These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21469533)

  • 1. The effect of concurrent bandwidth feedback on learning the lane-keeping task in a driving simulator.
    de Groot S; de Winter JC; López García JM; Mulder M; Wieringa PA
    Hum Factors; 2011 Feb; 53(1):50-62. PubMed ID: 21469533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Should drivers be operating within an automation-free bandwidth? Evaluating haptic steering support systems with different levels of authority.
    Petermeijer SM; Abbink DA; de Winter JC
    Hum Factors; 2015 Feb; 57(1):5-20. PubMed ID: 25790567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Does haptic steering guidance instigate speeding? A driving simulator study into causes and remedies.
    Melman T; de Winter JC; Abbink DA
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Jan; 98():372-387. PubMed ID: 27865119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Haptic Lane-Keeping Assistance for Truck Driving: A Test Track Study.
    Roozendaal J; Johansson E; Winter J; Abbink D; Petermeijer S
    Hum Factors; 2021 Dec; 63(8):1380-1395. PubMed ID: 32551951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of steering-system linearity, simulator motion, and truck driving experience on steering of an articulated tractor-semitrailer combination.
    Shyrokau B; De Winter J; Stroosma O; Dijksterhuis C; Loof J; van Paassen R; Happee R
    Appl Ergon; 2018 Sep; 71():17-28. PubMed ID: 29764610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Is improved lane keeping during cognitive load caused by increased physical arousal or gaze concentration toward the road center?
    Li P; Markkula G; Li Y; Merat N
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Aug; 117():65-74. PubMed ID: 29656076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Potential benefits and costs of concurrent task engagement to maintain vigilance: a driving simulator investigation.
    Atchley P; Chan M
    Hum Factors; 2011 Feb; 53(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 21469529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Driver's lane keeping ability with eyes off road: Insights from a naturalistic study.
    Peng Y; Boyle LN; Hallmark SL
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Jan; 50():628-34. PubMed ID: 22836114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Lane keeping under cognitive load: performance changes and mechanisms.
    He J; McCarley JS; Kramer AF
    Hum Factors; 2014 Mar; 56(2):414-26. PubMed ID: 24689258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Speed choice and driving performance in simulated foggy conditions.
    Brooks JO; Crisler MC; Klein N; Goodenough R; Beeco RW; Guirl C; Tyler PJ; Hilpert A; Miller Y; Grygier J; Burroughs B; Martin A; Ray R; Palmer C; Beck C
    Accid Anal Prev; 2011 May; 43(3):698-705. PubMed ID: 21376857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The influence of curbs on driver behaviors in four-lane rural highways--A driving simulator based study.
    Yang Q; Overton R; Han LD; Yan X; Richards SH
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Jan; 50():1289-97. PubMed ID: 23084096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cardiac autonomic control during simulated driving with a concurrent verbal working memory task.
    Lenneman JK; Backs RW
    Hum Factors; 2009 Jun; 51(3):404-18. PubMed ID: 19750801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Behavioral Adaptations to Lane Keeping Systems: Effects of Exposure and Withdrawal.
    Miller EE; Boyle LN
    Hum Factors; 2019 Feb; 61(1):152-164. PubMed ID: 30235014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Relationships between driving simulator performance and driving test results.
    de Winter JC; de Groot S; Mulder M; Wieringa PA; Dankelman J; Mulder JA
    Ergonomics; 2009 Feb; 52(2):137-53. PubMed ID: 18972239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Concurrent processing of vehicle lane keeping and speech comprehension tasks.
    Cao S; Liu Y
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Oct; 59():46-54. PubMed ID: 23764876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparing spatially static and dynamic vibrotactile take-over requests in the driver seat.
    Petermeijer SM; Cieler S; de Winter JCF
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Feb; 99(Pt A):218-227. PubMed ID: 27978486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Steering Control in a Low-Cost Driving Simulator: A Case for the Role of Virtual Vehicle Cab.
    Mecheri S; Lobjois R
    Hum Factors; 2018 Aug; 60(5):719-734. PubMed ID: 29664680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Proactive vs. reactive car driving: EEG evidence for different driving strategies of older drivers.
    Karthaus M; Wascher E; Getzmann S
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(1):e0191500. PubMed ID: 29352314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of driver eye height on speed choice, lane-keeping, and car-following behavior: results of two driving simulator studies.
    Rudin-Brown CM
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2006 Dec; 7(4):365-72. PubMed ID: 17114094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Calibrated to drive: Measuring self-assessed driving ability and perceived workload after prolonged sitting and sleep restriction.
    Tuckwell GA; Gupta CC; Vincent GE; Vandelanotte C; Duncan MJ; Ferguson SA
    Accid Anal Prev; 2024 Jul; 202():107609. PubMed ID: 38701560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.