These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21469839)

  • 1. New approach to Gutenberg-Richter scaling.
    Serino CA; Tiampo KF; Klein W
    Phys Rev Lett; 2011 Mar; 106(10):108501. PubMed ID: 21469839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Foreshock and aftershocks in simple earthquake models.
    Kazemian J; Tiampo KF; Klein W; Dominguez R
    Phys Rev Lett; 2015 Feb; 114(8):088501. PubMed ID: 25768785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Universal mean moment rate profiles of earthquake ruptures.
    Mehta AP; Dahmen KA; Ben-Zion Y
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2006 May; 73(5 Pt 2):056104. PubMed ID: 16802995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Forest-fire analogy to explain the b value of the Gutenberg-Richter law for earthquakes.
    Jagla EA
    Phys Rev Lett; 2013 Dec; 111(23):238501. PubMed ID: 24476309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Earthquake size-frequency statistics in a forest-fire model of individual faults.
    Tejedor A; Gómez JB; Pacheco AF
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2009 Apr; 79(4 Pt 2):046102. PubMed ID: 19518296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The organization of seismicity on fault networks.
    Knopoff L
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1996 Apr; 93(9):3830-7. PubMed ID: 11607672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Unified scaling law for earthquakes.
    Bak P; Christensen K; Danon L; Scanlon T
    Phys Rev Lett; 2002 Apr; 88(17):178501. PubMed ID: 12005787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Scaling of earthquake models with inhomogeneous stress dissipation.
    Dominguez R; Tiampo K; Serino CA; Klein W
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2013 Feb; 87(2):022809. PubMed ID: 23496570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Revealing the spatiotemporal complexity of the magnitude distribution and b-value during an earthquake sequence.
    Herrmann M; Piegari E; Marzocchi W
    Nat Commun; 2022 Aug; 13(1):5087. PubMed ID: 36038553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Criticality in the Burridge-Knopoff model.
    Clancy I; Corcoran D
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2005 Apr; 71(4 Pt 2):046124. PubMed ID: 15903743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Slip complexity in earthquake fault models.
    Rice JR; Ben-Zion Y
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1996 Apr; 93(9):3811-8. PubMed ID: 11607669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Near-mean-field behavior in the generalized Burridge-Knopoff earthquake model with variable-range stress transfer.
    Xia J; Gould H; Klein W; Rundle JB
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2008 Mar; 77(3 Pt 1):031132. PubMed ID: 18517354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Simulation of the Burridge-Knopoff model of earthquakes with variable range stress transfer.
    Xia J; Gould H; Klein W; Rundle JB
    Phys Rev Lett; 2005 Dec; 95(24):248501. PubMed ID: 16384429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fragment-asperity interaction model for earthquakes.
    Sotolongo-Costa O; Posadas A
    Phys Rev Lett; 2004 Jan; 92(4):048501. PubMed ID: 14995415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Interoccurrence time statistics in the two-dimensional Burridge-Knopoff earthquake model.
    Hasumi T
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2007 Aug; 76(2 Pt 2):026117. PubMed ID: 17930114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Unified scaling law for earthquakes.
    Christensen K; Danon L; Scanlon T; Bak P
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2002 Feb; 99 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):2509-13. PubMed ID: 11875203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Similar scaling laws for earthquakes and Cascadia slow-slip events.
    Michel S; Gualandi A; Avouac JP
    Nature; 2019 Oct; 574(7779):522-526. PubMed ID: 31645722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Microearthquake imaging of the parkfield asperity.
    Malin PE; Blakeslee SN; Alvarez MG; Martin AJ
    Science; 1989 May; 244(4904):557-9. PubMed ID: 17769398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Earthquake Shaking and Damage to Buildings: Recent evidence for severe ground shaking raises questions about the earthquake resistance of structures.
    Page RA; Joyner WB; Blume JA
    Science; 1975 Aug; 189(4203):601-8. PubMed ID: 17838741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prediction in a driven-dissipative system displaying a continuous phase transition using machine learning.
    Pun CK; Matin S; Klein W; Gould H
    Phys Rev E; 2020 Feb; 101(2-1):022102. PubMed ID: 32168593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.