These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21470593)

  • 1. Learning curve and fatigue effect of flicker defined form perimetry.
    Lamparter J; Schulze A; Schuff AC; Berres M; Pfeiffer N; Hoffmann EM
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2011 Jun; 151(6):1057-1064.e1. PubMed ID: 21470593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Frequency-doubling perimetry: comparison with standard automated perimetry to detect glaucoma.
    Leeprechanon N; Giangiacomo A; Fontana H; Hoffman D; Caprioli J
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Feb; 143(2):263-271. PubMed ID: 17178091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Performance of frequency-doubling technology perimetry in a population-based prevalence survey of glaucoma: the Tajimi study.
    Iwase A; Tomidokoro A; Araie M; Shirato S; Shimizu H; Kitazawa Y;
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Jan; 114(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 17070580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Visual field changes after transient elevation of intraocular pressure in eyes with and without glaucoma.
    Chan KC; Poostchi A; Wong T; Insull EA; Sachdev N; Wells AP
    Ophthalmology; 2008 Apr; 115(4):667-72. PubMed ID: 17716733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparing multifocal VEP and standard automated perimetry in high-risk ocular hypertension and early glaucoma.
    Fortune B; Demirel S; Zhang X; Hood DC; Patterson E; Jamil A; Mansberger SL; Cioffi GA; Johnson CA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Mar; 48(3):1173-80. PubMed ID: 17325161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of cataract on the results of frequency-doubling technology perimetry.
    Tanna AP; Abraham C; Lai J; Shen J
    Ophthalmology; 2004 Aug; 111(8):1504-7. PubMed ID: 15288979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [FDT versus automated standard perimetry in healthy subjects].
    ChiseliĊ£a D; Ioana MC; Danielescu C; Mihaela NM
    Oftalmologia; 2006; 50(3):99-104. PubMed ID: 17144515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Frequency doubling perimetry and short-wavelength automated perimetry to detect early glaucoma.
    Leeprechanon N; Giaconi JA; Manassakorn A; Hoffman D; Caprioli J
    Ophthalmology; 2007 May; 114(5):931-7. PubMed ID: 17397926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Visual function-specific perimetry for indirect comparison of different ganglion cell populations in glaucoma.
    Sample PA; Bosworth CF; Blumenthal EZ; Girkin C; Weinreb RN
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Jun; 41(7):1783-90. PubMed ID: 10845599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evidence for a learning effect in short-wavelength automated perimetry.
    Wild JM; Kim LS; Pacey IE; Cunliffe IA
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Feb; 113(2):206-15. PubMed ID: 16458091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Relationship between visual field sensitivity and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness as measured by optical coherence tomography.
    Ajtony C; Balla Z; Somoskeoy S; Kovacs B
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Jan; 48(1):258-63. PubMed ID: 17197541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fatigue effect within 10 degrees visual field in automated perimetry.
    Fujimoto N; Adachi-Usami E
    Ann Ophthalmol; 1993 Apr; 25(4):142-4. PubMed ID: 8484656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Improvement of visual field indices after surgical reduction of intraocular pressure.
    Gandolfi SA
    Ophthalmic Surg; 1995; 26(2):121-6. PubMed ID: 7596538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The influence of learning effect on frequency doubling technology perimetry (Matrix).
    Contestabile MT; Perdicchi A; Amodeo S; Recupero V; Recupero SM
    J Glaucoma; 2007 May; 16(3):297-301. PubMed ID: 17438423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Detectability of glaucomatous changes using SAP, FDT, flicker perimetry, and OCT.
    Nomoto H; Matsumoto C; Takada S; Hashimoto S; Arimura E; Okuyama S; Shimomura Y
    J Glaucoma; 2009 Feb; 18(2):165-71. PubMed ID: 19225357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Humphrey matrix frequency doubling technology perimetry and optical coherence tomography measurement of the retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in both normal and ocular hypertensive subjects.
    Mastropasqua L; Brusini P; Carpineto P; Ciancaglini M; Di Antonio L; Zeppieri MW; Parisi L
    J Glaucoma; 2006 Aug; 15(4):328-35. PubMed ID: 16865011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Visual field changes after cataract extraction: the AGIS experience.
    Koucheki B; Nouri-Mahdavi K; Patel G; Gaasterland D; Caprioli J
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 Dec; 138(6):1022-8. PubMed ID: 15629295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Properties of the statpac visual field index.
    Artes PH; O'Leary N; Hutchison DM; Heckler L; Sharpe GP; Nicolela MT; Chauhan BC
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Jun; 52(7):4030-8. PubMed ID: 21467169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The reliability of frequency-doubling perimetry in young children.
    Blumenthal EZ; Haddad A; Horani A; Anteby I
    Ophthalmology; 2004 Mar; 111(3):435-9. PubMed ID: 15019315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Threshold and variability properties of matrix frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma.
    Artes PH; Hutchison DM; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Chauhan BC
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul; 46(7):2451-7. PubMed ID: 15980235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.