137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21470337)
1. Contrast enhanced sonographic assessment of feeding vessels as a discriminator between malignant vs. benign focal splenic lesions.
Taeymans O; Penninck D
Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2011; 52(4):457-61. PubMed ID: 21470337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Contrast harmonic ultrasonography of splenic masses and associated liver nodules in dogs.
Ivancić M; Long F; Seiler GS
J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2009 Jan; 234(1):88-94. PubMed ID: 19119970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography for characterization of focal splenic lesions in dogs.
Nakamura K; Sasaki N; Murakami M; Bandula Kumara WR; Ohta H; Yamasaki M; Takagi S; Osaki T; Takiguchi M
J Vet Intern Med; 2010; 24(6):1290-7. PubMed ID: 21039867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Differentiation of benign from malignant focal splenic lesions using sulfur hexafluoride-filled microbubble contrast-enhanced pulse-inversion sonography.
Stang A; Keles H; Hentschke S; von Seydewitz CU; Dahlke J; Malzfeldt E; Braumann D
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Sep; 193(3):709-21. PubMed ID: 19696284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Use of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for characterization of focal splenic lesions.
Rossi F; Leone VF; Vignoli M; Laddaga E; Terragni R
Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2008; 49(2):154-64. PubMed ID: 18418997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Incidentally detected splenic lesions in ultrasound: does contrast-enhanced ultrasonography improve the differentiation of benign hemangioma/hamartoma from malignant lesions?
Stang A; Keles H; Hentschke S; von Seydewitz CU; Dahlke J; Habermann C; Wessling J
Ultraschall Med; 2011 Dec; 32(6):582-92. PubMed ID: 22161555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Color and power Doppler ultrasonography for characterization of splenic masses in dogs.
Sharpley JL; Marolf AJ; Reichle JK; Bachand AM; Randall EK
Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2012; 53(5):586-90. PubMed ID: 22702800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Contrast harmonic imaging characterization of canine splenic lesions.
Ohlerth S; Dennler M; Rüefli E; Hauser B; Poirier V; Siebeck N; Roos M; Kaser-Hotz B
J Vet Intern Med; 2008; 22(5):1095-102. PubMed ID: 18681923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Does real-time elastography aid in differentiating canine splenic nodules?
Alder D; Bass D; Spörri M; Kircher P; Ohlerth S
Schweiz Arch Tierheilkd; 2013 Sep; 155(9):491-6. PubMed ID: 23985091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Real-time contrast-enhanced ultrasound in diagnosing of focal spleen lesions.
Yu X; Yu J; Liang P; Liu F
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Mar; 81(3):430-6. PubMed ID: 21273021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Contrast enhanced sonography of focal splenic lesions with a second-generation contrast agent.
Görg C; Bert T
Ultraschall Med; 2005 Dec; 26(6):470-7. PubMed ID: 16453218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography with SonoVue: differentiation between benign and malignant lesions of the spleen.
von Herbay A; Barreiros AP; Ignee A; Westendorff J; Gregor M; Galle PR; Dietrich C
J Ultrasound Med; 2009 Apr; 28(4):421-34. PubMed ID: 19321670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Review of clinical characteristics and applications of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in dogs.
Haers H; Saunders JH
J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2009 Feb; 234(4):460-70, 430. PubMed ID: 19222354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison between malignant and nonmalignant splenic masses in dogs using contrast-enhanced computed tomography.
Fife WD; Samii VF; Drost WT; Mattoon JS; Hoshaw-Woodard S
Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2004; 45(4):289-97. PubMed ID: 15373250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound with SonoVue: differentiation between benign and malignant focal liver lesions in 317 patients.
von Herbay A; Westendorff J; Gregor M
J Clin Ultrasound; 2010 Jan; 38(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 19790253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Characterization of nontraumatic focal splenic lesions using contrast-enhanced sonography.
Chiavaroli R; Grima P; Tundo P
J Clin Ultrasound; 2011 Jul; 39(6):310-5. PubMed ID: 21544827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Magnetic resonance imaging of focal splenic and hepatic lesions in the dog.
Clifford CA; Pretorius ES; Weisse C; Sorenmo KU; Drobatz KJ; Siegelman ES; Solomon JA
J Vet Intern Med; 2004; 18(3):330-8. PubMed ID: 15188820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Correlation of ultrasonographic appearance of lesions and cytologic and histologic diagnoses in splenic aspirates from dogs and cats: 32 cases (2002-2005).
Ballegeer EA; Forrest LJ; Dickinson RM; Schutten MM; Delaney FA; Young KM
J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2007 Mar; 230(5):690-6. PubMed ID: 17331053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ultrasonography of the spleen. Life-threatening splenic disorders.
Wrigley RH
Probl Vet Med; 1991 Dec; 3(4):574-81. PubMed ID: 1802270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound pattern of splenic metastases - a retrospective study in 32 patients.
Neesse A; Huth J; Kunsch S; Michl P; Bert T; Tebbe JJ; Gress TM; Görg C
Ultraschall Med; 2010 Jun; 31(3):264-9. PubMed ID: 19899027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
