8):1130-5. PubMed ID: 20670132 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Distribution of human papillomavirus types in ThinPrep Papanicolaou tests classified according to the Bethesda 2001 terminology and correlations with patient age and biopsy outcomes. Evans MF; Adamson CS; Papillo JL; St John TL; Leiman G; Cooper K Cancer; 2006 Mar; 106(5):1054-64. PubMed ID: 16421920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evidence for increasing usage of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL-H) Pap test interpretations. Walavalkar V; Tommet D; Fischer AH; Liu Y; Papa DM; Owens CL Cancer Cytopathol; 2014 Feb; 122(2):123-7. PubMed ID: 23983192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical importance of "low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL-H)" terminology for cervical smears 5-year analysis of the positive predictive value of LSIL-H compared with ASC-H, LSIL, and HSIL in the detection of high-grade cervical lesions with a review of the literature. Ince U; Aydin O; Peker O Gynecol Oncol; 2011 Apr; 121(1):152-6. PubMed ID: 21211831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Patients with epithelial cell abnormality in PAP smears: correlation of results with follow-up smears and cervical biopsies. Türkmen IÇ; Başsüllü N; Korkmaz P; Günenç B; Baykal CM; Güdücü N; Işçı H; Dünder I; Doğusoy GB Turk Patoloji Derg; 2013; 29(3):179-84. PubMed ID: 24022307 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The significance of the Papanicolaou smear diagnosis of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion. Nasser SM; Cibas ES; Crum CP; Faquin WC Cancer; 2003 Oct; 99(5):272-6. PubMed ID: 14579293 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The impact of LSIL-H terminology on patient follow-up patterns: a comparison with LSIL and ASC-H. Thrall MJ; Galfione SK; Smith DA Diagn Cytopathol; 2013 Nov; 41(11):960-4. PubMed ID: 23554221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Analysis of the Differences between Bethesda Groups according to Conventional Smear and Liquid-Based Cytology Methods in Cervicovaginal Cytology: A Single-Center Experience with 165,915 Cases. Ucak R; Dilbaz OF; Polat N Acta Cytol; 2024; 68(1):54-59. PubMed ID: 38320537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Atypical squamous cells-cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (ASC-H): a result not to be ignored. Barreth D; Schepansky A; Capstick V; Johnson G; Steed H; Faught W J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2006 Dec; 28(12):1095-1098. PubMed ID: 17169233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Implementation of the ThinPrep Imaging System in a tertiary military medical center. Duby JM; DiFurio MJ Cancer; 2009 Aug; 117(4):264-70. PubMed ID: 19536887 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The significance of ASC-H and LSIL dual interpretation with risk stratification: one institution experience. Gonzalez AA; Ametorgoh A; Hamele-Bena D; Everest S; Virk R; Cimic A; Tiscornia-Wasserman P J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2021; 10(6):565-570. PubMed ID: 34246617 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]