These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
66 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21470736)
1. Patients' self-interested preferences: empirical evidence from a priority setting experiment. Alvarez B; Rodríguez-Míguez E Soc Sci Med; 2011 Apr; 72(8):1317-24. PubMed ID: 21470736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prioritising patients on surgical waiting lists: a conjoint analysis study on the priority judgements of patients, surgeons, occupational physicians, and general practitioners. Oudhoff JP; Timmermans DR; Knol DL; Bijnen AB; Van der Wal G Soc Sci Med; 2007 May; 64(9):1863-75. PubMed ID: 17324491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Wide social participation in prioritizing patients on waiting lists for joint replacement: a conjoint analysis. Sampietro-Colom L; Espallargues M; Rodríguez E; Comas M; Alonso J; Castells X; Pinto JL Med Decis Making; 2008; 28(4):554-66. PubMed ID: 18364455 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Triage for coronary artery bypass graft surgery in Canada: do patients agree on who should come first? Shufelt K; Chong A; Alter DA BMC Health Serv Res; 2007 Jul; 7():118. PubMed ID: 17651503 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The acceptability of waiting times for elective general surgery and the appropriateness of prioritising patients. Oudhoff JP; Timmermans DR; Rietberg M; Knol DL; van der Wal G BMC Health Serv Res; 2007 Feb; 7():32. PubMed ID: 17328816 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Can an appropriateness evaluation tool be used to prioritize patients on a waiting list for cataract extraction? Las Hayas C; González N; Aguirre U; Blasco JA; Elizalde B; Perea E; Escobar A; Navarro G; Castells X; Quintana JM; Health Policy; 2010 May; 95(2-3):194-203. PubMed ID: 20031251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Do general practitioners know patients' preferences? An empirical study on the agency relationship at an aggregate level using a discrete choice experiment. Pedersen LB; Kjær T; Kragstrup J; Gyrd-Hansen D Value Health; 2012 May; 15(3):514-23. PubMed ID: 22583462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Discrepancy between severity of lung impairment and seniority on the lung transplantation list. Travaline JM; Cordova FC; Furukawa S; Criner GJ Transplant Proc; 2004 Dec; 36(10):3156-60. PubMed ID: 15686717 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Waiting lists for coronary artery surgery: can they be better organised? Agnew TM; Whitlock RM; Neutze JM; Kerr AR N Z Med J; 1994 Jun; 107(979):211-5. PubMed ID: 8208479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Waiting list management: priority criteria or first-in first-out? A case for total joint replacement. Escobar A; Quintana JM; González M; Bilbao A; Ibañez B J Eval Clin Pract; 2009 Aug; 15(4):595-601. PubMed ID: 19674214 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Outpatient inotropic therapy in heart transplant candidates: should its use influence waiting list priority status? Winkel E; Kao W; Fisher SG; Heroux AL; Johnson MR; Costanzo MR J Heart Lung Transplant; 1998 Aug; 17(8):809-16. PubMed ID: 9730431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Preferences for long-term care services: willingness to pay estimates derived from a discrete choice experiment. Nieboer AP; Koolman X; Stolk EA Soc Sci Med; 2010 May; 70(9):1317-25. PubMed ID: 20167406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Eliciting population preferences for mass colorectal cancer screening organization. Nayaradou M; Berchi C; Dejardin O; Launoy G Med Decis Making; 2010; 30(2):224-33. PubMed ID: 19692710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The prioritization of patients on waiting lists for cataract surgery: validation of the Western Canada waiting list project cataract priority criteria tool. Conner-Spady BL; Sanmugasunderam S; Courtright P; Mildon D; McGurran JJ; Noseworthy TW; Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2005 Apr; 12(2):81-90. PubMed ID: 16019691 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Using a point system in the management of waiting lists: the case of cataracts. Rodríguez-Míguez E; Herrero C; Pinto-Prades JL Soc Sci Med; 2004 Aug; 59(3):585-94. PubMed ID: 15144767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Patients' preferences for scoliosis brace treatment: a discrete choice experiment. Bunge EM; de Bekker-Grob EW; van Biezen FC; Essink-Bot ML; de Koning HJ Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Jan; 35(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 20023605 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Follow-up after treatment for breast cancer: one strategy fits all? An investigation of patient preferences using a discrete choice experiment. Kimman ML; Dellaert BG; Boersma LJ; Lambin P; Dirksen CD Acta Oncol; 2010 Apr; 49(3):328-37. PubMed ID: 20148645 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Hypothetical versus real preferences: results from an opportunistic field experiment. Bryan S; Jowett S Health Econ; 2010 Dec; 19(12):1502-9. PubMed ID: 19946885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Preferences for health care and self-management among Dutch adolescents with chronic conditions: a Q-methodological investigation. Jedeloo S; van Staa A; Latour JM; van Exel NJ Int J Nurs Stud; 2010 May; 47(5):593-603. PubMed ID: 19900675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]