These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21472478)

  • 1. The generalized polymorphous concept account of graded structure in abstract categories.
    Verheyen S; Stukken L; De Deyne S; Dry MJ; Storms G
    Mem Cognit; 2011 Aug; 39(6):1117-32. PubMed ID: 21472478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Features of graded category structure: Generalizing the family resemblance and polymorphous concept models.
    Dry MJ; Storms G
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Mar; 133(3):244-55. PubMed ID: 20053389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Contrast effects in typicality judgements: a hierarchical Bayesian approach.
    Voorspoels W; Storms G; Vanpaemel W
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(9):1721-39. PubMed ID: 22537154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Combining graded categories: membership and typicality.
    Huttenlocher J; Hedges LV
    Psychol Rev; 1994 Jan; 101(1):157-65. PubMed ID: 8121956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A probabilistic account of exemplar and category generation.
    Jern A; Kemp C
    Cogn Psychol; 2013 Feb; 66(1):85-125. PubMed ID: 23108001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Representation at different levels in a conceptual hierarchy.
    Voorspoels W; Storms G; Vanpaemel W
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Sep; 138(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 21621177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Monitoring of learning at the category level when learning a natural concept: will task experience improve its resolution?
    Tauber SK; Dunlosky J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Feb; 155():8-18. PubMed ID: 25528538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Essentialism and graded membership in animal and artifact categories.
    Kalish CW
    Mem Cognit; 1995 May; 23(3):335-53. PubMed ID: 7791602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of verbal typicality judgments of mentally retarded and nonretarded persons.
    Winters JJ; Hoats DL
    Am J Ment Defic; 1985 Nov; 90(3):335-41. PubMed ID: 4083313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Abstract coherent categories.
    Rehder B; Ross BH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 Sep; 27(5):1261-75. PubMed ID: 11550753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of varying levels of expertise on decisions of category typicality.
    Johnson KE
    Mem Cognit; 2001 Oct; 29(7):1036-50. PubMed ID: 11820747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. What some effects might not be: the time to verify membership in "well-defined" categories.
    Larochelle S; Richard S; Soulières I
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 Nov; 53(4):929-61. PubMed ID: 11131822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quantifying the internal structure of categories using a neural typicality measure.
    Davis T; Poldrack RA
    Cereb Cortex; 2014 Jul; 24(7):1720-37. PubMed ID: 23442348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Feature taxonomy: What type of features do children associate with categories and how do they fare in predicting category judgments?
    Djalal FM; Storms G; Ameel E; Heyman T
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Jul; 178():114-123. PubMed ID: 28549663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Developmental changes in typicality judgement of natural concept exemplars: differences between 4-year-olds, 6-year-olds, and undergraduates].
    Suga M
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 1987 Oct; 58(4):226-32. PubMed ID: 3450912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Domain differences in absolute judgments of category membership: evidence for an essentialist account of categorization.
    Diesendruck G; Gelman SA
    Psychon Bull Rev; 1999 Jun; 6(2):338-46. PubMed ID: 12199220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A formal ideal-based account of typicality.
    Voorspoels W; Vanpaemel W; Storms G
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2011 Oct; 18(5):1006-14. PubMed ID: 21713370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Domain differences in the structure of artifactual and natural categories.
    Estes Z
    Mem Cognit; 2003 Mar; 31(2):199-214. PubMed ID: 12749462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Typicality sharpens category representations in object-selective cortex.
    Iordan MC; Greene MR; Beck DM; Fei-Fei L
    Neuroimage; 2016 Jul; 134():170-179. PubMed ID: 27079531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On domain differences in categorization and context variety.
    Verheyen S; Heussen D; Storms G
    Mem Cognit; 2011 Oct; 39(7):1290-300. PubMed ID: 21538180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.