BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21473595)

  • 1. Electroporation dependence on cell size: optical tweezers study.
    Henslee BE; Morss A; Hu X; Lafyatis GP; Lee LJ
    Anal Chem; 2011 Jun; 83(11):3998-4003. PubMed ID: 21473595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The temperature effect during pulse application on cell membrane fluidity and permeabilization.
    Kanduser M; Sentjurc M; Miklavcic D
    Bioelectrochemistry; 2008 Nov; 74(1):52-7. PubMed ID: 18502189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Osmotically induced membrane tension facilitates the triggering of living cell electropermeabilization.
    Barrau C; Teissié J; Gabriel B
    Bioelectrochemistry; 2004 Jun; 63(1-2):327-32. PubMed ID: 15110297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Long-lasting plasma membrane permeabilization in mammalian cells by nanosecond pulsed electric field (nsPEF).
    Pakhomov AG; Kolb JF; White JA; Joshi RP; Xiao S; Schoenbach KH
    Bioelectromagnetics; 2007 Dec; 28(8):655-63. PubMed ID: 17654532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Electroporation of mammalian cells in a microfluidic channel with geometric variation.
    Wang HY; Lu C
    Anal Chem; 2006 Jul; 78(14):5158-64. PubMed ID: 16841942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Physical modelling of electroporation in close cell-to-cell proximity environments.
    Gaynor PT; Bodger PS
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Jun; 51(12):3175-88. PubMed ID: 16757870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sequential finite element model of tissue electropermeabilization.
    Sel D; Cukjati D; Batiuskaite D; Slivnik T; Mir LM; Miklavcic D
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 May; 52(5):816-27. PubMed ID: 15887531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In vitro and in vivo electric field-mediated permeabilization, gene transfer, and expression.
    Golzio M; Rols MP; Teissié J
    Methods; 2004 Jun; 33(2):126-35. PubMed ID: 15121167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sine wave electropermeabilization reveals the frequency-dependent response of the biological membranes.
    García-Sánchez T; Merla C; Fontaine J; Muscat A; Mir LM
    Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembr; 2018 May; 1860(5):1022-1034. PubMed ID: 29410049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Microfluidic cell electroporation using a mechanical valve.
    Wang J; Stine MJ; Lu C
    Anal Chem; 2007 Dec; 79(24):9584-7. PubMed ID: 18004820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mechanism by which electroporation mediates DNA migration and entry into cells and targeted tissues.
    Rols MP
    Methods Mol Biol; 2008; 423():19-33. PubMed ID: 18370188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A single cell electroporation chip.
    Khine M; Lau A; Ionescu-Zanetti C; Seo J; Lee LP
    Lab Chip; 2005 Jan; 5(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 15616738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Feasibility study for cell electroporation detection and separation by means of dielectrophoresis.
    Oblak J; Krizaj D; Amon S; Macek-Lebar A; Miklavcic D
    Bioelectrochemistry; 2007 Nov; 71(2):164-71. PubMed ID: 17509948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Numerical modeling for in vivo electroporation.
    Semrov D; Miklavčič D
    Methods Mol Med; 2000; 37():63-81. PubMed ID: 21445729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intracellular delivery of trehalose into mammalian cells by electropermeabilization.
    Shirakashi R; Köstner CM; Müller KJ; Kürschner M; Zimmermann U; Sukhorukov VL
    J Membr Biol; 2002 Sep; 189(1):45-54. PubMed ID: 12202951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dependence of Electroporation Detection Threshold on Cell Radius: An Explanation to Observations Non Compatible with Schwan's Equation Model.
    Mercadal B; Vernier PT; Ivorra A
    J Membr Biol; 2016 Oct; 249(5):663-676. PubMed ID: 27170140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Determination of optimal parameters for in vivo gene transfer by electroporation, using a rapid in vivo test for cell permeabilization.
    Gehl J; Mir LM
    Biochem Biophys Res Commun; 1999 Aug; 261(2):377-80. PubMed ID: 10425193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of a pulsed electric field on damage of plant tissues: effects of cell size and tissue electrical conductivity.
    Ben Ammar J; Lanoisellé JL; Lebovka NI; Van Hecke E; Vorobiev E
    J Food Sci; 2011; 76(1):E90-7. PubMed ID: 21535680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Techniques of signal generation required for electropermeabilization. Survey of electropermeabilization devices.
    Puc M; Corović S; Flisar K; Petkovsek M; Nastran J; Miklavcic D
    Bioelectrochemistry; 2004 Sep; 64(2):113-24. PubMed ID: 15296784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of electroporation by flow cytometry.
    Michie J; Janssens D; Cilliers J; Smit BJ; Böhm L
    Cytometry; 2000 Oct; 41(2):96-101. PubMed ID: 11002264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.